Journal of Economics and Business
ISSN 2615-3726 (Online)
ISSN 2621-5667 (Print)
Published: 16 November 2020
Applying Simplifying Heuristics when Making Judgment under Uncertainty – A Field Study
Fresenius University, Germany
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: Decision Making, Heuristics, Uncertainty Behavioral Economics, Field Experiment
This paper studies the so-called Take the Best (TTB) and the other two related heuristics which are Take the last (TTL) and the Minimalist heuristics to collect more evidence on these heuristics and then make comparison on performance of these heuristics’ potential users who have different degree of knowledge. People actually adhere to the recognition heuristics (RH) so often when facing inferential choice between a recognized object and a novel one. It is a main purpose of our empirical field study to look for evidence on what decision makers really do to arrive at their final choice in cases where both objects in the choice task are recognized. Will they still stick to recognition cue, or will they follow TTB or TTL or the Minimalist heuristic or will they resort to other type of strategies? Our results are somehow ambiguous. In sum, the cues the participants really picked up from their minds when taking the task and revealed by themselves in the interviews are more diverse and complicated than the anticipated ones.
Callebaut, W. (2007). Herbert Simon’s silent revolution. Biological Theory, Vol. 2(1), pp. 76-86.
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D.G. (1996). Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality. Psychological Review, 62(1), pp. 650-669.
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D.G. (1999b). Betting on one good reason: The Take The Best Heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer & P.M. Todd & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart, pp.75-95. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D.G. (1999a). The Recognition Heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer & P.M. Todd & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart, pp.37-58. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. and Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 451-482.
Gintis, H. (2006). The foundations of behavior: the beliefs, preferences, and constraints mode. Biological Theory, Vol. 1(2), pp. 123-127.
Kahneman, D. (2003).A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality, American Psychologist, Vol. 58(9), pp. 697-720.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Kalantari, B. (2010). Herbert A. Simon on making decisions: enduring insights and bounded rationality. Journal of Management History, Vol. 16 (4), pp. 509-520.
Kerr, G. (2007). The development history and philosophical sources of Herbert Simon’s Administrative Behavior. Journal of Management History, Vol. 13 (3), pp. 255-268.
Kerr, G. (2011). What Simon said: the impact of the major management works of Herbert Simon. Journal of Management History, Vol. 17(4), pp. 399-419.
Simon, H.A. (1947). Administrative Behavior, 1st ed., Free Press, New York.
Simon, H.A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69 (1), pp. 99-118.
Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, Vol. 63(2), pp. 129-138
Simon, H.A. (1978). On how to decide what to do. Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 9 (2), pp. 494-507.
Simon, H.A. (1980). The behavioral and social science. Science, Vol. 209, pp. 72-78.