Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 April 2021

The Knowledge and Awareness Levels of Gifted Children on Nanotechnology

Mücahit Köse

Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.235

Pages: 157-168

Keywords: Gifted Students, Nanotechnology, Awareness, Knowledge

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the knowledge and awareness of gifted children receiving education in the Science and Art Center on nanotechnology. The descriptive survey model was used in the study. The purposeful sampling method was chosen and a total of 160 students receiving education in two Science and Art Centers located in the city of Antalya in the 2018-2019 academic year were included in the study. The students consisted of 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th-grade students. The study tested whether the nanotechnology knowledge levels of gifted students differ according to the variables of students 'gender, grade level, knowledge source, parents' education level, and occupation. According to the findings, while the students’ knowledge and awareness of nanotechnology did not create a significant difference in terms of the gender variable, it was determined that as the grade level increased, the knowledge and awareness level also increased. Also, it was determined that as the parents’ education level increased, the students’ knowledge on nanotechnology increased and that the knowledge and awareness of students whose parents are engineers or doctors were higher compared to the other students.

References

  1. Ak, N. (2009). Nanoteknoloji eğitiminin lise düzeyine uyarlanması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara

  2. Alpat, S. K., Uyulgan, M. A., Şeker, S., Altaş, H. Ş., & Gezer, E. (2017). Effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement and opinions of the 10th grade students’ in the topic of nanotechnology at secondary level. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(1), 27-57.

  3. Aslan, O. ve Şenel, T. (2015). Fen alanları öğretmen adaylarının nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji farkındalık düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 363-389.

  4. Atabaş, Ü. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerini nanoteknoloji ve biyoteknoloji konularında eğitmeye ve bilgilendirmeye yönelik bir çalışma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fatih Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

  5. Bowles, K. (2008). Teaching nanotechnology in the K-12 science classroom. In A. E. Sweeney & S. Seal (Eds.), Nanoscale science and engineering education (pp. 37– 47). Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Scientific Publishers.

  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates

  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

  8. Daly, S., Hutchinson, K., & Bryan, L. (2007). Incorporating nanoscale science and engineering concepts into middle and high school curricula. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.12(1).

  9. Doyle, E. M. (2006). Veterinary drug residues in processed meats potential health risk. A Review of the Scientific Literature, 2 - 7.

  10. Ekli, E. (2010). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin nanoteknoloji hakkındaki temel bilgi ve görüşleri ile teknolojiye yönelik tutumlarının bazı değişkenler açısından araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Muğla.

  11. Elmarzugi, N. A., Keleb, E. I., Mohamed, A. T., Benyones, H. M., Bendala, N. M., Mehemed, A. I. ve Eid, A. M. (2014). Awareness of Libyan students and academic staff members of nanotechnology. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 4(06), 110-114.

  12. Enil, G. ve Köseoğlu, Y. (2016). Fen bilimleri (fizik, kimya ve biyoloji) öğretmen adaylarının nanoteknoloji farkındalık düzeyleri, ilgileri ve tutumlarının araştırılması. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(1), 61-77.

  13. Floyd-Smith, T., Baah, D., Bean, K., Hollinger, A., Vickers, D., & York, J. (2009). Principles of nanotechnology for middle and high school students, Journal of Materials Education, 31(3-4), 167–174.

  14. Hutchinson, K., Bodner, G. M., & Bryan, L. (2011). Middle-and high-school students’ interest in nanoscale science and engineering topics and phenomena. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(1), 4.

  15. İpek, Z., Atik, A. D., Tan, S., & Erkoç, F. (2020). Awareness, exposure, and knowledge levels of science teachers about nanoscience and nanotechnology. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 134-155.

  16. Jones, M. G., Broadwall, B., Falvo, M., Minogue, J., & Oppewal, T. (2005). It’s a small world after all. Science and Children, 43(2), 44–46.

