Banking Relationship Ties to Firm Performance: Evidence from Food and Beverage Firms in Vietnam

Journal of Economics and Business

ISSN 2615-3726 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5667 (Print)

Published: 30 April 2020

Banking Relationship Ties to Firm Performance: Evidence from Food and Beverage Firms in Vietnam

Le Thanh Tam, Nguyen Phuong Ngan, Nguyen Trong Trung, Cao Phuong Minh

National Economics University, Vietnam

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1992.03.02.224

Pages: 602-616

Keywords: Bank Relationship, Firms’ Performance, Foreign Ownership, Leverage, Vietnamese Food and Beverage Listed Firms

Abstract

This paper is aimed at analyzing the effects of banking relationship on performance of Vietnamese firms in Food and Beverage (F&B), one of the highest potential sectors. Panel data of 170 observations covers 34 F&B firms listed in the Vietnam stock exchanges in the period 2014-2018. The fixed effect model (FEM) is applied. The key findings are: First, short-term loan financing, leverage, and fixed asset ratios all negatively impacted on F&B firm performance, while firm size and net profit margin had positive impacts. These findings were consistent with previous studies. Second, the opposite results with previous studies were: (i) negative corelation of ROE and number of banks firms working with, as F&B firms were inefficient in selecting bank partners; (ii) positive relation of short-term liabilities ratio and ROA/ROE, as F&B firms utilize other non-bank liabilities shortly; (iii) foreign ownership had negative relationship with ROA& ROE. Foreign investors did not have significant roles in most F&B firms. Third, long-term borrowing from banks, state ownership and ages all insignificantly correlated with firm performance. Recommendations to F&B firms include: (1) Reduce the short-term loans and fixed assets investment, while increase the cheap equity funding sources via shareholders (2) Be selective in working with banks to have better fees and interest saved with banks. (3) Utilize other short-term liabilities, including payables and advances – the low-cost funding sources. F&B firms have good bargaining powers in requesting advances from their clients. (4) Have smart buy-in strategies on foreign ownership.

References

  1. Agarwal, R. & Elston, J. A. (2001). Bank–firm relationships, financing and firm performance in Germany. Economics Letters, 72(2), 225-232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00427-X

  2. Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1327. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00567

  3. Arikawa, Y., & Miyajima, H. (2005). Relationship banking and debt choice: evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance, 13(3), 408-418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00435.x

  4. Aristei, D. & Gallo, M. (2016). The determinants of firm–bank relationships in Italy: bank ownership type,diversification and multiple banking relationships. The European Journal of Finance, 23(15), 1512-1543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2016.1186712

  5. Aristei, D., Gallo, M., & Angori, G. . (2018). Banking relationships, firm-size heterogeneity and access to credit: evidence from European firms. Finance Research Letters. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.07.004

  6. Baum, C. F., Schafer, D., & Talavera, O. (2007). The effects of short-term liabilities on profitability: a comparison of German and US firms. Retrieved from https://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/wp636.pdf

  7. Belaid, F., Boussaada, R., Belguith, H. (2017). Bank-firm relationship and credit risk: an analysis on Tunisian firms. Research In International Business And Finance, 42, 532-543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.011

  8. Ben, S. H. (2017). Influence of debt maturity on firm performance: an international comparison. International Journal of Economics And Finance, 9(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v9n5p106

  9. Best, R. & Zhang, H. (1993). Alternative information sources and the information content of bank loans. The Journal of Finance, 48(4), 1507-1522. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2329049

  10. Bonfirm, D., Dai, Q., & Franco, F. (2018). The number of bank relationships and borrowing costs: the role of information asymmetries. Journal of Empirical Finance, 46, 191-209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.12.005

  11. Boot, A. W. (2000). Relationship banking: what do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 7-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.2000.0282

  12. Burger, A., Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, C. & Rojec, M. (2017). Determinants of firm performance and growth during economic recession: the case of central and eastern European countries. Economic Systems, 41(4), 569-590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.05.003

  13. Campbell, T.S. (1979). Optimal investment financing decisions and the value of confidentiality. The Journal of Financial And Quantitative Analysis, 14(5), 913-924. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2330297

  14. Castelli, A., Gerald, P. D. Jr., & Hasan, I. (2006). Bank relationships and small firms’ financial performance. Working Paper. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from https://www.academia.edu/22255244/Bank_Relationships_and_Small_Firms_Financial_Performance?auto=download

  15. Chen, Z., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2016). The bank–firm relationship: helping or grabbing. International Review of Economics & Finance, 42, 385-403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.10.010

  16. Costea, V. & Brasoveanu, L. O. (n.d.). Determinants of corporate financial performance. Retrieved from http://www.dafi.ase.ro/revista/6/costea%20valentin.pdf

  17. Dhawan, R. (2001). Firm size and productivity differential: theory and evidence from a panel of US firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44(3), 269-293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00139-6

  18. Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economics Study, 51(3), 393-414. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430

  19. Diamond, D. W. (1991). Monitoring and reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 689-721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/261775

  20. Du, J., & Li, D. D. (2007). The soft budget constraint of banks. Journal of Coparative Economics, 35(1), 108-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.11.001

  21. Duffin, E. (2020). Impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the global economy - Statistics & Facts, Statistica Report, April 3, 2020.

  22. Ericson, R. & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: a framework for empirical work. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(1), 53-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2297841

  23. Garriga, M. J. (2006). The effect of relationship lending on firm performance. Retrieved from https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/estudis/2006/hdl_2072_2233/UABDT06-5.pdf

  24. Geroski. P. A., Mata, J. & Portugal, P. (2007). Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategy Management Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.823

  25. GoV (Government of Vietnam) (2019), Decree No. 100/2020/ND-CP dated December 30, 2019 on administrative penalties for road traffic offences and rail transport offences.

  26. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2014). Report on socio-economy situation 2014. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=14195

  27. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2015). Report on socio-economy situation 2015. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=15515

  28. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2016). Report on socio-economy situation 2016. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=16194

  29. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2017). Report on socio-economy situation 2017. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=18670

  30. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2018). Report on socio-economy situation 2018. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=19043

  31. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2019). Report on socio-economy situation 2019. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=19463

  32. GSO - General Statistical Office of Vietnam (2020). Report on socio-economy situation in the first quarter of 2020. Hanoi. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=622&ItemID=19568

  33. Hakimi, A. (2017). On the nonlinear relationship between bank financing and firm performance: a PSTR model for Tunisian companies. International Journal of Accounting And Financial Reporting, 7(2), 2162-3082. doi:https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v7i2.12348

  34. Haseed, W. B. & Muhammad, A. K. (2013). The impact of capital structure on firm’s performance ( a case of non-financial sector of Pakistan). European Journal of Business And Management, 5(31). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.735.5527&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  35. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., Scharfstein, D. (1990). The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 67-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90021-Q

  36. Höwer, D. (2016). The role of bank relationships when firms are financially distressed. Journal of Banking & Finance, 65, 59-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.01.002

  37. Huang, R. D, & Shiu, C. Y. (2009). Local effects of foreign ownership in an emerging financial market: evidence from qualified foreign institutional investors in Taiwan. Financial Management, 38(3), 567-602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01048.x

  38. Ilyukhin, E. (2015). The impact of financial leverage on firm performance: evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 9(2), 24-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.9.2.2015.24-36

  39. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

  40. Kantar (2019), Kantar World Panel Vietnam Insight Handbook 2019, Market report.

  41. Le Ha (2020), “New Regulations on Drunk Driving Affect the Beer Industry”, Vietnamnet Newspaper, Uploaded on Jan 17, 2020.

  42. Le, P. D., & Nguyen, T. N. T. (2012). Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến nợ tín dụng ngân hàng dài hạn của các doanh nghiệp ngành sản xuất chế biến thực phẩm niêm yết trên thị trường chứng khoán VN. Tạp chí phát triển kinh tế, 266, 22-29. Retrieved from http://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=ed3742bc-04c9-47f7-bf61-d1478321fd40

  43. Li, L., Markowski, C., Xu, L., & Markowski, E. (2008). TQM—a predecessor of ERP implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 569-580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.004

  44. Li, Y., Nie, W., Xiang, E., Djajadikerta, H. G. (2018). Can banks identify firms’ real earnings management? evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 25, 23-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.10.005

  45. Lien Nguyen (2018), Vietnam – 2018 food and beverage, Report of Business Center for British Business Group Vietnam.

  46. Limpaphayom, P. & Polwitoon, S. (2004). Bank relationship and firm performance: evidence from Thailand before the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(9-10), 1577-1600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2004.00585.x

  47. Loderer, C. F., & Waelchli, U. (2009). Firm age and performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1342248

  48. Massa, M., & Dass, N. (2006). The dark side of bank-firm relationships: the (market) liquidity impact of bank lending. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891046

  49. McKinsey (2020). COVID-19: Implication for Business. Executive Briefing, April 2020.

  50. Mohammed, M. & Andrew, A. (2019). The nexus between asset tangibility and firms' financial performance: a panel study of non-financial firms listed on the Ghana stock exchange (GSE). European Academic Research. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333045889_The_Nexus_between_Asset_Tangibility_and_Firms'_Financial_Performance_A_Panel_Study_of_Non-Financial_Firms_Listed_on_the_Ghana_Stock_Exchange_GSE

  51. Nguyen Thu Hang, Khuu Thanh Quy, Nguyen Ngoc Dieu Le (2018). Determinants of Firm Growth: Evidence from Vietnamese Small and Medium Sized Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of Economics and Development, Vol.20, No.3, December 2018, pp. 71-87 ISSN 1859 0020 | DOI: 10.33301/JED-P-2018-20-03-05.

