The Suitability of EAP Textbooks to the Learning Needs in Chinese Context—From a Pre-Use Perspective

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

Published: 06 May 2019

The Suitability of EAP Textbooks to the Learning Needs in Chinese Context—From a Pre-Use Perspective

Ning Dali

Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1993.02.02.63

Pages: 305-320

Keywords: Textbook Suitability, EAP, Learning Needs, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate textbook has always been a great concern of teachers and students. Frameworks for the evaluation of textbook in previous researches are too complex to help a quick decision. This paper firstly gives an account of Chinese students' needs in learning EAP. It then proposes a framework for the suitability of the textbook and applies it to three textbooks for meeting the learning needs in the Chinese context. The result shows that domestically designed textbooks are, to some extent, inexperienced in the arrangement of content and academic skills, and even in the understanding of the nature of EAP learning. It also reveals that the imported classical textbook though quite experienced and shows general good suitability presents some problems in its suitability to a particular culture. Given the limited researches on EAP textbooks, this study sheds light on the selection and construction of EAP textbook in the Chinese context.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York, N.Y: Longman.

  2. Anderson, L. W. (2005). Objectives, evaluation, and the improvement of education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2), 102–113

  3. Ann-Katrin van den Ham, Aiso Heinze, (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133-140

  4. Arlan, R. S., & Sahin-kizil, A. (2010). How Can the Use of Blog Software Facilitate the Writing Process of English Language Learners? Commuter Assisted Language Learning, 3, 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486575

  5. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay Company.

  6. Cai Jigang. (2012). The Design and Illustration of the EAP-Oriented Guidelines for EFL Teaching at Tertiary Level. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 4, 1-9,41

  7. Cai Jigang. (2014). Brand new teaching philosophy and methodology: a study of English for academic purposes and College English. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 2, 1-7,45, 94

  8. Cai Jigang. (2016). Theoretical Foundations of EAP as an Independent Course in Chinese Tertiary Education. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 2, 9-16

  9. Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. Cbe-life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368–381.

  10. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

  11. Chazal, E. de & L. Rodgers. Oxford EAP (Intermediate/B2)Oxford University Press, 2012. Ding Yan. (2016). EGAP Textbooks in China: Problems and Solutions. Foreign Languages in China, 7(2):85-91.

  12. Dudley-Evans, T. & M. J. St John. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  13. Edeward de Chazal & Sam McCarter. (2012). Oxford EAP. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  14. Flowerdew & M. Peacock eds. (2001). Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177-194.

  15. Jessica Williams, Kristine Brown, Susan Hood, (2017). Academic Encounters: Life in Society. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, Shanghai, China.

  16. Johns, A. M. English for specific purposes (ESP): Its history and contributions. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed, 8). (1991 ). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. 67-75.

  17. He Jiabao. (2014). Needs Analysis and Evaluation of EAP Courses for Chinese College Students, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wu Han, China.

  18. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purpose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031

  19. Hyland. K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.

  20. Jukka Törnroos, (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31 (4), 315-327

  21. Lau, Kwok Hung, Lam, Tri, Kam, Booi Hon Kam, Mathews Nkhoma, Joan Richardson, Susan Thomas. (2018). The role of textbook learning resources in e-learning: A taxonomic study. Computers & Education, 118: 10-24

  22. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

  23. Liao Leizhao, Cai Jigang. (2017). Transcending GE: A study of the writing principles of college ESP teaching materials. Foreign Language Education in China (Quarterly), 10 (4):17-24

  24. Liu Rui, Zhang Laixiang, Yan Pengfei. (2014). A Study on EAP Needs Analysis of Students in Universities of Science and Technology, Education Review, (3), 78-80

  25. Luik, Jaan Mikk, (2008). What is important in electronic textbooks for students of different achievement levels? Computers & Education, 50( 4): 1483-1494

  26. Luo Na & Chen Chunmei. (2012). EAP Needs Analysis of Graduate Students of Science and Technology from the Mentors’ Perspective, Contemporary Foreign Language Studies. (5), 38-42

  27. Maria Kuecken, Marie-Anne Valfort, Ann-Katrin van den Ham, Aiso Heinze, (2013). When do textbooks matter for achievement? Evidence from African primary schools Economics Letters, 119(3): 311-315

  28. Nation,I.S.P. (2006).How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82. Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Courduff, J., Carter,K.,&Bennett,D.(2013).Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259–266.

  29. Tang S. (1999). Cooperation or competition: a comparison of U.S and Chinese college students. TheJournall of Psychology, (133), 413—423

  30. Ning Dali. (2017). The Construction of EAP Textbooks in Chinese Context from the Perspective of Eco-education. English Language Teaching, 5, 214-221

  31. Valverde, G., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Netherlands: Springer

  32. Wang Hua. (2018). A survey on the Needs of Academic Spoken English of Chinese College Students, Journal of Xi'an International Studies University, 1, 81-87

  33. Wang Shoureng &Wang Haixio. (2011). On the State of College English Teaching in China and Its Future Development. Foreign Languages in China, (5), 4-11, 17.

  34. Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G.J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers & Education, 58(2), 679–687.

  35. Wang Xiaoli, Lu Yongli, Li Bin. (2014). Theoretical and Empirical Study of Evaluation Index System of. Curriculum, Teaching Materia,  and Method, 34(10), 40-45

  36. Wang Xuehua, Chen Meihua, Li Xiaoxiang, (2015). Transition of College English Teaching Oriented towards EAP——problems and countermeasures. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 4, 55-58, 94

  37. Wang Yan. (2011). On the principles of compiling ESP textbooks. ESP Studies in China. 2(1):106-115

  38. Zhang Jingyuan, Wang Na. (2017). English for General Academic Purposes, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China.

  39. Zhao Yong & Zheng Shutang (2006). A theoretical analysis to the textbook evaluation systems abroad. Foreign Language Education, 27(3):39-45

  40. Zheng Dahu. (2016). The Construction of Multicurricular System of college English Based on Needs Analysis. Foreign Language World, 6, 49-56.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle