Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 07 September 2022

Online Learning Impacts on General Foundation Program (GFP) Students` English Language Academic Performance during the Covid-19

Ibtisam Alrusheidi

University of Technology and Applied Sciences in Rustaq

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.551

Pages: 362-371

Keywords: Face-to-Face Learning, GFP Students, the Covid-19, Online Learning, Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the potential effect of the Online Learning (OL) mode on Omani General Foundation Programs (GFP) students` English language skills performance. Numeric data related to the learning achievement of the GFP students (tests and assignment scores) was collected to explore the hypothetical differences between the two modes of learning. Five students were selected randomly to conduct the focused group interview. The difference in favour of any mode of learning is considered as a sign of the effectiveness of that model. Independent Samples t-test was used to analyze the data and the study found that although emergent unplanned strategies and policies to employ online learning in the University of Technology and Applied Sciences (UTAS), there is a statistically significant difference between the English language achievement of the GFP students who studied through OL was higher than those who had studied Face-to-Face (F2F) before the Covid-19 outbreak. As the difference was in favor of the OL group and statistically significant (p=.002 at alpha=.05 level), the study concluded that OL students appear to have outperformed their F2F counterparts and that, based on these findings, OL is an effective method of teaching/learning. The study offers a discussion of these findings.

References

  1. Abbad, M.M., Morris, D.R., & Nahlik, C.D. (2009). Looking under the bonnet: factors affecting student adoption of e-learning systems in Jordan. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10, pp. 1-25.

  2. Abo-alhija, W. (2021). Action research to examine the effects of integrating Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube in online math classes on students' engagement. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 18, pp. 146-157.

  3. Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), pp. 115-125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115

  4. Al-Issa, A. S. (2005). An ideological discussion of the impact of the NNESTs’ English language knowledge on ESL policy implementation “A special reference to the Omani context.” Asian EFL Journal, 7(3).

  5. Al-Nofaie, H. (2020). Saudi University students’ perceptions towards virtual education during Covid-19 pandemic: A case study of language learning via blackboard. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), pp. 4-20. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.1.

  6. Beland, L. and Murphy, R. (2015). Ill Communication: Technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Economics, 41, pp. 61-76.

  7. Bettinger, E. P., Fox, L., Loeb, S., and Taylor, E. S. (2017). Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success. American Economic Review, 107(9), pp. 2855–2875. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151193.

  8. Callister, R. and Love, M. (2016). A Comparison of learning outcomes in skills-based courses: Online versus face-to-face formats. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), pp. 243-256.

  9. Carstens, K. J., M., Mallon, J. M, Bataineh, M., and Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of Technology on Student Learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20 (1), pp. 105- 113.

  10. Chen, E., Kaczmarek, K., and Ohyama, H. (2021). Student perceptions of distance learning strategies during COVID-19. Journal of Dental Education, 85(1), pp. 1190-1191.

  11. Darling-Aduana, J. and Heinrich, C. (2018). The role of teacher capacity and instructional practice in the integration of educational technology for emergent bilingual students. Computers & Education, 126, pp. 417-432.

  12. Ebadi, S. and Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32, (5-6), pp. 527-555.

  13. Elliott-Dorans, L. (2018). To ban or not to ban? The effect of permissive versus restrictive laptop policies on student outcomes and teaching evaluations. Computers & Education, 126, pp. 183-200

  14. Fawaz, M., and Samaha, A. (2021). E-learning: depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine. Nursing Forum, 56, 52–57. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12521

  15. Fischera, C., Xub, D., Rodriguezc, F., Denarod, K., and Warschauer, M. (2020). Effects of course modality in summer session: Enrollment patterns and student performance in face-to-face and online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100710

  16. Godzicki, L., Godzicki, N., Krofel, M., and Michaels, R. (2013). Increasing motivation and engagement in elementary and middle school students through technology-supported learning environments (Master’s research project, Saint Xavier University). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED541343), https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541343.pdf

  17. Gonzalez, T., de la Rubia, M., Hincz, K., Lopez, M.C., .Subirats, L., Fort, S. and Sacha, G. M. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education. PLoS One, 15(10): e0239490, https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/9zuac

  18. Kamnoetsin, T. (2014). Social media use: A critical analysis of Facebook’s impact on Collegiate EFL students’ English writing in Thailand. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs), 2059, https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3075&context=dissertations

  19. Lau, W. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, pp. 286-291

  20. Lesley University (n.d.). Retrieved from https://lesley.edu/article/an-introduction-to-flipped-learning

  21. Librenjak, S., Kocijan, K., and Janjic, M. (2016). Improving students’ language performance through consistent use of e-learning: An empirical study in Japanese, Korean, Hindi and Sanskrit. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 6(2), pp. 79–94. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.6.2.79-94

  22. Licorish, S.A., George, J.L., Owen, H.E., and Daniel, B. (2017). “Go Kahoot!” enriching classroom engagement, motivation, and learning experience with games. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education. New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

  23. Lockman, A. S. and Schirmer, B. R. (2020). Online instruction in higher education: Promising, research-based, and evidence-based practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), pp. 130–152.

  24. Lumadi, M. (2013). E-Learning’s impact on the academic performance of student-teachers: A curriculum lens. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), pp. 695-703.

  25. Lyke, J., & Frank, M. (2012). Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39 (3-4), pp. 245–250.

  26. Mahmoudi, M. (2020). The effect of online learning on grammatical accuracy among EFL upper-intermediate learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(6), pp. 1011-1016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1106.20

  27. Mahyoob, M. (2021). Online Learning Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Saudi Universities. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(4), pp. 1-14

  28. Marcum, J., and Kim, Y. (2020). Oral language proficiency in distance English-language learning. CALICO Journal, 37(2), pp. 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37788.

  29. Narayanan, R., and Mathew, P. (2020). Teaching international English Language Testing System (IELTS) academic writing and exam strategies online to develop Omani students’ writing proficiency. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference, 22020, Pp. 49-63. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/MEC2.4.

  30. Newman, B. M. (2020). When the classroom becomes a screen: Finding our talent zones for teaching. English Journal, 110(2), pp. 55–61

  31. Noori, A. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on students’ learning in higher education in Afghanistan. Heliyon,7(10), pages e08113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08113

  32. Parksa, R., Lowryb, P., Wigandc, R., Agarwald, N., and Williams, T. (2018). Why students engage in cyber-cheating through a collective movement: A case of deviance and collusion. Computers & Education, 125, pp. 308-326

  33. Pulker, H. and Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Openness reexamined: teachers’ practices with open educational resources in online language teaching. Distance Education, 41(2), pp. 216-229

  34. Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161

  35. Slimi, Z. (2020). Online learning and teaching during COVID-19: A case study from Oman. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies (IJITLS), 4(2), pp. 44-56

  36. Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students’ and instructor’s experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 4250 – 4254

  37. Tratnik, A. Urh, M., and Jereb, E. (2019). Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), pp. 36–45

  38. Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Sun, H. C., and Embi, M. A. (2013). Pros and cons of using ICT in teaching ESL reading and writing. International Education Studies, 6(7), pp. 1913-9039.

  39. Zheng, M., Bender, D. and Lyon, C. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study. BMC Med Educ, 21, 495, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z