Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

Published: 27 December 2019

Strategic Analysis for Accreditation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Case Analysis of KAU and PSU

Saud Albaqami

Ministry of Higher Education, Saudi Arabia

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1993.02.04.111

Pages: 843-856

Keywords: Saudi Arabia, Accreditation, KAU, PSU

Abstract

Quality assurance strategies and standards have long been employed—at least since the dawn of the industrial age, which introduced mass operations and mass production to meet the needs of consumers. In any workplace, plans and strategies are systematically devised and guidelines are implemented in order to ensure the conformity of operations and systems to government or privately established and recognized standards. The high expectations applied to the educational sector cause particularly great demand for standardized quality assurance strategies. This has led to the establishment of accreditation institutions—external organizations that have developed and promulgated standards for quality and have evaluated colleges and universities according to these standards (ESIB, 2006; NAPCIS, 2012). In Saudi Arabia, the quality assurance directives of NCAAA require educational institutions to establish dedicated quality assurance models. The present study was intended to assess the current state of quality assurance implementation at Saudi Arabian higher education institutions and develop a normative quality assurance model based upon the inferences obtained, to be used as a guideline for future quality assurance systems in Saudi higher education institutions. For this purpose, qualitative research was conducted using two case studies—KAU and PSU—and was cross-analyzed and presented. The present article provides a discussion of the findings presented.

References

  1. Darandari, E. Z., AL-Qahtani, S. A., Allen, I. D., AL-Yafi, W. A., Al-Sudairi, A. A., & Catapang, J. (2009). The quality assurance system for post-secondary education in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive, developmental and unified approach. Quality in Higher Education, 15(1), 39-50.
  2. Dill, D. (2010). Quality Assurance in Higher Education–Practices and Issues. International Encyclopedia of Education, 377-383.
  3. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  4. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W.W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Aldine.
  6. Haapakorpi, A. (2011). Quality assurance processes in Finnish universities: Direct and indirect outcomes and organisational conditions. Quality in Higher Education, 17(1), 69-81.
  7. Harvey, L., & Stensaker, B. (2008). Quality Culture: Understandings, boundaries and linkages. European Journal of Education, 43(4), 427-442.
  8. Hassan, A., Amer, H., Abdulbamaid, A., & Maghrabi, A. (2005). Quality Assessment of Dental Health Services Provided at the Faculty of Dentistry. King Abdulaziz University. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www.kau.edu.sa/Files/165/Researches/591_Quality%20Assessment%20of%20Dental
  9. Huusko, M., & Ursin, J. (2010). Why (not) assess? Views from the academic departments of Finnish universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 859-869.
  10. Merriam, S. (1997). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. Jossey-Bass.
  11. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  12. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  13. Ministry of Higher Education. (2009). Statistics of Higher Education in the KSA, 32. Riyadh: Ministry of Higher Education Press.
  14. Modell, S. (2003). Goals versus institutions: The development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14(4), 333-359.
  15. NAPCIS. (2012). The History of Accreditation. Retrieved April 15, 2012,from http://www.napcis.org/history.html
  16. National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA). (2009). Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia (NCAAA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).
  17. National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA). (2010). Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia (NCAAA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).
  18. Oliver, C. (1997).Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Cmbining institutional and resource‐based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 697‐713.
  19. PSU (Prince Sultan University). (2010). Academic Assessment and Planning Center.
  20. PSU (Prince Sultan University). (2011). Strategic Plan, 2011-2016.
  21. PSU (Prince Sultan University). (2013). learning and Teaching Quality Framework.
  22. PSU (Prince Sultan University). (2013). University Bulletin.
  23. Rosa, M. J., Tavares, D., & Amaral, A. (2006). Institutional Consequences of Quality Assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 12, 145-159.
  24. TEQSA. (2013). About TEQSA. Retrieved June 22, 2013, from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/about
  25. University of Aberdeen. (2012). Section 2-Quality Assurance in Higher Education: An Overview. Retrieved April 15, 2012, from http://www.abdn.ac.uk/quality/section2.shtml
  26. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research, design and methods.Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  27. Zahed, A., Bafail, A., & Bashir, M. (2007). Quality Assurance of Engineering education at King Abdulaziz University. Proceedings of the 10th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Bangkok Thailand, 19-23.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved