Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 10 October 2022

The Relationship Between Principals' Technological Leadership Competence and School Effectiveness

Öğr. Üyesi Muhammet Baki MİNAZ, Yusuf ÖZEL, Mustafa AY

Sakarya Üniversitesi (Turkey), Akoba İlkokulu (Turkey), Koçaklar İlkokulu (Turkey)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.570

Pages: 39-57

Keywords: Effective School, Technological Leadership, Educational Institutions, Educational Manager, Instructional Leader

Abstract

The study results revealed no statistically significant difference in teachers’ perceptions of principals’ technological leadership and school effectiveness in terms of teachers’ gender, seniority, branch, working time at the current school, technological competence, and daily technology use. However, the findings showed a significant difference in the perceptions of technological leadership by age but not in the perceptions of school effectiveness. The analysis results revealed a strong or very strong correlation between the technological leadership and its sub-dimensions and the school effectiveness sub-dimensions. It was found that a positive increase in any sub-dimension of the technological leadership scale improved school effectiveness, and there was a significantly positive and very high relationship between school effectiveness and technological leadership. As technological leadership increased, so did school effectiveness. Accordingly, technological leadership explained 50.8% of the change in school effectiveness. Principals’ technological leadership, mediated by teachers' technological literacy, affected teaching and school effectiveness.

References

  1. Abdurrezzak, S. (2015). Exploring teachers' perceptions of effective school and school leadership. (Master’s thesis). Cumhuriyet University

  2. Ada, S.Z. and Baysal, N. (2015). Turkish Education System and Effective School Management (3. Edition.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  3. Akbaba-Altun, S. (2002). A study on examining school administrators’ attitudes towards technology. Çağdaş Eğitim,286, 8-14.

  4. Akgün, N. (2001). The instructional leadership of primary school principals(Unpublished ph. D thesis), Abant İzzet Baysal Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.

  5. Akıllı, E. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between the management effectiveness and technological leadership level of school managers according to perceptions of teachers. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  6. Alkrdem, M. (2014). Technological leadership behavior of high school headteachers in Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Journal of İnternational Education Research (JIER), 10(2), 95-100.

  7. Aktaş, N. (2016). Investigation of technology leadership roles of secondary school institutions. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  8. Alm, S., Låftman, S. B., Sandahl, J., & Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and students' future orientation: A multilevel analysis of upper secondary schools in Stockholm, Sweden. Journal of Adolescence, 70, 62-73.

  9. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. The Quarterly Journal of Educational Management, 40, 49-82.

  10. Aşçı, G. (2017). Teachers' attitude towards school principals' technology leadership behavior and its effect on teacher performance. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bahçeşehir University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  11. Atılgan, N. (2019). The relationship between distributed leadership characteristics and school effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation).

  12. Balcı, A. (2013). Effective school and school development: Theory, Practice, and Research: Method, Technique and Principles. 5. Edition. PEGEM A Publishing

  13. Balcı, A. (2007). Effective school and school development. Pegem A.

  14. Banoğlu, K. (2011). School principals’ technology leadership competency and technology coordinatorship Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 199-213.

  15. Barış, B. (2002). Effects of behavior management policies used in elementary schools on the school improvement process. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Educational Sciences

  16. Baybara, M. (2018). The competencies of private and state elementary school administrators regarding their technology leadership roles (Master's thesis, the Institute of Social Sciences).

  17. Bayrak, S. Power and power management in organizations as a neglected subject-II- Süleyman Demirel University the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Y.2001. C.6, S. 1 s.23-42.

  18. Beycioğlu, K. (2011). School principals’ technology leadership competency and technology coordinatorship. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 199-213.

  19. Biçer, F. S. (2019). The comparison of school administrators’ and information technologies guidance teachers’ technology leadership proficiencies. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  20. Bolanle, A. O. (2013). Principals' Leadership Skills and School Effectiveness: The Case of South Western Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 3(5), 26-33.

  21. Bolat, T., Seymen, O.A., Bolat, O., & Erdem, B. (2015). Management and organization. 6. Edition, Ankara: Detay Publishing.

  22. Boonla, D., & Treputtharat, S. (2014). The relationship between the leadership style and school effectiveness in school under the office of secondary education area 20. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 991-996.

  23. Bostancı, H. (2010). Examination of principals’ technological leadership competence (Master’s thesis). Gazi University Institute of Informatics.

  24. Bülbül, T., & Çuhadar, C. (2012). Analysis of the relationship between school administrators’ perceptions of technology leadership self-efficacy and their acceptance of ICT. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(23), 474-499.

  25. Can, H. (1994). Organization and management. Ankara: Adım Publishing

  26. Can, T. (2003). Technological leadership competencies of elementary school principals in Bolu. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2 (3), 94-107.

  27. Cantürk, G. (2016). School administrators' technological leadership behaviors and the relationship among usage of information and communication technology in management processes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Akdeniz University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  28. Cerit, Y., & Yıldırım, B. (2017). The Relationship Between Primary School Principals’ Effective Leadership Behaviors and School Effectiveness. Bartın University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(3), 902-914.

  29. Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary. Journal of educational technology & society, 15(2), 328-340.

  30. Çalık, T., Çoban, Ö. & Özdemir, N. (2019). Examining the Relationship between School Administrators' Technological Leadership Self-efficacy and Personality Treats. Ankara University the Institute Journal of Educational Sciences. Year: 2019, Vol: 52, Issue: 1, 83-106

  31. Çetin, N. G. and Beceren, E. (2007). Leader personality: Gandhi. Süleyman Demirel University the Institute journal of Social Sciences, 3(5), 110-132.

  32. Çıkrık, S. (2020). Teachers’ views on principals’ technology leadership competencies.Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  33. Çubukçu, Z., & Girmen, P. (2006). Levels of effectiveness characteristics in secondary schools. Manas University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(16), 121-136.

  34. Deeboonmee, W., & Ariratana, W. (2014). Relationship between strategic leadership and school Effectiveness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 982-985.

  35. Demir, R. Leadership and motivation. İstanbul University Open and Distance Education Publishing, 2016

  36. Deniz, L., and Teke, S. (2020). An evaluation of teacher views on school principals’ technology leadership roles. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 17(1), 351-373.

  37. Deniz, M., & Çolak, M. (2008). Power at conflict management in organizations and a sample study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 7(23), 304-325.

  38. Demirsoy, S. (2016). The relationship between technological pedagogical knowledge of teachers and school administrators’ technological leadership competencies. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University Institute of Social Sciences.

  39. Dinç, H. (2019). Technology leadership competencies of school principals. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Düzce University Institute of Social Sciences.

  40. Durnalı, M. (2018). The views of teachers on technological leadership behaviors of school principals and school knowledge management (Doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, the Institute of Educational Sciences

  41. Esplin, N. (2017). Utah elementary school principals’ preparation as technology leaders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan.

  42. Genç, N., & Halis, M. (2006). Quality Leadership. İstanbul: Timaş Publishing

  43. Gerçek, M. M. (2016). The investigation of the correlation between school administrators’ level of technological leadership and their effectiveness, as measured by the perception of teachers in private schools. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Science.

  44. Görgülü, D., Küçükali, R., & Ada, Ş (2013). Technologic leadership self-efficacy of the school administrators. Educational Technology, Theory, and Practice, 3(2), 53-71.

  45. Gürfidan, H. (2017). The Impact of School Culture, Technology Leadership, and Support Services on Teachers’ Technology Integration: A Structural Equation Modeling (Master's thesis, the Institute of Educational Sciences).

  46. Irmak, M. (2015). Primary and Secondary School Teachers' Perceptions Regarding Directors' Level of Technology Leadership (Master's thesis, Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences).

  47. Kılınç, T. (2009). Effective leadership. İstanbul: Kariyer Publishing.

  48. Kurt, İ. (2019). Teachers’ views about high school principals’ technological leadership competence. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences.

  49. Matthews, A. W. (2002). Technology leadership at a junior high school: A qualitative case study (Doctoral dissertation)—the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States.

  50. Özdemir, S. (2000). Organizational innovation in education. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.

  51. Özdemir, S. and Sezgin, F. (2002). Effective schools and instructional leadership. Manas University Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (16), 266-282.

  52. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organization. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  53. Kanmaz, A., & Uyar, L. (2016). The effect of school efficiency of secondary schools on student achievement. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 3(2), 123-136.

