Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

Published: 18 March 2019

Lesson of Inclusive Education Implementation in Jakarta: Availability and Accessibility Issues

Ernita Maulida

Jakarta State University, Indonesia

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Inclusive education is believed to be an innovative educational approach that can promote the educational opportunities for all children with special needs including those with disabilities. It also stresses the principle of human right, social justice and quality of education for all. The institution education has an obligation to making education available and accessible particularly for children with special needs. This article will provide an overview of availability and accessibility issues concerning inclusive education program in public school Jakarta. The study formed within qualitative research and uses a case study as strategy research for the collection and analysis of data. Semi-structured interview with the government, schools, parents, and NGO have been conducted to analyse the implementation of inclusive education in Jakarta in terms of availability and accessibility at both primary and secondary level. The result of this research revealed that there is an inadequacy in the provision of facilities and personnel to adequately prepare the children with special needs in the inclusive education program and the inequality of accessibility to basic education services between institutions. It thus called for intervention in the education sector of the region, if the goal of education for all is to be realized. There is also a discussion of recommendations and conclusions that may assist in supporting inclusive education in Jakarta.


  1. Bergsma, S. (2000). The regular classroom as battleground for including special needs education: An assessment of options of special needs education in the Commonwealth Caribbean. Education For All in the Caribbean: Assessment 2000 monograph series (Kingston, JM: UNESCO), 1-37.

  2. Ballard, K. (1999). Inclusive Education: International Voices on Disability and Justice, London: Falmer.

  3. Booth, T. (1996). Stories of Exclusion: Natural and Unnatural Selection. In E. B. a. J. Milner (Ed.), Exclusion from School: Inter-professional Issues for Policy and Practice: London: Routledge.

  4. Booth, T. and Ainscow, M. (1998). From Them To Us: An International Study of Inclusion in Education, London: Routledge.

  5. Brahm N. and Anne L. (2013). Mapping a pedagogy for SEN, British Educational Research Journal, 27 (3), pp. 313–30.

  6. Carrington, S. (1999). Inclusion Needs a Different School Culture. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(3), 257-268.

  7. Cigman, Ruth. (2007). A Question of Universality: Inclusive Education and the Principle of Respect. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(4), 775-793. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00577.x

  8. Clark, C., Dyson, A. and Millward, A. (1995). Towards Inclusive Schools?, New York: Teachers College Press.

  9. Crippen, C. (2005). Inclusive education. A servant-leadership perspective. Education Canada, 45 (4), 19-22.

  10. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

  11. Dyson, A., Howes, A. and Roberts, B. (2002). A systematic review of the effectiveness of school-level actions for promoting participation by all students (EPPI-Centre review, version 1.1). Research Evidence in Education Library . London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

  12. Eleweke, C. J., & Rodda, M. (2002). The challenge of enhancing inclusive education in developing countries. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(2), 113-126. doi: 10.1080/13603110110067190

  13. Florian, L. (2006). The SAGE Handbook of Special Education: Sage Publications Ltd.

  14. Fuadi, K. (2013). Kebijakan Pendidikan Inklusif bagi Penyandang Disabilitas: Pengalaman dari DKI Jakarta (Inclusive Education Policy for Disability; Based on Jakarta Experiences). Solider.

  15. Goldstein, H. (2004). Education for all: The globalization of learning targets. Comparative Education 40, no. 1: 7–14.

  16. Hanmer, L.C. (1998). Human capital, targeting and social safety nets: An analysis of household data from Zimbabwe. Oxford Agrarian Studies, 26(2), 245-265.

  17. Handy, C. B and Aitken, R (1986). Understanding Schools as Organisations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  18. Harden, A., Thomas, J., Evans, J., Scanlon, M. and Sinclair, J. (2003). Supporting pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) in mainstream primary schools: a systematic research of recent research evidence of strategy effectiveness (1999–2002). Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

  19. Pivik, J., Joan M, & Marc L. (2002). Barriers and Facilitators to Inclusive Education. Council for Exceptional Children, 69(1), 97-107.

  20. Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S. (2000). History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education 21, (5) 279–96.

  21. Lynch, J. (2001). Thematic Studies, Inclusion in Education:The Participation of Disabled Learners. Education for All 2000 Assesment, UNESCO.

  22. Lipsky, D. and Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and School Reform: Transforming America’s Classrooms, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

  23. Martin, H. and Hayes, S. (1998) ‘Overcoming Obstacles: Approaches to Dealing with Problem Pupils’, British Journal of Special Education, 25(3), 135–9.

  24. Margalit, Avishai. (1997). Decent Equality and Freedom: A Postscript. Social Research, 64(1), 147-160.

  25. Mason, Jennifer. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: SAGE.

  26. McLaughlin, M.J. & Warren, S. H. (1994). The Costs of Inclusion. School Administrator, 51(10), 16-19.

  27. Nind, M. (2006). Conducting systematic review in education: a reflexive narrative. London Review of Education , 4 (2), 183–95.

  28. Ombudsman, Republik Indonesia. (2009). Annual Report (Laporan Tahunan)

  29. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

  30. Peter, C., Lynn B., & Jamee H. (1999). An Outsider Looking In: Total Inclusion And The Concept Of Equifinality. Education, Spring.

  31. Peters, S. (2004). Inclusive Education: An EFA Strategy for All Children.  Washington DC.

  32. Pijl, S., Meijer C. and Hegarty, S. (1997). Inclusive Education: A Global Agenda, London: Routledge.

  33. Porter, G. (2001). Disability and inclusive education. Paper presented at the A paper prepared for the Inter-American Development Bank Seminar on Inclusion and Disability, Santiago, Chile.

  34. Renato O, Jayne, B. & Leana, D. (2009). Moving forward:Inclusive education as the core of Education for All. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 39(3), 205-214.

  35. Riggs, Cathryn G., & Mueller, P. H. (2001). Employment and Utilization of Paraeducators in Inclusive Settings. The Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 54-62.

  36. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.

  37. Skipper, S. (2006). Conceptual Framework fo Effective Inclusive Schools. Paper presented at the ICSEI: International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

  38. Slee, R. (2007). It’s a fit-up! Inclusive education, higher education policy and the discordant voice. In Policy, experience and change: Cross-cultural reflections on inclusive education, ed. L. Barton and F. Armstrong, 77–88. Dordrecht: Springer.

  39. Stainback, W, & Stainback, S. (1990). Support Networks for Inclusive Schooling. Baltimore: Brookes.

  40. Sunaryo. (2009). Manajemen Pendidikan Inklusif (Konsep, Kebijakan, dan Implementasinya dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Luar Biasa)/ Inclusive Education Management (Concept, Policy and Implementation based on Special Education Perspective).

  41. Tarsidi, D. (2011). Indonesia towards Inclusive Education. Paper presented at the The ASEAN Cooperative Conference on Inclusive Education 2011 Brunei Darusalam.

  42. Tamatea, L. (2005). The Dakar framework: Constructing and deconstructing the global neoliberal matrix. Globalisation, Societies and Education 3, no. 3: 311–34.

  43. Taylor, Steven J.; Bogdan, Robert. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.): Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

  44. Thomas, G., Walker D. and Webb, J. (1998). The Making of the Inclusive School, New York: Routledge.

  45. Turner, C. (2003). How effective and inclusive is the school's behaviour policy?, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 8 (1), 7-18.

  46. UNESCO. (1990). World Declaration on Education For All  Meeting Basic Learning Needs. Retrieved from website:

  47. UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All.

  48. Vaughn, S., R. Gersten, D.J. Chard. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children 67, (1), 99–114.

  49. Vlachou, A. (1997). Struggles for Inclusive Education: An Ethnographic Study, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

  50. Watkins, Marc. (2009). “Inclusive education: The way of the future”—A rebuttal. Prospects, 39(3), 215-225.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved