Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 10 September 2021

The Effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model With Outdoor Approach Towards the Students’ Ability of Mathematical Representation

Hermawan Gatot Priyadi, Yumiati

SUPM Negeri (Indonesia), Universitas Terbuka (Indonesia)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.352

Pages: 441-450

Keywords: Contextual Teaching-Learning, Outdoor, Mathematical Representation

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model with the outdoor approach towards students’ ability in mathematical representation. It was quasi-experimental research consisting of two experimental classes and one control group. It used a pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study was the students of SUPM Tegal. Sampling was conducted using cluster random consisting of three classes. The first experimental group was carried out by implementing the learning model of CTL with the outdoor approach. The second experimental group was carried out by implementing a learning model of CTL, while the control group was conducted by implementing a conventional learning model. The research instrument was a 7-point mathematical representation test in the form of an essay. The results of the research were 1) the learning model of CTL with an outdoor approach affected the improvement and achievement of the students’ ability in mathematical representation and was higher than CTL and a conventional learning; 2) the improvement of the students’ ability of representation in the groups of CTL with outdoor approach, CTL, and conventional learning respectively was in high, medium, and low category.

References

  1. Acar, H. (2014). Learning Environments for Children in Outdoor Spaces. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.147

  2. Alhadad, S. F. (2010). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Multipel Matematik, Pemecahan Masalah Matematik dan Self Esteem siswa SMP melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Open Ended. Disertasi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

  3. Anastasiadou, S. D. (2008). The Role of Representations in Solving Statistical Problems and the Translation Ability of Fifth and Sixth Grade Students. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 14(10), 125–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v14i10/45497

  4. Clarke, D., & Roche, A. (2018). Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51(November 2016), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.006

  5. Depdiknas. (2003). Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

  6. Dyment, J. E., Chick, H. L., Walker, C. T., Thomas, P. N., Dyment, J. E., Chick, H. L., Macqueen, T. P. N. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge and the teaching of outdoor education education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1451756

  7. Effendi, L. A. (2012). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(2), 1–10.

  8. Goldin, G. (2002). Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 197–218). London: LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES.

  9. Haji, S., & Maizora, S. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Outdoor Mathematics Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi dan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Laporan Penelitian, LPPM Universitas Bengkulu.

  10. Hake, R. R. (1999). ANALYZING CHANGE/GAIN SCORES. Woodland Hills: Dept. Of Physics, Indiana University.

  11. Hoogland, K., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., Pepin, B. E. U., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58(April), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.004

  12. Husamah. (2013). Pembelajaran Luar Kelas Outdoor Learning. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

  13. Indahsari, S. N. (2015). Perbandingan antara Kegiatan Pembelajaran di Luar Kelas dan Kegiatan Pembelajaran di Dalam Kelas terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Turatea Kab. Jeneponto. Tesis Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin.

  14. Jaenudin. (2008). Pengaruh Pendekatan Kontekstual terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematik Beragam Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan UPI, 2(1), 1–14.

  15. Johnson, E. B. (2007). Contextual Teaching and Learning Terjemahan Ibnu Setiawan. Bandung: MLC.

  16. Kartini. (2009). Peranan Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 361–372. Yogyakarta.

  17. KBBI. (2002). Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

  18. Mamolo, A. (2018). Perceptions of social issues as contexts for secondary mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51(June), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.007

  19. McCoy, L. P., Baker, T. H., & Little, L. S. (1996). Using Multiple Representations to Communicate: An Algebra Challenge. In NCTM, Communication in Mathematics, K-12 and Beyond (P.C. Elliot ed.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  20. Muchith, S. (2007). Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Semarang: RaSAIL Media Grup.

  21. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. USA: NCTM.

  22. OECD. (2014). A Profile of Student Performance in Mathematics. In PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science Volume I (1st ed., pp. 31–144). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en

  23. Otte, C. R., Bølling, M., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Teaching maths outside the classroom: does it make a difference? Educational Research. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2019.1567270

  24. Poedjiadi, A. (2005). Sains Teknologi Masyarakat: Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Bermuatan Nilai. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

  25. Richmond, D., Sibthorp, J., Gookin, J., Annarella, S., Ferri, S., Richmond, D., … Ferri, S. (2017). Complementing classroom learning through outdoor adventure education : out-of-school-time experiences that make a difference. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1324313

  26. Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. Shrewsbury, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.

  27. Romar, J. E., Enqvist, I., Kulmala, J., Kallio, J., & Tammelin, T. (2018). Physical activity and sedentary behaviour during outdoor learning and traditional indoor school days among Finnish primary school students. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1488594

  28. Rustam, A., & Adili, M. (2016). Improving the results of math learning through scramble cooperative model with the approach of contextual teaching improving the results of math learning through scramble cooperative model with the approach of contextual. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(June 2017), 8. Retrieved from http://usnsj.com/index.php/JME

  29. Rustam, A., & Handayani, A. L. (2017). Efectivity of Contextual Learning Towards Mathematical Communication Skills of the 7 Th Grade of Smpn 2 Kolaka. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–10. Retrieved from http://usnsj.com/index.php/JME

  30. Selling, S. K. (2016). Learning to represent, representing to learn. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.003

  31. Spalie, N., Utaberta, Abdullah, Tahir, M., & Che, A. (2011). Reconstructing sustainable outdoor learning environment in Malaysia from the understanding of natural school design and approaches in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3310–3315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.291

  32. Sumarmi. (2012). Model-Model Pembelajaran Geografi. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media Publishing.

  33. Sumpter, L., & Hedefalk, M. (2015). Preschool children’s collective mathematical reasoning during free outdoor play. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.03.006

  34. Suwanjal, U. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Matematik Siswa SMP. Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universtas Muhammadiyah Metro, 5(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v5i1.466

  35. Suwarna. (2016). Pengajaran Mikro. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

  36. Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

  37. Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

  38. Ulusoy, F., & Argun, Z. (2017). Secondary School Students’ Representations for Solving Geometric Word Problems in Different Clinical Interviews. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.328341

  39. Widiasworo, E. (2017). Strategi dan Metode Mengajar di Luar Kelas (Outdoor Learning). Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

  40. Yee, S. P., & Bostic, J. D. (2014). Developing a contextualization of students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.002

  41. Yumiati & Haji, S. (2018). The Students Ability of Expressing Generality in Numbers at Junior High School Based On School Level. Paper in The 4th International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (ICTTE), Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 20-21 July 2018.

  42. Yuniawatika. (2011). Penerapan Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Strategi REACT untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi dan Representasi Matematik Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Tesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.