  17. Knobel, M., Murriello, S. E., Bengtsson, A., Cascón, A., & Zysler, R. (2010). The perception of nanoscience and nanotechnology by children and teenagers. Journal of Materials Education, 32(1-2), 29-38.

  18. Kulinowski, K. M. (2006). Incorporating nanotechnology into K-12 education. M.C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge, (Ed.), Nanotechnology: Societal Implications - Individual Perspectives, (ss. 322-327), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer

  19. Kumar, D. D. (2007). The nanoscale science in technology and teaching. Australian Journal of Education and Chemistry, 68, (20-22).

  20. Kumar, D. D., & Kerr, R. (2008). K-12 science education in nanotechnology: Examples using computer-based laboratory instrumentation. In A. E. Sweeney & S. Seal (Eds.), Nanoscale science and engineering education (pp. 49–56). Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Scientific Publishers.

  21. Kumar, D. D., Lapp, S. I., Marinaccio, P., & Scarola, K. (2008). Science literacy strategies anchored in nanotechnology. School Science Review, 89(329), 63–73.

  22. Kumar, D. D., & Maslin-Ostrowski, P. (2008). Policy considerations for nanoscience education. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5-6), 385–388.

  23. Kumar, D. D., & Scarola, K. (2006). Nanotechnology and closed-captioned videos: Improving opportunities for teaching science to ESL students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v7_issue2Kumar/index.htm

  24. Laherto, A. (2012). NanoScience education for scientific literacy: Opportunities and challenges in secondary school and in out-of-school settings. Doctoral dissertation,University of Helsinki, Finland.

  25. Lagaron, J., Cabedo, L., Cava, D., Feijoo, J., Gavara, R., & Gimenez, E. (2005). Improving packaged food quality and safety. Part 2: Nanocomposites. Food additives And Contaminants, 22(10), 994-998. doi: 10.1080/02652030500239656

  26. Mei, L., McClements, D., Wu, J., & Decker, E. (1998). Iron-catalyzed lipid oxidation in emulsion as affected by surfactant, pH and NaCl. Food Chemistry, 61(3), 307-312. doi: 10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00058-7.

  27. National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2001). Nanotechnology and you. Retrieved from http://www.nano.gov/html/gacts/faqs.html.

  28. Nikalje, A. (2015). Nanotechnology and its applications in medicine. Medicinal Chemistry, 5(2). doi: 10.4172/2161-0444.1000247.

  29. Roco, M. (2008). Nanotechnology in the United States and the National Science Foundation [Electronic presentation]. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/docs/irishnano.pdf.

  30. Roco, M., & Bainbridge, W. (2001). International strategy for nanotechnology research and development. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/connections/international/1jnr_int.doc.

  31. Sagun-Gököz, B. ve Akaygün, S. (2013). Üniversiteden liseye uzanan köprü: Bir nanobilim atölye çalışması. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 31(2), 49-72.

  32. Simpson, R. D., Koballa, T. R., Oliver, J. S., & Crawley, F. E. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211–234). New York, NY: The National Science Teachers Association.

  33. Sweeney, A. E. & Seal, S. (Eds.) (2008). Nanoscale science and engineering education. Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Scientific Publishers.

  34. Şenocak, E. (2014). A survey on nanotechnology in the view of the Turkish public. Science Technology & Society, 19(1), 79–94.

  35. Tessman, J. M. (2009). Students' conceptions of nanoscience phenomena: The beginning of a nanoscience concept inventory. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.

  36. Yurick, K. A., (2001). Effects of Problem Based Learning with Web-Anchored Instruction in Nanotechnology on the Science Conceptual Understanding, the Attitude Towards Science, and the Perception on Science in Society of Elementary Students, . Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Florida.

  37. Zhang, Z., & Feng, S. (2006). The drug encapsulation efficiency, in vitro drug release, cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of paclitaxel-loaded poly(lactide)–tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate nanoparticles. Biomaterials, 27(21), 4025-4033. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.006