top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 21 June 2021

An Investigation of Prospective Teachers' Use of the Turkish Language in Social Media

Yalçın KARALI, Hasan AYDEMİR, Mert ŞEN

Inonu University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.307

Pages: 620-628

Keywords: Grammatical Errors, Primary School Turkish Language Curriculum, Social media, Twitter, Prospective Teachers

Abstract

Purpose: Not only in daily conversations, official correspondence, and educational settings but also on social media platforms, the correct usage of language by prospective teachers has become a necessity of the age. Twitter, which is used by many people to express their feelings, opinions, etc., is used actively by prospective teachers as well. The present study aimed to investigate the grammatical errors in prospective classroom teachers’ tweets. Method: The study employed the case study method, one of the qualitative research methods. The data were analyzed through the document analysis method. A total of three hundred tweets posted by 30 prospective teachers were analyzed. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data. The grammatical errors to look for in the tweets were determined based on the learning outcomes related to grammar rules specified in the Turkish Language Curriculum designed for primary schools (2019). Findings: Considering the overall results, the vast majority of tweets contained grammatical errors. It was also determined that the grammatical errors were similar in terms of their types. Punctuation errors, inverted sentences, spelling errors, and capitalization errors were some common grammatical errors. On the other hand, misspelled numbers, incorrect abbreviations, and the use of 'reinforced words' (words with a prefix to add emphasis) were rare grammatical errors. When the results were analyzed according to genders, it was found that males' tweets contained more grammatical errors than those of females. In both genders, punctuation errors, inverted sentences, misspellings, and incorrect capitalization were common grammatical errors. On the other hand, misspelled numbers, incorrect abbreviations, and the use of 'reinforced words' (words with a prefix to add emphasis) were rare grammatical errors. In conclusion, it can be said that a majority of tweets posted by prospective teachers contained grammatical errors and these grammatical errors were similar in terms of their types. Implications for Research and Practice: Also, similar studies can be carried out on the use of written language on other social media platforms such as YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook, which also have millions of users.

References

  1. Akbıyık, C., Karadüz, A., & Seferoğlu, S., S. (2013). Öğrencilerin internet ortamında kullandıkları yazılı sohbet dili üzerine bir araştırma [A study of students' use of written language in online chatting]. Bilig, 64, 1-22.

  2. Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, Y., M., (2011). Sosyal iletişim ağları ve dilin yanlış kullanımı üzerine nitel bir çalışma [A qualitative study on online social networks and language mistakes]. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), s.441-453.

  3. Balcı, T., & Darancık, Y. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin Facebook ortamındaki dil edimleri [Language actıons of unıversıty students ın Facebook envıronment]. Schrıften Zur Sprache Und Lıteratur, s.283-296. Erişim adresi: http://www.ijopec.co.uk/assets/schriften_zur_sprache_und_literatur.pdf (01.12.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir)

  4. Benli, F. (2020). İlkokullara öğretmen yetiştirme [Primary school teachers training] (1923-2018). Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(228), 71-105.

  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualitative ınquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches]. (M. Bütün, & S. B. Demir, Çev.) Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

  6. Datareportal, (2020). Digital 2020: Turkey. Erişim Adresi: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-turkey (Erişim tarihi, Aralık 2020).

  7. Demir, E., & Köse, M. (2016). Öğretmenlerin rol modelliği hakkında öğrenci görüşleri [Students' opinions about teachers' role model]. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (53), 38-57.

  8. Dilmaç, B. (2002). İnsanca değerler eğitimi [Human values education]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

  9. Durak, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Türkiye'de sosyal medya okuryazarlığı ve sosyal ağ kullanım örüntülerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of social media literacy and social media usage patterns in Turkey]. Journal of International Social Research, 9(46), 526-535.

  10. Durukoğlu, S., & Büyükelçi, B. (2018). Türk dilinde noktalama işaretlerinin kullanımı ve tarihi gelişimi [The introductıon and historical development of punctuation marks in Turkish language]. Akra Kültür Sanat ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 6(14), s.11-26.

  11. Farooq, A., Laato, S., & Islam, A. N. (2020). Impact of online information on self-isolation intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(5), e19128.

  12. Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119-129.

  13. Göker M., E., & Turan Ş. (2020). COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde problemli teknoloji kullanımı [Problematic technology use in the COVID-19 pandemic]. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi, 5(COVID-19 Özel Sayısı), s.108-1