Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 24 June 2022

Assessment on the Need for Study Program Curriculum Development: A Preparatory Study for International Accreditation

Wahidmurni, Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah, Ronasari Mahaji Putri, Jadzil Baihaqi

Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (Indonesia), Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi (Indonesia), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus (Indonesia)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.510

Pages: 518-532

Keywords: OBE, CIPPO, International Accreditation, Curriculum Development, Assessment on the Needs for Curriculum Development

Abstract

The current research aimed to investigate the need for study program to develop curriculum to meet the demands of international accreditation. CIPPO (Context, Input, Process, Product, Outcomes) evaluation model was applied through a mixed-method approach with sequential exploratory strategy: 1) collecting and analyzing qualitative data by presenting the needs of each scope of study from the stakeholder point of view and reviewing curriculum documents; 2) analyzing quantitative data from the questionnaires to measure the satisfaction level and fulfillment of the improvement needs. The result of the context evaluation suggested the need to review the curriculum documents, to adjust the learning load, and some of the contents of the semester learning plan. The input evaluation found that the availability and quality of the lecturers were good, and the learning facilities and resources were adequately provided, yet their utilization required improvement. The result of the process evaluation showed that the learning implementation was perceived to be good, so it necessitated the lecturer competence improvement in benefiting information technology media and learning modules based on researches. The result of the product evaluation suggested that the learning assessment given by the lecturers was good that the improvement demand lay in the assessment of attitude. The outcome evaluation showed that the satisfaction of alumni and alumni users was good, and it required continuous improvement in the contexts, input, processes and products as the main services of the study program.

References

  1. AIDhaheri, F., Ameen, A., & Isaac, O. (2020). The influence of strategy formulation (vision, mission, and goals) on the organizational operations. Journal of Critical Reviews. 7(17), 1932-1941.

  2. AQAS. (2020). Programme Accreditation: Criteria. https://www.aqas.eu/programme-accreditation/criteria/

  3. Arifin, P. (2018). Akreditasi perguruan tinggi: akreditasi internasional prodi (Higher education accreditation: International accreditation of study programs).  https://spm.itb.ac.id/artikel/12659-2/

  4. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. (2019). Akreditasi program studi, matriks penilaian laporan evaluasi diri dan laporan kinerja program studi, program magister (Study program accreditation, self-evaluation report assessment matrix and study program performance report, master program). Jakarta: BAN-PT.

  5. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. (2019). Akreditasi program studi, pedoman penilaian (Study program accreditation, assessment guidelines). Jakarta: BAN-PT.

  6. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. (2019). Peraturan BAN-PT nomor 3 tahun 2019 tentang instrumen akreditasi perguruan tinggi (BAN-PT regulation number 3 of 2019 concerning higher education accreditation instruments). Jakarta: BAN-PT.

  7. Binangkit, I. D., & Siregar, D. I. (2020). Internasionalisasi dan reformasi perguruan tinggi: studi kasus pada lembaga pendidikan tinggi Muhammadiyah (Internationalization and reform of higher education: A case study in Muhammadiyah higher education institutions). Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan. 4(2), 131-138.

  8. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Third Edition; SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd. Singapore.

  9. Daultani, Y., Goswami, M., Kumar, A., & Pratap, S. (2021). Perceived outcomes of e-learning: identifying key attributes affecting user satisfaction in higher education institutes. Measuring Business Excellence. 25(2), 216-229.

  10. Davis, M. G. (2003). Outcome-based education, educational strategies. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education. 30(3).

  11. Domino, P., & Eva, N. (2019). Implementasi evaluasi program berbasis outcome di perguruan tinggi (Implementation of outcome-based program evaluation in higher education). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan. (Vol. 3, pp. 766-773).

  12. Efremova, N., & Tabishev, T. (2020). International criteria for assessment of accreditation of educational activities. In E3S Web of Conferences. (Vol. 210, p. 18070). EDP Sciences.

  13. Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., Okike, C. K., & Bello, A. O. (2020). Factors influencing the use of e-learning facilities by students in a private Higher Education Institution (HEI) in a developing economy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 7(1), 1-15.

  14. Gnanapriya, K. M., & Savitha, S. (2018). Assessment of learning outcomes in outcome based education. A Journal of Nehru Arts and Science College (Autonomous). 6(2), 22-25.

  15. Gupta, S., & Dutta, P. K. (2020). Topic objective and outcome: performance indicators in knowledge transfer through in-depth curriculum content analysis. Procedia Computer Science. 172, 331-336.

  16. Gurukkal, R. (2020). Outcome-based education: An open framework.

  17. Heriyadi, B., Jalinus, N., Syah, N., Verawardina, U. & Panggabean, T. E. (2021). Tracer study analysis for the reconstruction of the mining vocational curriculum in the era of industrial revolution 4.0. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). 12(3), 3013-3019.

  18. Jadhav, M. R., Kakade, A. B., Jagtap, S. R., & Patil, M. S. (2020). Impact assessment of outcome based approach in engineering education in India. Procedia Computer Science. 172, 791-796.

  19. Karoba, K., Ardianto, Y. T., & Respati, H. (2020). Analysis of user satisfaction in mediating the effect of information quality on net benefit in “SMK Negeri 1 Malang”. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). 22(4), 14-19.

  20. Kartikasari, D., Ansori, M., Irawati, R., & Mulyaningtyas, D. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis on ISO 9001 certification and higher education accreditation. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 37(3), 470-481.

