Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 15 October 2021

Context Analysis of Non-intellective Correlates affecting Future Educators’ Sociolinguistic Competence

Kristoffer Conrad M. Tejada

Batangas State University, Philippines

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.376

Pages: 111-123

Keywords: Non-Intellective Correlates, Sociolinguistic Competence, Context Analysis, Language Attitude

Abstract

The study investigated the non-intellective correlates affecting the sociolinguistic competence of teacher education students, with a focus on the analysis of their contexts relative to social experiences, language attitude, and use of linguistic forms in different situations. It also determined the common difficulties they experience in the use of English in both oral and written forms. Descriptive mixed methods were utilized, with a validated questionnaire serving as primary instrument to gather relevant data from 331 teacher education students from different fields of specialization. Focus group discussions were conducted to activate the students’ awareness of non-intellective correlates and extract emerging issues in language use. The analysis of the quantitative data together with the coded and categorized transcriptions revealed that while the students generally have a positive attitude towards the use of the English language, they rarely use varied linguistic forms adaptive to different social contexts, implying the need to work on their adaptive capacities in using English for various purposes. Most of the issues they encounter are psychological and socio-physical in nature, while limited vocabulary, over-consciousness in grammar use, and lack of confidence affect their skills most. It was recommended that contextualized activities be developed for integration in the communication courses to highlight the authentic use of language in different social contexts.

References

  1. Acuna, C.A. and Cantos, J. (2000). Linguistic Performance of Selected Elementary School Pupils in the Division of Batangas City. Master’s Thesis, Batangas State University, Philippines.

  2. Bachman, S. (2005). What is the matter with communicative competence? An Analysis to Encourage Teachers of English to Assess the Basis of their Teaching. LIT Verlag Munster.

  3. Barnett, E. and Casper, M. (2001). A definition of social environment. American Journal of Public Health, 91 (3):465. Retrieved on October 2017 at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1446600/pdf/11249033.pdf

  4. Blanco, J., Castillo, R. and Hernandez, J. (2005). Factors that Affect Students’ Performance towards Language Learning. Master’s Thesis, Batangas State University, Philippines.

  5. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication. London, UK: Longman.

  6. Duff, P. (2014). Communicative Language Teaching. In Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton D., Snow, M.A., (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 4thEdition. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

  7. Garrets, P. (2010). Attitude to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  8. Hess, T., Osowski, N. and Leclerc, C. (2005). Age and experience influences on the complexity of social inferences. Psychology and Aging.Vol. 20, No. 3, 447-459.

  9. Kaufhold, J.A. and Johnson, L.R. (2005). The analysis of emotional intelligence skills and potential problem areas of elementary educators. Education 2005. Retrieved on October 2017 at www.go.galegroup.com.

  10. Lodi-Smith, J. and Roberts, B. (2010). Getting to know me: Social role experiences and age differences in self-concept clarity during adulthood. Journal of Personality, Wiley Periodicals. Accessed on October 2017 at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.0065.x.

  11. Mizne, C.A. (1997). Teaching Sociolinguistic Competence in the ESL Classroom. Retrieved on October 2017 at http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_interstp2/20

  12. Nation, I.S.P. and Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. London, UK: Routledge.

  13. Nordquist, R. (2012). English Historical Linguistics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  14. Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  15. Rimondini, M. (2010). Communication in Cognitive Behavioral Theory. Springer Science and Business Media.

  16. Wagner, P. (2005). Teaching American English Pronunciation. Oxford University Press.

  17. Walt, W.A and Schilling, N. (2015). American English: Dialects and Variations. Wiley, J. & Sons.