Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 April 2021

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Aurora-a Intelligence Test Battery

Ayşe Esra Aslan, Sümeyra Soysal

Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (Turkey), Necmettin Erbakan University (Turkey)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.241

Pages: 214-225

Keywords: Triarchic Intelligence Theory, Measurement of Intelligence, Adaptation of Intelligence Test, Factor Analysis

Abstract

The Aurora-a test battery was applied to 520 students who were between the ages of 9 and 12 attending public and private schools in Istanbul to create the Turkish version of the Aurora-a Intelligence Test Battery (Aurora-a_TR), which was developed for children aged 9-12 years based on the Triarchic Intelligence Theory. The three sub-test scores that measured verbal intelligence in the original form were excluded from the analyses since they were not suitable for statistical analysis. The validity evidence of Aurora-a_TR test was obtained by Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability Analyses. The analyses supported the three-factor Triarchic Intelligence Model with strong evidence, which also included the fourteen subtests. It was recommended in this study to re-apply Aurora-a_TR on a different sampling with the tests that were re-adapted into Turkish for 3 verbal content tests, which could not be tested in the present study.

References

  1. Aljughaiman, A. M., & Ayoub, A. E. A. (2012). The effect of an enrichment program on developing analytical, creative, and practical abilities of elementary gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(2), 153-174.

  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

  3. Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick's model on creativity‐related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. The Journal of creative behavior, 47(4), 273-289.

  4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models(pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  5. Chart, H., Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Identification: The aurora battery. In J. E. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 281-301). Waco, TX: Prufrock.

  6. Cronbach, L. J., Schonemann, P., & McKie, D. (1965). Alpha coefficients for stratified-paralel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 291-312.

  7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312

  8. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. the theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.

  9. Gaski J. F. & Nevin, J. R. (1985). The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel. Journal of marketing research,130-142. doi:10.2307/3151359

  10. Gottfredson, L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2009). Intelligence: Foundations and issues in assessment. Canadian Psychology, 50(3), 183-195. doi: 10.1037/a0016641

  11. Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Considering language, culture, and cognitive abilities: The international translation and adaptation of the Aurora Assessment Battery. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Assessment of abilities and competencies in the era of globalization (p. 443–468). New York, NY: Springer.

  12. Gubbels, J., Segers, E., Keuning, J. & Verhoeven, L. (2016). The Aurora-a Battery as an Assessment of Triarchic Intellectual Abilities in Upper Primary Grades. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 26–238. doi: 10.1177/0016986216645406

  13. Güçyeter, S. (2106). Gifted identification researches in Turkey and the measurement equipments that used in identification. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(4), 235-254.

  14. Hein, S., Tan, M., Aljughaiman, A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2015). Gender differences and school influences with respect to three indicators of general intelligence: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 486.doi: /10.1037/a0037519.supp

  15. Heller, K. A., Pertelh, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 147–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  16. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

  17. Kaygın, B., & Çetinkaya, Ç. (2015). Yaratıcılığın değerlendirmesinde yeni yaklaşımlar. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(1), 1-11. doi: 10.18200/JGEDC.2015210883

  18. Malda, M., van de Vijver, F. J., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., & Sukumar, P. (2010). Traveling with cognitive tests: testing the validity of a KABC-II adaptation in India. Assessment, 17(1), 107-115.

  19. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables user’s guide 6.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  20. Pal, H. R., Pal, A., & Tourani, P. (2004). Theories of intelligence. Everyman’s Science, 39(3), 181-192.

  21. Pierson, E. E., Kilmer, L. M., Rothlisberg, B. A., & McIntosh, D. E. (2012). Use of brief intelligence tests in the identification of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 10-24.

  22. Prieto, D., Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, M., & Bermejo, M. R. (2015). Aurora Battery: A new assessment of successful intelligence. [La Batería Aurora: una nueva evaluación de la inteligencia exitosa] Revista de Educación, 368, 183-210. doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-294.

  23. Robitzsch, A. (2020). sirt: Supplementary Item Response Theory Models. R package version 3.9-4.  http://r.meteo.uni.wroc.pl/web/packages/sirt/sirt.pdf

  24. Sak, U. BalSezerel, B. Ayaş, M. B. Tokmak, F. (2016). Anadolu Sak Zekâ Ölçeği (ASIS) uygulayıcı kitabı. Eskişehir: Centre for Gifted Education of Anadolu University.

  25. Santrock, J. W. (2011). Life-Span Development [Yaşam Boyu Gelişim]. (G.Yüksel, Trans.) Ankara: Nobel.

  26. Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1988). The IQ controversy, the media and public policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

  27. Sternberg R. J. (1995). Styles of thinking and learning. Language Testing, 12(3), 265-291. doi:10.1177/026553229501200302

  28. Sternberg R. J. (1999). The Theory of successful ıntelligence. Review of General Psychology. 13(4), 292-316. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292

  29. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). The evolution of theories of intelligence. Intelligence, 5(3), 209-230.

  30. Sternberg, R.J.& Grigorenko, E.L. (2004) Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 274-279. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3701535.

  31. Tan, M. T., Aljughaiman, A. M., Elliott, J. G., Kornilov, S. A., Ferrando-Prieto, M., Bolden, D. S., Adams-Shearer, K., Chart, H. E., Newman, T., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Considering language, culture, and cognitive abilities: The international translation and adaptation of the Aurora Assessment Battery. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (p. 443–468). New York, NY: Springer.

  32. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, Verbal Tests Forms A and B (Figural A and B), IL: Scholastic Service Inc. Bensenville.

  33. Uluç, S., Öktem, F., Erden, G., Gençöz, T., & Sezgin, N. (2011). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-iv: a new era for turkey in evaluation of intelligence in the clinical context. Turkish Psychological Articles, 14(28), 49.

  34. Vijver, F. V. D. (1997). Meta-analysis of cross-cultural comparisons of cognitive test performance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(6), 678-709.