Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

Published: 28 December 2020

Enhancing EFL Students’ Autonomous Learning of English Conversation During COVID-19 Via Language-in-talk Log Assignments

Chimi Dema, Kemtong Sinwongsuwat

Prince of Songkla University, Thailand

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf


Pages: 598-615

Keywords: Asian EFL Learners, Autonomous Learning, COVID-19, English Language Teaching, Learning Logs, Online Learning


This one-group pre- and post-test quasi-experimental study endeavored to investigate whether learner autonomy was developed with implementing language-in-talk log assignments as a monitored self-study task in a university English conversation course (890-020 English Conversation). Eighty-eight Thai second-year undergraduate accounting majors at Prince of Songkla University (PSU), Hat Yai, Thailand took part in the study. The participants completed 10 language-in-talk log assignments over 10 weeks. A pre- and post-questionnaire was administered before and after the intervention to examine the effect of the log assignments in developing participants’ learner autonomy. The reflective log was also used to gather participants’ perceptions of using the log assignments in a conversation course. The results showed that the language-in-talk log assignments aided in enhancing the students’ learner autonomy to set learning goals, select appropriate learning materials, take responsibility, and evaluate their learning. Seeking social assistance, however, did not have a significant difference in mean scores, and participants expressed dissatisfaction over not being able to interact with their peers as in classroom learning. The findings further highlighted the significance of teachers’ presence in scaffolding learners to achieve full autonomy. Overall, the results from this research supported the use of the log assignment as a potential pedagogical tool to enable learners to be responsible for their own learning in a language course.


  1. Anderson, T. (2011). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.

  2. Bailly, S. (2010). Chapter five supporting autonomy development in online learning environments: What knowledge and skills do teachers need? Digital Genres, New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning, 81.

  3. Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2010). Chapter four: New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning. Digital genres, new literacies and autonomy in language learning, 63.

  4. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

  5. Bruner, D. A., Shimray, Y. P., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2014). Thai-Serbian A2 university EFL learners’ perspectives on learning and teaching oral English communication skills. In P. Subphadoongchone (Ed.),The 34th Thailand TESOL International Conference Proceedings 2014 (pp. 13-34). Chiang Mai, Thailand: TESOL Thailand.

  6. Chang, L.Y., & Geary, M.P. (2015). Promoting the autonomy of Taiwanese EFL learners in higher education by
    using self-assessment learning logs. Studies in English Language Teaching, 3 (4).

  7. Cheng, J. (2019). An investigation of learner autonomy among EFL students in mainland
    Chinese universities

  8. Chik, A., Aoki, N., & Smith, R. (Eds). (2019). Autonomy in language learning and teaching: New research
    . London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan

  9. Cole, J., & Vanderplank, R. (2016). Comparing autonomous and class-based learners in Brazil: Evidence for the
    present-day advantages of informal, out-of-class learning. System, 61, 31-42.

  10. Doyle, H., & Parrish, M. (2012). Investigating students’ ways to learn English outside of class: A researchers’
    narrative. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(2), 196-203.

  11. Duong, T. M., & Seepho, S. (2017). Implementing a portfolio-based learner autonomy development model in an
    EFL writing course. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 11(1), 29-46.

  12. Farmer, R., & Sweeney, E. (1994). Self-access in Hong Kong: A square peg in a round hole? Asian Journal of
    English Language Teaching
    , 4.

  13. Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and
    (3rd ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis

  14. Guo, S. C. (2011). Impact of an out-of-class activity on students’ English awareness, vocabulary, and autonomy.
    Language Education in Asia. 2, 246-256.

  15. Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68-86.

  16. Hammond, S., & Gao, H. (2002). Pan Gu’s paradigm: Chinese education’s return to holistic communication in
    learning. In X. Lu, W. Jia, & R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese Communication Studies: Contexts and Comparisons (pp. 227-244).

  17. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote
    teaching and online learning
    . Retrieved from difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

  18. Holec, H. (1988). Autonomy and self-directed learning: Present fields of application. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

  19. Inozu, J., Sahinkarakas, S., & Yumru, H. (2010). The nature of language learning experiences beyond the classroom and its learning outcomes. US-China Foreign Language. 8, 14-21.

  20. Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20-35.

  21. Lee, E. P. (1997). The learning response log: An assessment tool. The English Journal, 86(1), 41-44.

  22. Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language
    Learning & Technology
    , 20(2), 81-97.

  23. Lee, Y.J., & Cha, K.W. (2017). Listening logs for extensive listening in a self-regulated environment. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 26(5), 271–279. https://doi.0.1007/s40299-017-0347-0

  24. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.

  25. Little, D. (2004). Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: Some steps along the way. Future perspectives in
    foreign language education, 101,

  26. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.

  27. Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian context. Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 71-94.

  28. Litzler, M. F. (2014). Independent study logs: Guiding and encouraging students in the process of language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5 (5), 994-998. http://doi.10.4304/jltr.5.5.994-998.

  29. Litzler, M.F. & Bakieva, M. (2017). Learning logs in foreign language study: Student views on their usefulness for learner autonomy. Didáctica. Lengua y literatura, 29, 65-80.

  30. Lo, Y. F. (2010). Implementing reflective portfolios for promoting autonomous learning among EFL college students in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 77-95.

  31. Luzon, M. J., & Ruiz-Madrid, M. N. (2010). Webtasks for the development of language learner autonomy in the digital environment. Digital Genres, New Literacies and Autonomy in Language Learning, 81-99.

  32. Meesong, K., & Jaroongkhongdach, W. (2016). Autonomous language learning: Thai undergraduate students’
    behaviors. Thai TESOL Journal, 29(2), 156-186.

  33. Moon, J. (2002) Learning logs: A handbook for academics, students and professional development. London: Kogan Page.

  34. Morrison, B. (2011). Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives. Hong
    Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  35. Murray, G. (2008). Pop culture and language learning: Learners' stories informing EFL. Innovation in Language
    Learning and Teaching,
    2(1), 2-17.

  36. Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson, & P. Voller
    (Eds.). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman

  37. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Post digital Science and  
    , 2(3), 923-945.

  38. Rickards, W. (2002). Logbooks as a teaching and assessing tool. Education’s International Conference. Retrieved from

  39. Rukthong, A. (2008). Readiness for autonomous language learning: Thai university learners' beliefs about EFL
    learning and use of learning strategies
    (Doctoral dissertation, Mahidol University)

  40. Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  41. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical
    , 2, 53.

  42. United Nations Children's Fund. (2020). Guidance: Assessing and monitoring learning during the covid-19 crisis.

  43. United Nations. (2020). Policy brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond.

  44. Yusnimar, Y. (2019). Autonomous learning and teacher guidance: Towards the improvement of EFL students’
    prepared talk in speaking practice. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(1), 97-107.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle