Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 16 August 2021

A Comparative Study on Turkey’s Science and Technology (S&T) Indicators

Evrim Gemici, Zafer Gemici

Yildiz Technical University, Turkey

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.04.03.376

Pages: 126-143

Keywords: Innovation, Science and Technology Indicators, Turkey’s Performance, Research and Development

Abstract

Science and technology (S&T) indicators are important in evaluating how successful countries are in factors described by endogenous growth models. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to investigate S&T indicators of Turkey in a comparative and more hitherto comprehensive study and to present a guiding reference for researchers and decision makers working on innovation and technology policies. This study was carried out using online databases such as those of the OECD, World Bank, Eurostat, and TÜİK considering the criteria used in the literature to measure countries’ R&D and innovation performances, and Turkey’s innovative performance is presented in comparison with the world’s by summarizations within the scope of the study. The results demonstrate that Turkey has made significant progress in the last 20 years in terms of R&D and innovation, but it is still far from reaching the indicators of developed countries. In particular, the increase in R&D and innovation performance has decreased due to the economic difficulties experienced in the world and in Turkey after 2012 and 2013. Based on the indicators evaluated in this study, some suggestions are given and prioritized to increase Turkey’s innovation performance.

References

  1. Abdon, A., Felipe, J., & Kumar, U. (2012). Tracking the Middle Income Trap: What is It, Who is in It, and Why?(No. 715).

  2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica,60(2), 323. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599

  3. Ahmad, F. (1993). The Making of Modern Turkey. Routledge.

  4. Bresser-Pereira, L. C., Araújo, E. C., & Costa Peres, S. (2020). An alternative to the middle-income trap. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.11.007

  5. Candan, T., & Yurdadog, V. (2017). Türki̇ye’de mali̇ye poli̇ti̇kasi araci olarak teşvi̇k poli̇ti̇kalari. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27.

  6. Cannon, E. (2000). Human capital: level versus growth effects. Oxford Economic Papers, 52(4), 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/52.4.670

  7. Carayannis, E. G., Samara, E. T., & Bakouros, Y. L. (2015). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  8. Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019

  9. Drejer, A. (1997). The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology. Technovation, 17(5), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(96)00107-1

  10. Eurostat. (2021a). Employed HRST by category, age and occupation. Retrieved April 23, 2021, from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=hrst_st_nocc&lang=en

  11. Eurostat. (2021b). Employment in technology and knowledge-intensive sectors by NUTS 2 regions and sex (from 2008 onwards, NACE Rev. 2). Retrieved April 23, 2021, from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=htec_emp_reg2&lang=en

  12. Eurostat. (2021c). Human resources in science and technology (HRST). Retrieved April 23, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsc00025

  13. Forbes, N., & Wield, D. (2004). What is R&D? Why does it matter? Science and Public Policy, 31(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154304781779949

  14. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4

  15. Gackstatter, S., Kotzemir, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). Building an innovation-driven economy – the case of BRIC and GCC countries. Foresight, 16(4), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-09-2012-0063

  16. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1

  17. Gemici, Z., & Öztürk, F. (2020). Ar-Ge’yi Doğru Yorumlamak: Bütüncül Ar-Ge, İnovasyon ve Teknoloji Yönetimi. Makina Tasarım ve İmalat Dergisi, 18(2), 82–91.

  18. Germany Trade&Invest. (2021).

  19. Godin, Benoit. (2003). The Most Cherished Indicator: Gorss Domestic Expenditures on R&D (GERD)(No. 22).

  20. Godin, Benoı̂t. (2003). The emergence of S&T indicators: why did governments supplement statistics with indicators? Research Policy, 32(4), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00032-X

  21. Greenhalg, C., & Rogers, M. (2010). Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  22. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35(2–3), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A

  23. Haneda, S., & Ito, K. (2018). Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? Research Policy, 47(1), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.008

  24. Keely, B. (2007). Human Capital: How what you know shapes your life. OECD Publishing.

  25. OECD. (1995). Canberra Manual: Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065581-en

  26. OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en

  27. OECD. (2020a). Education and Training. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from https://stats.oecd.org/

  28. OECD. (2020b). Educational attainment and labour-force status. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from https://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?datasetcode=EAG_NEAC&lang=en#

  29. OECD. (2021). Main Science and Technology Indicators. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from https://stats.oecd.org/

  30. Oslo Manual. (2018). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  31. Patanakul, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2014). Examining the roles of government policy on innovation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2014.07.003

  32. Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2019). Exploring science-and-technology-led innovation: a cross-country study. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0097-0

  33. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy,98(5). https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

  34. Serajuddin, U., & Hamedah, N. (2021). New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2020-2021. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2020-2021

  35. Shane, S. (Ed.). (2009). The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management. Wiley-Blackwell.

  36. Suseno, Y., Standing, C., Kiani-Mavi, R., & Jackson, P. (2020). National innovation performance: the role of human capital and social capital. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1536536

  37. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books.

  38. TPE. (2021). Türkiye Patent İstatistikleri. Retrieved July 26, 2020, from http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/TURKPATENT/statistics/

  39. TÜBİTAK. (2004). Ulusal Bilim ve Teknoloji Politikaları, 2003-2023 Strateji Belgesi. Retrieved from https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/vizyon2023/Vizyon2023_Strateji_Belgesi.pdf

  40. TÜBİTAK. (2010). Science and Technology Human Resources Strategy and Action Plan 2011-2016.

  41. TÜİK. (2021). TÜİK, Temel İstatistikler, Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla ve Kişi Başına Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2218

  42. Wang, J. (2018). Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong. Research Policy, 47(2), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.008

  43. Worldbank. (2020). How does the World Bank classify countries? Retrieved July 23, 2020, from Worldbank website: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/378834-how-does-the-world-bank-classify-countries

  44. Worldbank. (2021a). Patent applications, residents. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=IP.PAT.RESD

  45. Worldbank. (2021b). Scientific and technical journal articles. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=IP.JRN.ARTC.SC

  46. Yilmaz, G. (2014). Turkish Middle Income Trap and Less Skilled Human Capital.