Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 10 August 2022
The Challenge of Turkish Proper Names in Foreign Language Learning
Gülden Tüm, Dilek Yumru
Cukurova University (Turkey), Mersin University (Turkey)
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Onomastics, Turkish Personal Names, Gender, Word Formations
The article aims to sort out semantic and cultural diversity in Turkish female and male names, which could be challenging for foreign learners of Turkish. This research was designed as a descriptive analysis into how foreign names could be semantically and culturally interfered by foreign language learners of Turkish. So as to make the classification, the most frequent 100 names of newborn Turkish citizens between 1950 and 2020 years were officially gathered from the Turkish Statistics Institute. The findings reveal that these names reflect a wide diversity ranging from functional words to their derivations since Turkish is an agglutinative language causing challenges for foreigners, and it deduces it is far beyond of their formations. It is assumed that these names raise critical language awareness on structural and deep cultural insights of target language.
Ağırman, C. (1998). Ad koyma ve Hz. Peygamber’in isimlere karşı tutumu [Giving name and the attitude of the Prophet towards proper names]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Ilahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2, 123-143. https://agirman.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/
Ainiala T., and Östman J.A. (2018). Socio-onomastics and pragmatics. Gender and methodology in the Ancient Near East, Barcino Monographica Orientalia. 10. https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?q=Socio-onomastics+and+pragmatics.+Gender+and+methodology+in+the+Ancient+Near+East,&hl=tr&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
Aksholakova, A. (2014). Proper name as a clue symbol of Identity. International conference on education & Educational Psychology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 112, 465-471.
Anashkina I.A., Konkova I.I. (2018). Anthropotonymic structures in discourse. Art Human Open Access 2(6), 345-347. DOI: 10.15406/ahoaj.2018.02.00080.
Angelou M. (1969). I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. New York: Random House
Aykut, K. (2017). The influence of Turkish anthroponymy on the translation of the novel “100” By Başar Akşan”, Mavi Atlas. 5(2), 663-677.
Calp, M. (2014). Kişi adları üzerine dilbilimsel bir çalışma: Ağrı ili örneği [A linguistic study on proper names: A case of Ağrı District). Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi[TAED], 52, 27-49.
Coates, R. A. (2009). Strictly millian approach to the definition of the proper name. Mind & Language, 24(4), 433–444.
Eugenia, E., Romanova, E.E., and Spiridonov, D.V. (2018). Syntactic features of proper names: the generativist approach(es) properhood, Voprosy Anomastiki. 15(3), 7-35.
Luchtenberg, S. (2010). Proper names as a target of language awareness. Language Awareness. 1(1), 22-31. DOI: 10.1080/09658419808667098
Maduagwu, G. (2010). Iglo personal names: a morpho-semantic study. Language matters. 41(2),315-324.
Matushansky, O. (2009). On the linguistic complexity of proper names, Linguistics and philosophy Springer Verlag, 31(5), 573-627. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00478454
Motschenbacher, H. (2020).Corpus linguistic onomastics: A plea for a corpus-based ınvestigation of names, Names. 68(2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2020.1731240
Murru-Corriga, G. (2000). The patronymic and the matronymic in Sardinia, The History of the Family, 5(2), 161-180, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-602X(00)00034-8
Ngoc-My, G. (2001). Establishment of Vietnamese personal names. Technical Services Quarterly. 18(2), 15-29, https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v18n02_02
Nuyts, J. (1991). Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language: on cognition, functionalism, and grammar. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.20
Petit C., and Sieffermann J. (2007). Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence? Food Quality and Preference 18(1), 161-172.
Sarıtaş, S. (2009). Balıkesir üniversitesi öğrencilerinin günümüzdeki adlar ve ad verme hakkındaki görüşleri, [The view of university students at Balıkesir University on current names and name giving]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 12(21), 422-433.
Sengani, T.M. (2018). Some historical event-marking names in Tshivenḓa. South African Journal of African Languages. 38(1), 87-97 https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2018.1429872
Shokhenmayer, E. (2018). Preliminary study of the most frequent Russian, French and German occupational surnames. Onomastica lipsiensia/OL. 13, 271-290.
Tse Grace, Y. W. (2004). A grammatical study of personal names in present-day English: with special reference to the usage of the definite article, English Studies. 85(3), 241–259.
Tüm, G. (2018). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde kişi ad ve soyadlarının sınıflandırılması ve okuma metinlerinde kullanımı [The classification of proper names and their usage in reading texts in teaching Turkish as a foreign language], Sınırsız Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi. 3(3), 34-60. DOI: 10.29250/sead.463314
Uca, A. (2004). Türk toplumunda ad verme geleneği [The name giving tradition in Turkish society], Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi. 23, 145-150.
Vascenco V. (1975). Concerning the standard system of Romanian surnames, names // Names: A journal of onomastics. 23(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.19188.8.131.52
Vodanović, B. (2014). Denominacija identiteta (Na primjeru francuskoga antroponimijskog sustava). Fluminensia. 1, 133-145.
Yumaguzin, V., and Vinnik, M. (2019). Surnames in modern Russia, Annals of Human Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2019.1685130