top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 18 February 2022

Implementing Content-Based Instruction (CBI) on EFL Student’s Writing through Technology-Enhanced Language Teaching

Sariani Sariani, Yaningsih Yaningsih, Fazrol Rozi

Politeknik Negeri Padang, Indonesia

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.429

Pages: 174-184

Keywords: Content-Based Instruction, E-brochure Writing, Language Learning Innovation, Technology-Enhanced Language Teaching

Abstract

Several empirical studies of Content-Based Instruction (CBI) have concluded that this approach has positive impacts in improving language learning skills including writing in foreign language learning environments. However, many of them carried out this approach within the traditional setting; face-to-face interaction instead of the e-learning. This current study is aimed to examine the impact of CBI on EFL learner’s writing through technology-enhanced language teaching. The approach was implemented in students who wrote e-brochure for the final project. It was a qualitative study where the data was obtained from assessing the writing documents using e-brochure scoring rubrics. The rubrics focused on functional adequacy containing of five dimensions: (1) organization of information, (2) content-accuracy and information validity, (3) spelling and mechanics, (4) attractiveness and organization, and (5) graphics/ pictures. Semi-structured interview was taken as the supporting data. The findings showed that CBI was beneficial on the EFL’s writing in advancing the writing skill, increasing the creativity in designing the brochure, and enhancing the interaction with the lecturer through the use of technology. For further research, teachers are invited to engage the students with specific CBI activities in diversified contexts.

References

  1. Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125. www.ijreeonline.com

  2. An, I. S. (2013). Integrating technology-enhanced student self-regulated tasks into University Chinese language course. International Journal of Computer- Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1–15.

  3. Anwar, M. N., & Ahmed, N. (2016). Students difficulties in learning writing skills in Second Language. Science International, 28(4), 735–739. http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/636371044369572552.pdf

  4. Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505381

  5. Baghbadorani, E. A., & Roohani, A. (2014). The impact of strategy-based instruction on L2 learners’ persuasive writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 235 – 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.412

  6. Bailey, D. R. (2019). Conceptualization of second language writing strategies and their relation to student characteristics. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 135. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.9.135

  7. Baker, L. (2015). How many words is a picture worth? Integrating visual literacy in language learning with photographs. ENG L I S H T E A C H ING FO RUM. americanenglish.state.gov/english-teaching-forum

  8. Brown, D. H. (2001). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman.

  9. Brown, H., & Bradford, A. (2016). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing approaches and goals. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Transformation in Language Education (pp. 328–334). JALT. https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/jalt2016-pcp-042.pdf

  10. Butler, Y. (2005). Content-based instruction in EFL contexts: Considerations for effective implementation. JALT Journal, 27(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ27.2-5

  11. Chung, L.-Y. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of self-regulated learning in massive open online courses on non-native English speakers. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 13(3), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2015070105

  12. Cole, J., & Feng, J. (2015). Effective strategies for improving writing skills of elementary English Language Learners. Chinese American Educational Research and Development Association Annual Conference, 1–24.

  13. Conolle, G., & Martin, O. (2007). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice. Routledge.

  14. Dean, D. (2010). What works in writing instruction: Research and practices. National Council of Teachers of English. https://cdn.ncte.org/nctefiles/resources/books/sample/52119chap01_x.pdf

  15. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783

  16. Donato, R. (2016). Sociocultural theory and content-based foreign language instruction: Theoretical insights on the challenge of integration. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-Based Foreign Language Teaching: Curriculum and Pedagogy for Developing Advanced Thinking and Literacy Skills (pp. 25–50). Routledge.

  17. Dupuy, B. C. (2000). Content‐based instruction: Can it help ease the transition from beginning to advanced foreign language classes? Foreign Language Annals, 33(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb00913.x

  18. El Khairat, M., & Sariani, S. (2018). Developing students’ skill in script writing for their final project by applying guided writing task. Journal Humaniora, 9(2), 141–148.

  19. Gaballo, V. (2019). Digital language teaching and learning: A case study. In Innovation in Language Learning(pp. 444–450). Filodiritto.

  20. Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson Education.

  21. Heriyawati, D. F., Sulistiyo, T., & Sholeh, A. (2014). The Implementation of content-based approach in improving academic writing Skills of EFL students. LiNGUA, 9(2), 135–144.

  22. Hill, J. R., Wiley, D., Nelson, L. M., & Hang, S. (2004). Exploring research on internet-based learning: from infrastructure to interactions (H. Jonassen (Ed.); pp. 433–460). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  23. Huang, J., & Han, T. (2013). Holistic or analytic – A dilemma for professors to score EFL essays? Leadership and Policy Quarterly, 2(1), 1–8. http://www.untestedideas.com/journals.php?journal=LPQ

  24. Huang, J., & Han, T. (2017). Examining the impact of scoring methods on the institutional EFL writing assessment: A Turkish perspective. PASAA, 53, 112–147.

  25. Iakovos, T., Fragoulis, I., & Keramida, A. (2011). Content-based instruction in the teaching of english as a foreign language. Review of European Studies, 3(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v3n1p115

  26. Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2016). Student-centred learning in ELT. In W. A. Renandya & H. P. Widodo (Eds.), English Language Teaching Today: Linking Theory and Practice(pp. 13–23). Springer International Publishing AG.

  27. <