Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 07 November 2022

Perceptions of School Managers Towards the Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Phenomenological Study

Metin Işik

Kirşehir Ahi Evran University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.584

Pages: 185-197

Keywords: Acceptance of Technology, Technology Leadership, Technological Competence, Technology Usage in Education

Abstract

This study aims to bring out the perceptions of school principals about technology and its use in educational institutions. The research is important in terms of determining the perceptions of school administrators to accept and use technology in the context of the necessity of using technology in schools in the distance education process and today’s rapid technological developments. The study group of the research consists of 20 school administrators (principal and assistant principal) working in primary, secondary, and high schools in in Istanbul. The data of the research were collected through semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed by content analysis method. It is understood that the administrators who participated in the research have positive perceptions of technology acceptance and consider its use mandatory. According to the participants, it was obtained that with the technological competencies of school administrators, their perceptions of following and using technology were different. In the research, it was found that school administrators use technology more in compulsory situations and to provide benefits. When evaluated in terms of technology in management processes, it was concluded that the administrators participated in the study using technology but they differed according to the age, in-service training, desire, and need of other school administrators in accepting and using technology.

References

  1. Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A. & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Technology and school leadership. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390902992527

  2. Altun Akbaba (2002). Okul Yöneticilerinin Teknolojiye Karşı Tutumlarının İncelenmesi [Examining School Administrators' Attitudes Towards Technology]. Journal of Contemporary Education, 27(286), 8-14.

  3. Altun Akbaba, S. and Gürer, M. D. (2008). School administrators’ perceptions of their roles regarding information technology classrooms. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 35-54.

  4. Bahçeci, B. (2019). Özel eğitim alanında çalışan öğretmenlerin yardımcı teknolojilere yönelik tutumlarının ve bireysel yenilikçilik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examining the attitudes of teachers working in the field of special education towards assistive technologies and their individual innovativeness levels]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University Institute of Education Sciences, Konya. https://acikerisim.erbakan.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle

  5. Bailey, G. and Luınley, D. (1997). Technology staff development program: A. Leadership sourcebook for school administrator's. Blommingtıon, Ind: National Educational Service.

  6. Banoğlu, K. (2011). Okul müdürlerinin teknoloji liderliği yeterlikleri ve teknoloji koordinatörlüğü [Technology leadership competencies of school principals and technology coordinatorship]. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 11(1), 199-213. https://www.idealonline.com.tr/IdealOnline/pdfViewer/index.xhtml?uId=2046

  7. Bates, A. W. (. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  8. Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E. K., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2014). Scientific Research Methods (17th edition). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

  9. Cerit, Y. (2004). Küreselleşme sürecinde ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin nitelikleri [Qualifications of primary school administrators in the globalization process]. Abant İzzet Baysal University Education Faculty Journal, 4(8), 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aibuefd/issue/1487/17967

  10. Celik, H. C. & Bindak, R. (2003). İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Bilgisayara Yönelik Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi [An Investigation of the Attitudes of the Teachers Working in Primary Schools towards Computers According to Various Variables], İnonu University Journal of the Faculty of Educational, 6/10, 27-38. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erziefd/issue/6001/80020

  11. Civici, T. & Kale, S. (2007). Factors Affecting the Use of Information Technologies in Architectural Design Offices: A Structural Equation Model, 4th Construction Management Congress Proceedings, 30-31 October, İstanbul, 119-128.

  12. Dillon, A. (2001). User acceptance of information technology. In W. Karwowski (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics, London: Taylor and Francis.

  13. Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(4), 338–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230510605405

  14. Golden, M. (2004). Technology's potential, promise for enhancing student learning. The Journal of Technological Horizons in Education, 31(12), 42.https://thejournal.com/articles/2004/07/01

  15. Hamidi, H. & Chavoshi, A. (2017). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016

  16. Helvacı, M. A. (2008). Okul Yöneticilerinin Teknolojiye Karşı Tutumlarının İncelenmesi (Uşak İli Örneği) [Investigation of Attitudes of School Administrators towards Technology (The Case of Usak Province)]. Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Educational Sciences, 41(1), 115-133.

  17. Hsu, C. L., Lu, H. P. & Hsu, H. (2007). Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS). The International Journal of Management Science, 35(6), 715-726.

  18. International Society for Technology in Education. (2009). ISTE Standards for administrators. http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_iste_standards-a_pdf

  19. Karadag, E., Saglam, H. & Baloglu, N. (2008). Bilgisayar destekli eğitim: İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin tutumlarına ilişkin bir araştırma [Computer-assisted education: A research on the attitudes of primary school administrators]. International Journal of Social Studies, 1(3), 251-266.

  20. Kocak-Usluel, Y. & Askar, P. (2006). İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin İnternet ve e- posta Kullanımları [Internet and e-mail Uses of Primary School Teachers]. [20.05.2017] http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek- 5/b_kitabi/PDF/Teknoloji/Bildiri/t329DA.pdf

  21. Lam, S.Y., Chiang, J., & Parasuraman, A. 2008. The effects of the dimensions of technology readiness on technology acceptance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(4): 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20119

  22. Lee, Y. & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73(2014), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.001

  23. Macaulay, L. S. (2009). Elementary Principals as Technology Instructional Leaders. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Towson, the United States.

  24. Mentz, E. & Mentz, K. (2003). Managing technology integration into schools: A South African perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 186-200. DOI:10.1108/09578230310464684

  25. Miltgen, C. L., Popovic, A. & Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of Biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context, Decision Support Systems, 56, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010

  26. Pelgrum, W. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from aworldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37, 163 – 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8

  27. Seferoglu, S. S. (2009). İlköğretim okullarında teknoloji kullanımı ve yöneticilerin bakış açıları [The use of technology in primary schools and the perspectives of administrators]. Academic Informatics’09 - XI. Academic Informatics Conference Proceedings, 11-13 Februrary 2009 Harran University, Şanlıurfa

  28. Schiller, J. (2003). The elementary school principal as a change facilitator in ICT integration. http://technologysource.org/article/elementary_school_principal_as_a_change_facilitator_in_ict_integration.pdf DOI:10.1108/09578230310464675

  29. Teo, T. (2011). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Model Development and Test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008

  30. Topcu, İ. & Ersoy, M. (2020). Eğitim Yönetiminde Teknoloji Kullanımına İlişkin Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşleri [Opinions of School Administrators on the Use of Technology in Educational Administration]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(10), Year Special Issue, 4930-4955. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.652611

  31. Tuna Uysal, M. (2020). Yaşlı Bireylerin Sosyalleşmesinde Dijital Teknolojinin Rolü: Dijital Yaşlılar Üzerine Bir Çalışma [The Role of Digital Technology in the Socialization of Elderly People: A Study on Digital Elders]. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Social Sciences of the Faculty of Arts-Sciences, (50), 43-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sufesosbil/issue/56641/741769

  32. Turan, B. & Hasit, G. (2014). Teknoloji Kabul Modeli ve Sınıf Öğretmenleri Üzerinde Bir Uygulama [Technology Acceptance Model and An Application on Classroom Teachers]. International Journal of Alanya Business Faculty, 6(1), s. 109-119.

  33. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

  34. Wilmore, D. & Betz, M. (2000). Information technology and schools: The principal’s role. Educational Technology and Society, 3(4), 12-19. http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_2000/v_4_2000.html 105

  35. Yıldırım, A. & Simsek, H. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seckin.

  36. Yin, R. (2016). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish (2nd Ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.