Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 30 April 2021
Computer Assisted Education’s Effects of Learning the Eighth Grade Math Subjects with Geometer’s Sketchpad on Students’ Performance Grades and Academical Achievements and Students’ Opinions: A Mixed Method Study
Firat Hayyam Sabuncu, Jale Ipek
Ministry of National Education (Turkey), Ege University (Turkey)
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Computer Assisted Instruction, Dynamic Geometry, Geometry Teaching, Student Achievement, Mixed Research Method
In this study, it was aimed to show the effect of computer assisted learning on the academic achievement, performance levels and computer attitudes of 8th grade students in "Transformation Geometry" subject and determine students' opinions about this learning environment. The study was conducted with embedded design, one of the mixed method designs. As a result of the analysis, no statistically significant difference was found between the academic achievement of control and experimental groups. Experimental group students stated that the Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) software was useful, they expressed that they learnt the subjects better and easier, learning by applying increased their self-confidence and sense of curiosity. It was determined that students were able to establish relationships between the concepts they learnt about real life and the subject of transformation geometry and realized that they could experience mathematical concepts in many areas in daily life.
Akekin Baskaya, A. (2014). Ilkogretimde gorev yapan brans ogretmenlerinin bilgisayar destekli egitime iliskin tutumlarinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master's thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul.
Becker, K. (2010). The clark-kozma debate in the 21st century. In Proceedings: CNIE conference 2010, “heritage matters: Inspiring tomorrow”.
Bintas, J., & Akilli, B. (2008). Bilgisayar destekli geometri (1st ed.). Ankara: Ogreti Yayincilik.
Cetin, O. (2018). Ortaokul 7. sinif ogrencilerinin dinamik geometri yazilimi geogebra ile donusum geometrisi ogrenim sureclerinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master's thesis, Mersin University, Mersin.
Ceylan, B. (2008). Ogrenme nesnelerinin tasarimi ve ögrenme sureclerinde kullaniminin ogrencilerin basari duzeylerine etkisi ile ögrenme sureclerine katkilari. Unpublished master's thesis, Ege University, Izmir.
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 21-29.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Arastirma deseni: nitel, nicel ve karma yontem yaklasimlari. In S.B Demir (Eds.). Ankara: Egiten Kitap Yayinlari.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Hannafin, R. D., Truxaw, M.P., Vermillion, J.R., & Liu, Y. (2008). Effects of spatial ability and instructional program on geometry achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(3): 148-157. doi:10.3200/JOER.101.3.148-157
Hyewon, C., & Reys, B. J. (2013). If only clairaut had dynamic geometric tools. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(5): 280-287.
Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169-183.
Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 7-19.
Mann, D. (1999). Documenting the effects of instructional technology: a fly-over of policy questions. In Proceedings: The Secretary’s Conference on Educational Technology.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2021). Statement of beliefs. Retrieved March 19, 2021, from: https://www.nctm.org/About/At-a-Glance/Statement-of-Beliefs.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel arastirma ve degerlendirme yontemleri (1st ed.). In M. Butun & S. B. Demir (Eds.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayinlari.
Pesen, C. (2005). Yapilandirmaci yaklasima gore yeni ilkogretim matematik programinin degerlendirilmesi, egitimde yansimalar: VIII. Yeni Ilkogretim Programlarini Degerlendirme Sempozyumu, Erciyes Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi, Bildiriler Kitabi, 273–281.
Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Senemoglu, N. (2007). Gelisim ogrenme ve ogretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gonul Yayincilik.
Sinclair, N., & Moss, J. (2012). The more it changes, the more it becomes the same: The development of the routine of shape identification in dynamic geometry environment. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52 (2012): 28-44. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.009
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Thangamani, U., & Eu, L. K. (2019).Students’ achievement in symmetry of two dimensional shapes using geometer’s sketchpad. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1): 14-22.
Tuzer Unsal, G. (2018). Matematik dersinde geogebra programi kullaniminin 10. sinif ogrencilerinin akademik basarilarina, matematik kaygisina ve ogretim teknolojilerine yonelik tutumlarina etkilerinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master's thesis, Mersin University, Mersin.
Van De Walle, J. A. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Yuksel, E. (2010). Ilkogretim II. kademe ogrencilerinin bilgisayar tutumlari ve ogrenme stilleri arasındaki iliskinin belirlenmesi. Unpublished master's thesis, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul.
Yurdakul, B. (2004). Yapilandirmaci ogrenme yaklasiminin ogrenenlerin problem cozme becerilerine, bilisotesi farkindalik ve derse yonelik tutum duzeylerine etkisi ile ogrenme surecine katkilari. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University, Ankara.