Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 10 February 2021
The Power of a Doodling Brain: Concept Maps as Pathways to Learning
Milagros I. Rivera Cora, Soledad Gonzales, Matilde Sarmiento, Alejandra Esparza Young, Edith Esparza, Nikolina Madjer, Pinaikini Shankar, Yadmarie Rivera, Isaac Abulatan
University of Medicine and Health Sciences St. Kitts, Oyster Adams Bilingual School Washington, D.C., Stanford University
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Concept Mapping, Teaching/Learning, Critical Thinking
Children begin to emulate writing and what they see around them at a very early age (Byington & Kim, 2017). The simple scribbles they begin to produce are representations of complex cognitive processes occurring. The constant cognitive scaffolding which medical students experience can be compared to the cognitive process children participate in when they doodle, this could be aiding them to visualize and to efficiently create concept maps as adults to learn key concepts and to quickly make connections. The ability to visualize and to understand the relationship of critically important medical concepts remains an invaluable skill which can be reflected through diagramming, concept mapping and doodling.
Adnan, W., Daud, N., & Noor, N. (2008). Expressive Information Visualization Taxonomy for Decision Support Environment. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 88-93. doi: 10.1109/ICCIT.2008.330.
Ahn, J.-W., & Brusilovsky, P. (2009). Adaptive visualization of search results: Bringing user models to visual analytics. Information Visualization, 8(3), 167-179.
Alamargot, D., & Morin, M. F. (2015). Does handwriting on a tablet screen affect students’ graphomotor execution? A comparison between Grades Two and Nine. Human movement science, 44, 32–41.
Alias, M., & Tukiran, A. (2006). The effect of teacher generated concept maps on learning of secondary school physics. In A. J. Ca-as & J. D. Novak (Eds.) Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, (Vol. 1, pp. 550-557). San José, Costa Rica.
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer.
Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of Advancements in Brain Research and Technology for Writing Development, Writing Instruction, and Educational Evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). The Guilford Press.
Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). A critical review of argument visualization tools: Do users become better reasoners? In F. Grasso, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the ECAI-06 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, 67-75.
Bromley, K., Irwin-DeVitis, L. & Modlo, M. (1999). 50 graphic organizers for reading, writing & more: Reproducible templates, student samples, and easy strategies to support every learner. New York, NY: Scholastic Professional Books.
D'Antoni, A. V., (2009), Relationship Between the Mind Map Learning Strategy and Critical Thinking in Medical Students. (Publication No. 1372) [Doctoral Dissertation, Seton Hall University]. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs).
Eppler, M. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202-210.
Ermis, S. (2008). Using graphic organizers to facilitate elementary students' comprehension of informational text. In M. Foote, F. Falk-Ross, S. Szabo, & M. B. Sampson (Eds.), College Reading Association yearbook: Vol. 29. Navigating the literacy waters: Research, praxis, and advocacy, 87–102. College Reading Association.
Fisher, A. (2001). Implementing Graphic Organizer Notebooks: The Art and Science of Teaching Content. The Reading Teacher, 55(2), 116-120.
Hatano, A., Sekine, T., Herai, T., Ihara, N., Tanaka, Y., Murakami, S., & Kinugawa, S. (2015). Effects of the use of paper notebooks and tablet devices on cognitive load in learning-An Electroencephalographic (EEG) study. IEICE Technic. Rep. 115(185), 39–44.
Horton, S., Lovitt, T., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12-29.
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32–42.
Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N. M., Hille, K., & Sachse, S. (2015). Handwriting or Typewriting? The Influence of Pen- or Keyboard-Based Writing Training on Reading and Writing Performance in Preschool Children. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(4), 136–146.
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., & Velay, J. L. (2008). Learning through hand- or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 20(5), 802–815.
Mangen, A., Anda, L. G., Oxborough, G. H., & Brønnick, K. (2015). Handwriting versus keyboard writing: effect on word recall. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 227–247. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.1
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168.
Ong, J. C., Arand, D., Schmitz, M., Baron, K., Blackburn, R., Grandner, M. A., Lichstein, K. L., Nowakowski, S., Teixeira, C., Boling, K., C. Dawson, S., & Hansen, K. (2018). A Concept Map of Behavioral Sleep Medicine: Defining the Scope of the Field and Strategic Priorities. Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 16(6), 523–526.
Potgieser A. R. E., Van der Hoorn A., & De Jong B. M. (2015). Cerebral activations related to writing and
Robinson, D., Beth, A., Odom, S., Hsieh, Y.-P., Vanderveen, A., & Katayama, A. (2006). Increasing text comprehension and graphic note taking using a partial graphic organizer. The Journal of Educational Research, 103-111.
Simmons, D., Griffin, C., & Kameenui, E. (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre- and post- graphic organizer instruction on sixth-grade science students' comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Research, 82(1), 15-21.
Stevenson, N. C., & Just, C. (2014). In early education, why teach handwriting before keyboarding? Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 49–56.
Struble, J. (2007). Using graphic organizers as formative assessment. Science Scope, 30(5) 69-71.
Sumner, T., Ahmad, F., Bhushan, S., Gu, Q., Molina, F., Willard, S., Wright, M., Davis, D., & Janée, G. (2005). Linking learning goals and educational resources through interactive concept map visualizations. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5(1), 18-24.
Torre, D., Daley, B. J., Picho, K., & Durning, S. J. (2017). Group concept mapping: An approach to explore group knowledge organization and collaborative learning in senior medical students. Medical Teacher, 39(10), 1051–1056.
van der Meer, A. L. H., and van der Weel, F. R. (2017). Only three fingers write, but the whole brain works: a high-density EEG study showing advantages of drawing over typing for learning. Frontiers in psychology. 8,706.
Wang, Y., Teoh, S. T., & Ma, K.-L. (2006). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tree Visualization Systems for Knowledge Discovery. Proceedings of Eurographics Visualization Symposium, 67-74.