Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 14 September 2020
Aligning ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy with Communication Studies’ Learning Outcomes for Library Instruction: An Exploratory Study
Alder Graduate School of Education, USA
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Information Literacy, Communication Studies, Faculty Collaboration, Library Instruction and Research Skills
Integrating the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy in a library instruction class can be challenging. In addition, some disciplines such as communication studies have their own learning outcomes with similar connections to the framework to consider. This study explored how the framework can be positioned with learning outcomes from the National Communication Association (NCA). This study was guided by two research questions: 1. what are the intersections and shared values between ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy and NCA’s Learning Outcomes, and how can these outcomes and frames be integrated into a library instruction workshop for undergraduate students in communication studies? To address these questions, the study identified, synthesized, and presented learning outcomes from two disciplines to communication studies faculty and academic instruction librarians in focus groups and interviews. Based on the interviews and focus groups, two themes emerged in this study: concept to practice and communicating information in society. These themes illuminate the connections between the two disciplines in the context of library instruction. By gathering their perceptions, the study explored a synthesized guideline to support future library instruction for communication studies courses at the undergraduate level.
ACRL framework for information literacy for higher education (2015). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Albert, M. A., & Sinkinson, C. (2015). Composing information literacy: a pedagogical partnership between rhet/comp and library faculty. Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy, Paper 24. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2015/2015/24
Bergstrom, C. T., & Bak-Coleman, J. B. (2019). Information gerrymandering in social networks skews collective decision-making. Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02562-z?fbclid=IwAR1I3_w4gAOYtI7c60JxxYGVNkhUGGpoYh7q-r3QH1UCXwJQZyU-vPCSwf4
Boss, K. E., De Voe, K, M., Gilbert, S. R., Hernandez, C., Heuer, M., Hines, A., Knapp,
J. A., Tokarz, R, E., Tucker, C. T., & Williams, K. E. (2015). Reporting in the “post-truth” era: Uncovering the research behaviors of journalism students, practitioners, and faculty.” Recasting the narrative: The proceedings of the ACRL 2019 conference. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2019/ReportinginthePost-TruthEra.pdf
Fister, B. (2019, September 12). That’s sorted: Information gerrymandering makes us all less likely to compromise and that’s not good for democracy. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/library-babel-fish/%E2%80%99s-sorted
Gilman, N. V., Sagàs, J., Camper, M., & Norton, A. P. (2017). A faculty–librarian collaboration success story: Implementing a teach-the-teacher library and information literacy instruction model in a first-year agricultural science course. Library Trends, 65(3), 339-358.
Guth, L. F., Arnold, J. M., Bielat, V. E., Perez-Stable, M. A., & Vander Meer, P. F. (2018). Faculty Voices on the Framework: Implications for Instruction and Dialogue. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 18(4), 693-718.
Jacobson, T. E. & Gibson, C. (2015). First thoughts on implementing the framework for information literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(2),102-110.
Jefferson, C. O. (2017). Good for Business: Applying the ACRL framework threshold concepts to teach a learner-centered business research course. Ticker, 2(1), 1-17.
Junisbai, B., Lowe, M. S., & Tagge, N. (2016). A pragmatic and flexible approach to information literacy: findings from a three-year study of faculty-librarian collaboration. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5),604-611.
Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211-221.
Kuglitsch, R. Z. (2015). Teaching for transfer: Reconciling the framework with disciplinary information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(3), 457-470.
Lindstrom, J., & Shonrock, D. D. (2006). Faculty-librarian collaboration to achieve integration of information literacy. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(1), 18-23.
Marshall, D. W. (2017, April). Tuning: A guide for creating discipline-specific frameworks to foster meaningful change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA).
Mottet, T. P. (2004). Seminar in communication assessment. Communication Teacher, 18(4), 116-119.
National Communication Association (2019a). Basic course and general education. National Communication Association. Retrieved from https://www.natcom.org/academic-professional-resources/teaching-and-learning/basic-course-general-education
National Communication Association (2019b). Learning outcomes in communication. National Communication Association. Retrieved from https://www.natcom.org/LOC/
National Communication Association (2019c). NCA’s learning outcomes in communication project. National Communication Association. Retrieved from https://www.natcom.org/learning-outcomes-communication
Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold concepts and information literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869.
Willson, G., & Angell, K. (2017). Mapping the Association of College and Research Libraries information literacy framework and nursing professional standards onto an assessment rubric. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 105(2). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370606/