Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 10 November 2022

A Phenomenological Study of Tutors’ Insights on the Meaning of Quality of Education in Selected Primary Teacher Training Colleges (PTTCs) in Uganda

Edward Kigozi

Central China Normal University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.586

Pages: 218-229

Keywords: Tutors, Insights, Quality of Education, Primary Teacher Training Colleges (PTTCs)

Abstract

Due to the pressure exerted by competition among educational institutions to achieve funding and legitimacy in public, achieving quality of education has become a major concern for all the stakeholders not only in higher educational institutions but to the PTTCs as well. So, to achieve this, an understanding of what quality is in teacher training colleges such as PTTCs is highly paramount. The major aim of this study was to explore the insights of tutors in PTTCs on the meaning of quality of education. To achieve this, the study employed a phenomenological research design to attain a deep understanding of the concept of quality of education as perceived by the tutors in PTTCs. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed through thematic and content analysis. The study unveiled that PTTC tutors perceive the quality of education in the following ways: meeting students' needs and government quality assurance (QA) standards, students performing well in examinations, work culture involving everyone to achieve the needs of the students, compliance with quality standards, and corresponding to the learners’ expectations, meeting criteria in learner support services and the ability to deliver the subject matter to the students. Finally, several recommendations and conclusions were drawn from the study.

References

  1. Abebe, R. (2014). Institutionalisation of quality Assurance in an Ethiopian public university [Master’s Thesis].

  2. Adams, D. (1993). Defining educational quality. Improving Educational Quality Project Publication, 1.

  3. Amaral, A., & Rosa, M. J. (2010). Recent trends in quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 59–61.

  4. Beck, C. T., Keddy, B. A., & Cohen, M. Z. (1994). Reliability and validity issues in phenomenological research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 16(3), 254–267.

  5. Boyle, P., & Bowden, J. A. (1997). Educational quality assurance in universities: An enhanced model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(2), 111–121.

  6. Campbell, C., &Rozsnyai, C. (2002). Quality Assurance and the Development of Course Programmes. Papers on Higher Education.

  7. Chan, Z. C., Fung, Y., &Chien, W. (2013). Bracketing in phenomenology: Only undertaken in the data collection and analysis process. The Qualitative Report, 18(30), 1–9.

  8. Cheng, Y. C., & Tam, W. M. (1997). Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education.

  9. Chivasa, S., Tapera, J., &Kwandayi, H. (2021). Quality Orientation in the University Communities in Zimbabwe. Research in Higher Education Journal, 39.

  10. Conroy, S. A. (2003). A pathway for interpretive phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 36–62.

  11. Flynn, S. V., &Korcuska, J. S. (2018). Credible phenomenological research: A mixed-methods study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57(1), 34–50.

  12. Garvin, D. (1987). Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harv. Bus. Rev., 101–109.

  13. Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Higher Education Academy York.

  14. Green, D. (1994). What Is Quality in Higher Education?. ERIC.

  15. Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55.

  16. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.

  17. Hesdorffer, D. C., Shinnar, S., Lewis, D. V., Moshé, S. L., Nordli Jr, D. R., Pellock, J. M., MacFall, J., Shinnar, R. C., Masur, D., & Frank, L. M. (2012). Design and phenomenology of the FEBSTAT study. Epilepsia, 53(9), 1471–1480.

  18. Hilton, G. L. (2016). Assuring the Quality of Teacher Education Systems and Its Link to Improvement in Learning Cultures: The Role of the International Reviewer. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1253–1258.

  19. Jung, I., &Latchem, C. (2012). Quality assurance and accreditation in distance education and e-learning: Models, policies and research.

  20. Kagoda, A. M., &Ezati, B. A. (2013). Contribution of primary teacher education curriculum to quality primary education in Uganda. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 52, 35.

  21. Kahsay, M. (2012). Quality and Quality Assurance in Ethiopian Higher Education. Critical Issues and Practical Implications.

  22. Lakshmi, S., &Mohideen, M. A. (2013). Issues in reliability and validity of research. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 3(4), 2752.

  23. Marques, J. F., & McCall, C. (2005). The application of interrater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 10(3), 439–462.

  24. Matei, L., &Iwinska, J. (2016). Quality assurance in higher education: A practical handbook. Budapest: Central European University.

  25. Moser, A., &Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18.

  26. Neave, G. (1994). The politics of quality: Developments in higher education in western Europe 1992-1994. European Journal of Education, 29(2), 115–134.

  27. Neuman, D. (2014). Qualitative research in educational communications and technology: A brief introduction to principles and procedures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 69–86.

  28. Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391–391.

  29. Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(2), 101–110.

  30. Pereira, H. R. (2012). Rigour in phenomenological research: Reflections of a novice nurse researcher. Nurse Researcher, 19(3).

  31. Pfeffer, N., &Coote, A. (1991). Is quality good for you?: A critical review of quality assurance in welfare services.

  32. Prisacariu, A., & Shah, M. (2016). Defining the quality of higher education around ethics and moral values. Quality in Higher Education, 22(2), 152–166.

  33. Stewart, B. L., Goodson, C. E., Miertschin, S. L., Norwood, M. L., & Ezell, S. (2013). Online student support services: A case based on quality frameworks. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 290.

  34. Thani, X. (2011). Phenomenology as a research design in Public Administration.

  35. Westerheijden, D. F. (1999). Where are the quantum jumps in quality assurance? Higher Education, 38(2), 233–254.