  21. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020) Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka (Guidelines for preparing higher education curricula in the industrial era 4.0 to support independent learning-independent campuses). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.

  22. Kementerian Agama (2017). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Islam nomor 7196 tahun 2017 tentang petunjuk teknis bantuan percepatan akreditasi program studi PTKI(untuk terakreditasi C dan tidak terakreditasi ) tahun anggaran 2018 (Decree of the Director General of Islamic Education number 7196 of 2017 concerning technical instructions for assistance in accelerating the accreditation of PTKI study programs (for accredited C and not accredited) for the 2018 fiscal year). http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/NEW/file/dokumen/2815334822623297S2018.pdf

  23. Kementerian Agama. (2020). Keren, ini lima pesan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kamaruddin Amin pada rapat kerja Pendidikan Tinggi Islam (Cool, here are five messages from the Directorate General of Islamic Education Kamaruddin Amin at the Islamic higher education work meeting).Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Keagamaan Tinggi Islam. http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/NEW/index.php?berita=detil&jenis=news&jd=1196#.X1UIk3kzbIU

  24. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi (2018). Statistik pendidikan tinggi 2018 (Higher education statistics 2018). Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi Ilmu Pengetahuan, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/asset/data/publikasi/Statistik%20Pendidikan%20Tinggi%20Indonesia%202018.pdf

  25. Kumar, P., Shukla, B., & Passey, D. (2020). Impact of accreditation on quality and excellence of higher education institutions. Investigación Operacional. 41(2), 151-167.

  26. Mei, L. I. U. (2020). Research on college engglish education under the guidance of OBE theory. DEStech Transactions on Social Science. Education and Human Science. (Ecemi).47-50.

  27. Mutiarin, D., Suswanta, S., & Darumurti, A. (2019). Good university governance dan internasionalisasi program studi: Studi kasus pada 2 (dua) program studi di perguruan tinggi negeri (PTN) dan perguruan tinggi Muhammadiyah (PTM) (Good university governance and internationalization of study programs: Case studies in 2 (two) study programs at state universities (PTN) and Muhammadiyah universities (PTM)). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik. 5(2), 187-197.

  28. Nisa, E. K. (2018). Analisis pengaruh akreditasi program studi terhadap intensitas belajar dan harapan masa depan (Studi Kasus di Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Walisongo Semarang) (Analysis of the influence of study program accreditation on learning intensity and future expectations (Case Study at the Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang)). At-Taqaddum, 10(2), 201-218.

  29. Nulhaqim, S. A., Heryadi, D. H., Pancasilawan, R., & Ferdryansyah, M. (2016). Peranan perguruan tinggi dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia untuk menghadapi ASEAN community 2015, Studi Kasus: Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Padjadjaran, Institut Teknologi Bandung (The role of universities in improving the quality of education in Indonesia to face the 2015 ASEAN community, Case Studies: University of Indonesia, Padjadjaran University, Bandung Institute of Technology). Share: Social Work Journal. 6(2), 197.

  30. Pedro, I. H., & Andraz, J. M. (2021). Alumni commitment in higher education institutions: Determinants and empirical evidence. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing. 33(1), 29-64.

  31. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 Tentang Akreditasi Program Studi dan Perguruan Tinggi (Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2020 concerning Accreditation of Study Programs and Universities).

  32. Pillai, K. R., Upadhyaya, P., Prakash, A. V., Ramaprasad, B. S., Mukesh, H. V., & Pai, Y. (2021). End-user satisfaction of technology-enabled assessment in higher education: A coping theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10401-2

  33. Ota, H. (2018). Internationalization of higher education: Global trends and Japan's challenges. Educational Studies in Japan. 12, 91-105.

  34. Qadir, J., Shafi, A., Al-Fuqaha, A., Taha, A. E. M., Yau, K. L. A., Ponciano, J., ... & Rashid, M. (2020). Outcome-based engineering education: A global report of international OBE accreditation and assessment practices.

  35. Rafik, A., & Priyono, A. (2018). A new insight into alumni satisfaction model for Islamic higher education institutions (IHEI). Management Research Review. 41(12), 1411-1437, https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2017-0005

  36. Reddy, B. R., Karuppiah, N., Asif, M., & Ravivarman, S. (2021). A case study on the assessment of program quality through CO-PO mapping and its attainment. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 34, 104-111.

  37. Rosyidah, R., Matin, & Rosyidi, U. (2020). Internationalization in higher education: university’s effective promotion strategies in building international trust. European Journal of Educational Research. 9(1), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.351

  38. Schroter, D. C. (2015). Sustainability Evaluation Checklist. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1925.9605

  39. Simangunsong, E. (2019). Factors determining the quality management of higher education: A case study at a business school in Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 38(2), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.19685

  40. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators Atlantic City, New Jersey February 24, 1971. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED062385.pdf.

  41. Tam, M. (2014). Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Quality assurance in education. 22(2), 158-168, available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0968-4883.htm

  42. Twum, K. K., Adams, M., Budu, S., & Budu, R. A. A. (2020). Achieving university libraries user loyalty through user satisfaction: the role of service quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1825030

  43. Ulker, N., & Bakioglu, A. (2019). An international research on the influence of accreditation on academic quality. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1507-1518.

  44. Wahidmurni, W., Nur, M. A., Abdussakir, A., Mulyadi, M., & Baharuddin, B. (2019). Curriculum development design of entrepreneurship education: a case study on Indonesian higher education producing most startup funder. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 22(3), 1528-2651.