Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 15 December 2022
The Relationship between Teachers' Motivation and Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Perceived Principal Management Style
Öznur Tulunay Ateş, Özgür Türk
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Motivation, Organizational Commitment, Perceived Principal Management Style, Structural Equity Modeling, Mediation Role
In this study, it is aimed to examine the mediating role of school principals' management styles in the relationship between teachers' motivation and organizational commitment. In the study, teachers working at all levels of education in public schools in the city center of Isparta in the 2021/2022 academic year constitute the universe. Simple random sampling method was preferred in the selection of the study group and data were collected from 962 teachers who volunteered. At the end of the extreme values, normality and multiple normality controls in the data set, 933 teachers were determined as the study group of the research. The perceived principal management style scale developed by Üstüner (2016), the organizational commitment scale for teachers developed by Üstüner (2009) and the adult motivation scale developed by Tulunay Ateş and İhtiyaroğlu (2019) were used as data collection tools in the research. The model established regarding the mediating role of management style in the relationship between teachers' motivation and organizational commitment was tested with the structural equation model. The demographic information, reliability coefficients and correlation values between the variables of the research participants were analyzed by SPSS 22, and the structural equation modeling was analyzed by LISREL 8.80. According to the research findings, relations between teachers' motivation, organizational commitment and perceived principal management style were determined. In addition, according to another finding of the research, the perceived principal management style has a partial mediating role in the relationship between teachers' motivation and organizational commitment. According to these findings, it can be interpreted that the effect of school principals' management style should be taken into account in increasing teachers' motivation and organizational commitment.
Abdurrezzak, S., & Üstüner, M. (2020). The effect of principal management style and intrinsic motivation on teachers’ organizational commitment. Trakya Journal of Education, 10(1), 151-168.
Ada, Ş., Akan, D. , Ayık, A. , Yıldırım, İ., & Yalçın, S. (2014). Motivation factors of teachers. Journal of Atatürk University Social Sciences Institute, 17(3), 151-166.
Ağca, N. (2014). The effect of managerial behaviors on teachers' organizational commitment: the case of tekirdağ aka college (Master Term Project). Namık Kemal University.
Austen, A., & Zacny, B. (2015). The role of public service motivation and organizational culture for organizational commitment. Management. 19(2), 21-34.
Bahrami, M., Aghaei, A., Barati, O., Tafti, A.D., & Ezzatabadi, M.R. (2016). Job motivation potential score and its relationship with employees’ organizational commitment among health professionals. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 1/6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2016.04.001
Balay, R. (2014). Organizational commitment in administrators and teachers. Pegem Akademi.
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education,20, 277–289.
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1987). New structure and behavior in school administration. Ankara University Faculty of Education Publications.
Canbaba, İ. E. (2019). The relationship between employee motivation and organizational commitment: A study in three, four and five star hotels in Erzincan and Erzurum (Master Thesis). Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University.
Cansu, R. (2019). Examining the effects of school administrators with innovative management characteristics on teachers' motivation and organizational commitment (Master Thesis). Istanbul Aydın University.
Celep, C., Bülbül, T., & Tunç, B. (2000). Organizational commitment focus of novice teachers. Trakya University Journal of Scientific Research 1(1), 87-94.
Cemaloğlu, N. (2002). The role of the school administrator in increasing teacher performance. Journal of National Education, 153-154.
Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323-337.
Çetinkaya, B. (2018). Hayat bir sınavdır sınav kaygısı ve motivasyon. Pegem Akademi.
Çokluk, Ö. S., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2012). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: Spss and Lisrel applications. Pegem.
Danetta, V. (2002). What factors influence a teacher's commitment to student learning? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(2), 141-177.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12-17.
Demir, İ. (2019). Factors affecting the level of institutional belonging: Manisa Celal Bayar University example (Master Thesis). Balikesir University.
Demirel, K. (2020). Organizational commitment of administrators and teachers according to the degree of realization of human resource management functions in private schools (Master Thesis). Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
Dogani, O. (2010). Yönetim bilinci ve motivasyon. Karma Kitaplar Basın Yayın.
Elliott, R., & Crosswell, L. (2004). Committed teachers, passionate teachers: the dimension of passion associated with teacher commitment and engagement. In Jeffrey, Ruth (Ed.) Australia, Vic. Melbourne, pp. 1-12
Erdil, O., Keskin, H., İmamoğlu, S.Z., & Erat, S. (2004). The relationship between supervision style, working conditions, co-workers behavior, recognition and job satisfaction: a field research on textile fi