Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 14 May 2022

Examination of the Effect of Stem Education on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study

Fazilet Taşdemir

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 282-298

Keywords: Academic Achievement, Education, Education Dissertation, Meta-Analysis, STEM


Countries with well-trained and qualified labor force today make a significant difference with other countries in areas such as economy, education and industry. One of the important reasons for this difference is that these countries have made innovations in the fields of science, technology and education policies as well as economy. STEM, which is composed of the abbreviations of the first letters of the words Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, is an interdisciplinary approach. The aim of this study is to gather the experimental dissertations examining the effect of STEM education on students’ academic achievements in order to determine the effect of STEM education on academic success and synthesize the study findings. The research was conducted in a screening model. In the study, as there is heterogeneity among the publications included among the scope of the meta-analysis, the size of the impact was calculated utilizing the random effects model. The dissertations examined within the scope of this study were accessed from the Higher Education Institution (HEI) National Study Search System databases using the keywords STEM, academic achievement and experimental model. In this study, dissertations were examined by taking a certain time criterion. A total of 26 dissertations (19 postgraduates and 7 doctoral) examining the effect of STEM education, which is the post-test scores of the experimental and control groups conducted in 2018-2020, on academic achievement were accessed from the database. It was concluded in the study that STEM education has a positive effect on the academic achievements of students.


  1. Akgöz, S., Ercan, I., & Kan, I. (2004). Meta-analysis. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, 30 (2),107-112.

  2. Retrieved from

  3. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D.G. (2000). Statistics notes. The odds ratio. BMJ. 27;320 (7247):1468.

  4. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30. ISSN-2158-0502

  5. Betts, M., & Lansley, P. (1993). Construction management and economics. A review of the first ten years. Construction Management and Economics, 11(4), 221-245.

  6. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta–analysis. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  7. Bradburn, M. J., J. J. Deeks, & D. G. Altman. (1998). Metan – an alternative meta-analysis command.Stata Technical Bulletin 44: 4–15. In Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 8, 86–100. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

  8. Capraro, R. M. (Ed.). (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2. ed). Sense.

  9. Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: The Guilford Press.

  10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

  11. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2. Edition). New York: Sage Publication.

  12. Cortés-Sánchez, J. D., Bohle Carbonell, K., & Guix, M. (2020). Innovation research in management and stem for sustainability in developing countries insights from bibliometrics in the global south. Universidad del Rosario.

  13. Çakar, V. (2019). The effect of using flipped classroom model in physics on learning products [Unpublished M.Appl.Psy. thesis]. Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University.

  14. Çorlu, M. S. (2012, June 27-30). A theoretickal framework for STEM education. [Paper presentation]. X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Niğde.

  15. Dedetürk, A. (2018). Developing and applying teaching activities with Fetemm's approach to 6th grade sound and researching its effect on success [Unpublished M. Appl. Psy. thesis]. Erciyes University.

  16. Deeks, J. J. & D. G. Altman. (2001). Effect measures for meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. 2d ed., ed. M. Egger, G. Davey Smith, and D. G. Altman, 313–335. London: BMJ Publishing Group.

  17. Duygu, E. (2018). The effect of STEM education on scientific process skills and STEM awareness in a simulation-based inquiry learning environment[Unpublished M. Appl. Psy. thesis]. Kırıkkale University.

  18. English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 14.


  20. English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3, s40594-016-0036-1.

  21. English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 5-24.

  22. Ercan, S. (2014). The usage of engineering practices in science education: effects of design based science learning on students’ academic achievement [Unpublished M. Appl. Psy. thesis]. Marmara University.

  23. Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., &  Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 661–669.


  25. Gazibeyoğlu, T. (2018). Investigating the effects of stem practices on the 7th grade students’ attitudes towards science lesson [Unpublished M. Appl. Psy. thesis]. Kastamonu University.

  26. Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. (2012). Congressional research service science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. USA: Congressional Research Service.

  27. Gökbayrak, S., & Karışan, D. (2017). An investigation of the effects of stem based activities on preservice science teacher’s science process skills. The Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2),63-84.

  28. Grund, S., & Grote, G. (2004). Pedagogical aims, course characteristics and their relation to students` behaviour: A case study on blended learning. Swiss Journal of Educational Science, 26(2), 305-326.

  29. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta–analysis. USA: Academic Press Inc.

  30. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  31. Israel, M., Maynard, K., & Williamson, P. (2013). Promoting literacy-embedded, authentic STEM instruction for students with disabilities and other struggling learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 18-25.

  32. Karasar, N. (2014). Methods of scientific research (24. printing). Ankara: Nobel Publishing House.

  33. Kearney, C. (2016). Efforts to increase students' interest in mathematics, science and technology studies and careers. National awards received by 30 countries measures - 2015 report. Brussels: European School Network.

  34. Kuru, N., & Akman, B. (2017). Examining the science process skills of preschoolers with regards to teachers’ and children’ variables. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 269- 279.

  35. Lacey, T.A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, (18),82-109. Retrieved from

  36. Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education what form? What function. Report, CurrTech Integrations, Baltimore.

  37. Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report.

  38. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective, 2nd Edn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  39. MNE. (2016). STEM Education Report. Ankara: Ministry of National Education - General Directorate of Innovation and Educational Technologies. Education _ Report.pdf

  40. Morrison, J. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The student, the school, the classroom. Baltimore: TIES.

  41. Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 74 (8), p.1-5. File.aspx (

  42. Roehring, G.H., Moore, T.J., Wang, H.-H., & Park, M.S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K‐12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44. https://doi:10.17509/ajsee.v2i1.35097

  43. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitive methods for literature reviews. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52:59-82.

  44. Sanders, M. (December 2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68, 20-26. ISSN-0746-3537.

  45. Saunders, B.D., & Trapp, R.G. (1994). Basic and clinical biostatistics. 2nd Edition, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk CT, p. 1-227.

  46. Shaughnessy, J. M. (2013). By way of introduction: Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324.

  47. Smolentseva, A. (2015). Globalization and the research mission of universities in Russia. In Higher education in the BRICS countries (pp. 399-421). Springer, Dordrecht.

  48. Sterne, J. A. C., & Harbord, R. M. (2004). Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The Stata Journal, 4(2), 127-141.

  49. Szumilas M. (2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(3), 227–229.

  50. Suratno, Wahono, B., Chang, C-Y., Retnowati, A., & Yushardi. (2020). Exploring a direct relationship between students’ problem-solving abilities and academic achievement: A STEM education at a coffee plantation area. Journal of Turkish Science Education,17(2), 211-224.


  52. Tseng, K.H., Chang, C.C., Lou, S.J., & Chen, W.P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (pjbl) environment. International Journalof Technology and Design. 23(1), 87-102. ISSN-0957-7572.

  53. White, D. W. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important? Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1-8. Retrieved from

  54. Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). Investigating the effect of STEM education and engineering applications on science laboratory lectures. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28-40. Retrieved from ISSN-2148-3736.

  55. Yıldırım, B. (2016). 7. Examining the effects of science and engineering mathematics (stem) applications and full learning integrated into the 7th grade science lesson [Unpublished M. Appl. Psy. thesis]. Gazi University.

  56. Yıldırım, B., & Selvi, M. (2016). Examination of the effects of STEM education integrated as a part of science, technology, society and environment courses. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 3684-3695.