  54. Karslı, M. D. (2004). Managerial Competence. Pegem A Publishing.

  55. Kırlıoğlu, İ. (2021). Investigation of the level of technological leadership of school principals according to teachers. (Master’s thesis). Sabahattin Zaim University Graduate Education Institute.

  56. Lazaridou, A., & Iordanides, G. (2011). The principal's role in achieving school effectiveness. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 39(3).

  57. Mcleod, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2011). The dearth of technology leadership coverage. Journal of school leadership, 21(2), 216-240.

  58. Mulyani, H., Meirawan, D., & Rahmadani, A. (2020). Increasing school effectiveness through principals’ leadership and teachers’ teaching performance, is it possible? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 279-292.

  59. Oral, Ş. (2005). An assessment of primary schools in terms of effectiveness (the case of Batman) Master’s thesis. Dicle University, the Institute of Social Sciences, the Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning, and Economics.

  60. Öztürk, D. (2021). Examining the technological leadership self-competence of high school principals (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University (Turkey).

  61. Raman, A., Thannimalai, R., & İsmail, S. N. (2019). Principals' Technology Leadership and Its Effect on Teachers' Technology Integration in 21st Century Classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 423-442.

  62. Sabuncuoğlu, Z. & Tokol, T. Management. Bursa: Ezgi Publishing, 2001.

  63. Sağbaş, H. (2019). Examining elementary school administrators’ technological leadership competence (Doctoral dissertation, Masters’ thesis. Ege University).

  64. Seven, T. (2021). The relationship between school managers’ technological leadership self-efficiency and their distance education attitudes (Master's thesis, İstanbul Kültür University/Graduate Education Institution/the Department of Educational Sciences/Educational Administration and Planning).

  65. Sezer, B. & Deryakulu, D. (2012). The competencies of elementary school administrators regarding their technology leadership roles. Educational Technology, Theory, and Practice, 2(2), 74-92.

  66. Sincar, M. & Aslan, B. (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about school administrators’ technology leadership roles. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (1), 571 – 595.

  67. Sincar, M. (2009). An analysis of Turkish elementary school administrators’ technology leadership roles (Doctoral dissertation). Malatya: İnönü University Institute of Social Sciences

  68. Şahin, H. (2014) Assessment of school administrators of technology leadership views regarding the role of principals and teachers. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Zirve University, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Institute of Social Sciences,

  69. Şahin, F. (2020). The impact of school administrator’s technological leadership on effectiveness and academic success of school (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University (Turkey).

  70. Şenel, T., & Buluç, B. (2016). The relationship between organizational climate and school effectiveness in primary schools. Journal of TUBAV Science, 9(4), 1-12.

  71. Şişman, M. (2002). Searching for excellence: Effective schools. Ankara: Pegema Publishing.

  72. Şişman, M. (2014). Instructional Leadership. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  73. Turan, S. (2002). The role of an educational manager in the effective use of technology in school management. The Journal of Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 271-281.

  74. Türkoğlu, H. (2002). “The perception level as regards learning organizations of the principals and teachers working in primary schools”. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Ankara: Gazi University. The Institute of Educational Sciences.

  75. Valdez, G. (2004). Critical issue: Technology leadership: Enhancing positive educational change. Retrieved on February 6, 2013, http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/leadrshp/le700.htm.

  76. Wagen Van Der L. (2007). Human resource management for events. First Edition. USA: Elsevier Ltd.

  77. Weng, C. H., & Tang, Y. (2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 76, 91-107.

  78. Yağız, M. S. (2016). Investigation of the levels of primary schools that have effective school characteristics (Master's thesis, Hasan Kalyoncu University).

  79. Yıldırım, İ. (2015). An analysis of school managers’ personality and locus of control traits in regard to teachers’ job satisfaction and effectiveness of schools. Atatürk University

  80. Yılmaz H. (2011). Empowering Leadership. E. 1. İstanbul: Beta Publishing.

  81. Yumlu, E. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between school administrators' technological leadership qualifications and school efficiency (Master's thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Graduate Education Institute, the Department of Educational Sciences).

  82. Yumuşak, H., & Korkmaz, M. (2021). The relationship between leadership ad school effectiveness levels: A meta-analysis study. Erciyes Journal of Education, 5(2), 123-149.

  83. Zaleznik, A. (1998). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review on Leadership, Harvard Business School Press,