Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 18 May 2020
To Declare or Not to Declare [Bankruptcy]: That May Be the Question,
A Tale of Bankruptcy in Higher Education
Richard J. Hunter, Jr, John H. Shannon, Henry J. Amoroso, Hector R. Lozada
Seton Hall University, USA
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Bankruptcy, Reorganization, Examiner, Labor, Automatic Stay, Employment, Title IX
This case study provides the background for a discussion of the bankruptcy of a composite non-profit corporation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and the possible alternatives available to bankruptcy. Topics considered include: reorganizations, the selection of a bankruptcy trustee or an examiner, duties of a non-profit board, the automatic stay, aspects of the creation and confirmation of the bankruptcy plan, priority of creditors, termination of employment contracts for tenured and non-tenured faculty and those faculty represented by a union, at-will employment, and Title IX implications for any bankruptcy filing. The case study then turns to a discussion of options and perspectives available in the case that bankruptcy under Chapter 11 is not seen as a viable or practical alternative. Could the real target of restructuring and cost cutting be academic tenure?
Amsler, J.B., & Boruvka, E. (2019). Teaching democracy through practice: collaborative governance on campus. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2019: 73-109.
Applebaum, A.S. (2019). The new hidden cost of chapter 11. American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 38(3): 32-33.
Bank, J.W. (2019). Representing a business in a workout or bankruptcy. Michigan Bar Journal, 98: 52-54.
Bragg, S. (2018). Debtor in possession. Accounting Tools (June 4, 2018). Retrieved:
Brake, D. (2001). The struggle for sex equality in sport and the theory behind Title IX. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 34: 13-149.
Broude, R.F. (2020). Reorganizations under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. Eagan, Minn.: Law Journal Press.
Bruckner, M. (2017). Why can’t colleges declare bankruptcy? HBCU’s would benefit greatly from chapter 11 reorganization. New York Daily News (March 30, 2017). Retrieved: https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/colleges-declare-bankruptcy-article-1.3013855
Buzuvis, E.E. (2006). Survey says… A critical analysis of the new Title IX policy and a proposal for reform. Iowa Law Review, 91: 821-886.
Cameron, C.D. (1994). How “necessary” became the mother of rejection: an empirical look at the fate of collective bargaining agreements on the tenth anniversary of bankruptcy code section 1113(c). Santa Clara Law Review, 34: 841-943.
Cedrone, M.J. (2019). Supreme silence and precedential pragmatism: King v. Burwelland statutory interpretation in the federal courts of appeals. Marquette Law Review, 103: 43-109.
Chingos, M.M. (2017). Don’t forget private, non-profit colleges. Economic Studies(Evidence Speaks Reports), 2(9): 1-9.
Coco, D. (2019). Third-party bankruptcy releases: an analysis of consent through the lenses of
due process and contract law. Fordham Law Review, 88: 231-265.
Cordry, K. (2020). Affairs of state, textualism, originalism and the code: arguments for a heretical view of section 363. American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 39(2): 20-29.
Fisher, R., Berman, J., Harper, S., & Ayers-Mann, J. (2019). D.C. Circuit denies enforcement of NLRB’s decision applying Pacific Lutheran standard. Employer Labor Relations.com (March 18, 2019). Retrieved:
George, B.G. (1999). Sports law in the 21stcentury: Title IX and the scholarship dilemma. Marquette Sports Law Journal, 9: 273-285.
Goldschmid, H.J. (1998). The fiduciary duties of nonprofit directors & officers: paradoxes, problems, and proposed reforms. Journal of Corporate Law, 234: 631-653.
Harrison, Y., & Murray, V. (2014). Guidelines for improving the effectiveness of boards of directors of nonprofit organizations. Albany, N.Y.: Open SUNY.
Hefferan, J.J. (2016). A sporting chance: Biediger v. Quinnipiac University and what constitutes a sport for purposes of Title IX. Marquette Sports Law Review, 26: 583-670.
Herman, K.A., & Herman, J.A. (2019). Protecting retirement assets from creditors. Journal of the Missouri Bar, 75: 172-204.
Heyman, S.B. (2019). United States Supreme Court surveys: 2017 term digest Reality Trust v. Somers: Whistleblowers and corporate retaliation. Roger Williams University Law Review, 24: 78-103.
Hueske, W. (2013). School’s out forever: Lon Morris College, section 525(a), and revocation of Title IV eligibility for institutions of higher education in bankruptcy. Weil Bankruptcy Blog (April 9, 2013). Retrieved:
Huffman, A.E. (2020). Forgive and forget? An analysis of student loan forgiveness plans. North Carolina Banking Institute, 24: 449-478.
Hunter, R. J., & Shannon, J.H. (2015). Is it time to revisit the Yeshiva decision: the myth of “shared university governance.” International Review of Sciences and Humanities, 9(1): 193-207.
Hunter, R.J., & Shannon, J.H. (2020). A primer on the role of the university’s attorney. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(4): 86-100.
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore. (2020). D.C. Circuit rejects NLRB’s Pacific Lutheran test, reasserts Great Fall’s exemption for determining NLRA exemption for religiously affiliated schools. Lcwlegal.com (March 4, 2020). Retrieved: ’s-Pacific-Lutheran-test
Lippman, E., & Grimmer, T. (2017). Protecting donor restrictions on bequests. The CPA Journal, 87(4): 9-12.
Lipson, J.C. (2010). Understanding failure: examiners and the bankruptcy reorganization of large public companies. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 84: 1-77.
Lipson, J.C. (2018). The secret life of priority: corporate reorganization after Jevic. Washington Law Review, 93: 631-783.
Lubben S. (2019). American business bankruptcy: a primer (Chapters 17 & 20). Northhampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Marshall-Freeman, D., (2017). Title IX’s three-prong test in athletics. National School Boards Association. Retrieved: MarshallFreeman Title IX 3 Prong Test.pdf
Methner, S.E. (2019). A Catholic university approach to campus speech: using constitutional academic freedom to hold the tension of free speech, inclusive diversity, and university identity. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 15: 358-418.
Meyer, R.C. (2020). Legislative update, Small Business Reorganization Act arrives this month. American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 39(2): 8-49.
Nave, G.A. (1985). Collective bargaining agreements in bankruptcy proceedings: Congressional response to Bildisco. University of Illinois Law Review, 1985: 997-315.
Norton, W.L. (2004). Norton bankruptcy law and practice, 4: Section 79.23. Eagan, Minn.: Thompson Reuters (Westlaw).
Parker, M. & Park, S. (2015). The impact of Pacific Lutheran on collective bargaining at catholic colleges and universities. Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy (The Keep), 7(1): Article 3. Retrieved:
Pasquale, K., Siegel, J., & Lee, O. (2015). The rejection and modification of collective bargaining agreements pursuant to bankruptcy code section 1113. Norton Annual Survey of Bankruptcy Law: 113-159.
Payne, A.M. (2019). What the hack? Reexamining the duty of oversight in an age of data breaches. Georgia Law Review, 53: 727-769.
Rimbach, J. (2020). NJ colleges will partially refund students sent home due to coronavirus.
Schlagel, C., & Averch, C. (2020). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: a bundle of rights theory of enforceability of chapter 11 voting assignments. American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 28: 1-38.
Schmidt, A. (2019). Litigator’s perspective, is under oath enough? American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 36(9): 18-58.
Seltzer, R.M., & Ciantra, T.N. (2007). The future of labor through the prism of bankruptcy: the return of government by the injunction in airline bankruptcies.American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 15: 499-535.
Seton Hall University. (2018). Faculty Guide. Seton Hall University. Retrieved: 12)
Shachmurove, A. (2019). Escape from pandemonium: Reconciling section 363(f) and section 365(h) in Qualitech’s shadow and Spanish Peak’s wake. American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 27: 181-263.
Spizman, L., & Kane, J. (1990). Chapter 11 bankruptcy and the termination of collective bargaining contracts. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3(4): 277-284.
Strub, M.H., & Reisner, J.M. (2020). Section 507: a re-examination of the rules of property rights and post-petition gifting in bankruptcy. Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 28: 93-134.
Temin, M.L., & Chovanes, M.B. (2020). Venue in small-value preference cases after SBRA: Congress should have amended 28 U.S.C. Section 1409(b). American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 39(4): 38-84.
Trautman, L.J., & Ford, J. (2019). Nonprofit governance: the basics. Akron Law Review, 52(4): 971-1042.
West, M.S. (1986). Life after Bildisco: Section 1113 and the duty to bargain in good faith. Ohio State Law Journal, 47: 65-161.
Willborn, S., et al. (2012). Employment law: Cases and Materials (5thed.). New York: Lexis-Nexis.
Wong, D. (2010). Chapter 11 bankruptcy cramdown and the contract rate approach. Northwestern University Law Review, 106(4): 1927-1958.
Zaretsky, B. (1993). Symposium on bankruptcy: Chapter 11 issues: trustees and examiners in chapter 11. South Carolina Law Review, 4: 907-962.
Biediger v. Quinnipiac University (2009). 616 F. Supp 2d 277 (United States District Court,
District of Connecticut)
Cathcart v. Micale (2019). 402 F. Supp. 3d 110 (United States District Court, Eastern District of
Cejka v. Vectrus Sys. Corp. (2018). 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173599 (United States District
Court, District of Colorado)
Cohen v. Brown University (1993). 991 F.2d 888 (United States Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit)
Grove City College v. Bell (1984). 465 U.S. 555 (United States Supreme Court)
In re Baldwin United Corp. (1984). 47 B.R. 898 (United States District Court, Southern District
In re Baldwin-United Corporation (1985). 57 B.R. 759 (United States District Court, Southern
District of Ohio)
In re Betty Owen School, Inc. (1996). 195 B.R. 23 (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern
istrict of New York)
In re Big Rivers Elec. Corp. (2004). 355 F.3d 415 (United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit)
In re Bricksin (2006). 346 B.R. 497 (United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of
In re Lon Morris College (2012). Case No. 12-60557 (United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern
District of Texas)
In re Roth American Industries (1992). 975 F.2d 949 (United States Court of Appeals, 3rd
In re Tighe Merchantile (1986). 62 B.R. 995 (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District
In re Wabash Valley Power Ass’n. (1996). 72 F.3d 1305 (United States Court of Appeals, 7th
Kapp v. Naturelle, Inc. (1979). 611 F.2d 703 (United States Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit)
Lucio v. Fern at Tenth LLC (2019). 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174330 (United States District
Court, Southern District of Texas, Mcallen Division)
NLRB v. Bildisco (1984). 465 U.S. 513 (United States Supreme Court)
NLRB v. Pacific Lutheran University (2014). 19-RC-102521, 361 NLRB 1404. (National Labor
NLRB v. Yeshiva University (1980). 444 U.S. 672 (United States Supreme Court)
Smith v. Safety-Kleen Sys. (2019). 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23806 (United States District Court,
Western District of Pennsylvania)
Smith v. Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. (2020). 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12479 (United States Court
of Appeals, 2ndCircuit)
USC v. NLRB (2019). No. 17-1149 (United States Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit)
SELECT STATUTORY MATERIALS
Cal. Corp. Code Section 5239(a): No personal liability for certain volunteers
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (2012). 20 U.S.C. Section 1681.
H.R. Rep. No. 109-31, pt. 1, at 145 (2005): Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005
National Labor Relations Act (1935, as amended). 29 U.S.C. Sections 151- 169.
N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law Section 720-a: No personal liability for certain volunteers
Title IX of the Educational Amendments (1972). 20 U.S.C. Â§1681 et seq.
Tower Amendment (1974). 120 Congressional Record 15: 322-323.
U.S. Code Title 11— BANKRUPTCY (The Bankruptcy Act, 2019)
20 U.S.C. Section 1002(a)(4)(A): Title IV eligibility
28 U.S.C. Section 1930(a)(6): Bankruptcy fees.
42 U.S.C. Section 14503(a): Limitation on Liability for (Non-Profit) Volunteers