  52. Nguyen, D. T. (2009). Phân tích hiệu quả sử dụng vốn tại công ty cổ phẩn chế biến thực phẩm kinh đô miền bắc. Hà Nội: Đại Học Kinh Tế - Đại Học Quốc Gia Hà Nội. Retrieved from https://123doc.net/document/4002023-phan-tich-hieu-qua-su-dung-von-tai-cong-ty-co-phan-che-bien-thuc-pham-kinh-do-mien-bac.htm

  53. Nguyen, L. T. (2013). Nghiên cứu các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến hiệu quả hoạt động kinh doanh của các công ty ngành sản xuất chế biến thực phẩm niêm yết trên thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam. Đại Học Đà Nẵng. Retrieved from http://tailieuso.udn.vn/bitstream/TTHL_125/5284/2/Tomtat.pdf

  54. Nguyen, Q. N., & Mai, V. N. (2011). Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến hiệu quả hoạt động kinh doanh của doanh nghiệp nhỏ và vừa ở thành phố Cần Thơ. Tạp Chí Khoa Học, 19b, 122-129. Retrieved from http://sj.ctu.edu.vn/ql/docgia/download/baibao-5576/trongtruong_so19b_15.pdf

  55. Nguyen, T. P. (2017). Nghiên cứu các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến hiệu quả kinh doanh của các doanh nghiệp ngành thực phẩm và đồ uống niêm yết trên sàn chứng khoán Việt Nam. Đà Nẵng: Đại Học Kinh Tế Đà Nẵng. Retrieved from https://xemtailieu.com/tai-lieu/nghien-cuu-cac-nhan-to-anh-huong-den-hieu-qua-kinh-doanh-cua-cac-doanh-nghiep-nganh-thuc-pham-va-do-uong-niem-yet-tren-san-chung-khoan-viet-nam-1856767.html

  56. Nguyen, T. T., Do, T. T., & Trinh, A. T. (2019). Ownership structure and firm growth: evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Business Marketing Management, 4, 1-11. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/www.ijbmm.com/docs/2134292685

  57. Nguyen, V. T, & Pham, T. Q. (2017). Ảnh hưởng của sở hữu cổ đông lên lợi nhuận cổ phiếu của các doanh nghiệp niêm yết Việt Nam. Kinh Tế Và Phát Triển, 242. Retrieved from https://tailieumienphi.vn/docs/d/1162917/anh-huong-cua-so-huu-co-dong-len-loi-nhuan-co-phieu-cua-cac-doanh-nghiep-niem-yet-viet-nam

  58. Nielson (2020), Vietnamese fast moving consumer good industry 2018-2020, Market report.

  59. Ongena, S., & Degryse, H. (2001). Bank relationships and firm profitability. Financial Management, 30(1), 9-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3666389

  60. Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2001). The duration of bank relationship. (Elsevier, Ed.) Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 449-475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00069-1

  61. Pham, H. T. (2011). Phân tích hiệu qủa hoạt động của công ty cổ phần nông sản thực phẩm Quảng Ngãi.Đà Nẵng: Đại Học Đà Nẵng. Retrieved from http://luanvan.net.vn/luan-van/luan-van-tom-tat-phan-tich-hieu-qua-hoat-dong-cua-cong-ty-co-phan-nong-san-thuc-pham-quang-ngai-61564/

  62. Phung, D. N., & Mishra, A. V. (2015). Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Australian Economic Papers, 55, 63-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12056

  63. Prowse, S. D. (1990). Institutional investment patterns and corporate financial behavior in the United States and Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 43-66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90020-Z

  64. Rajan, R. (1992). Insiders and outsiders: the choice between informed and arm's-length debt. Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1367-1400. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2328944

  65. Rajan, R., & Petersen, M. A. (n.d.). The benefits of lending relationships: evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2329133

  66. Reijonen, H., & Komppula, R. (2007). Perception of success and its effect on small firm performance. Journal of Small Business And Enterprise Development, 14(04), 689-701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710832776

  67. SBV – State Bank of Vietnam (2020). Statistical Data of Credit Institutions to December 31, 2019. official website of SBV https://www.sbv.gov.vn/webcenter/portal/vi/menu/trangchu/tk/hdchtctctd/tkmsctcb?_afrLoop=3220292201975539#%40%3F_afrLoop%3D3220292201975539%26centerWidth%3D80%2525%26leftWidth%3D20%2525%26rightWidth%3D0%2525%26showFooter%3Dfalse%26showHeader%3Dfalse%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dlnlnz7wde_147

  68. Schiantarelli, F., & Jaramillo, F. (2002). Access to long term debt and effects of firm's performance : lessons from Ecuador. IDB Working Paper, 168. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1814

  69. Statista (2019). Food and personal care ecommerce report 2019. Vietnam.

  70. Strahan, P. E. & Weston, J. P. (1998). Small business lending and the changing structure of the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6-8), 821-845. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00010-7

  71. Sultan, J., Qing, Y. & Abid, A. (2016). Multiple bank relationship and their impact on firm’s performance: evidence from Pakistan. Journal On Innovation And Sustainability, 57-64. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6b28/85ab75cac19f29e0b87c53b8cb2e08de677e.pdf

  72. Suwanaporn, C. (2003). Determinants of bank lending in Thailand: an empirical examination for the years 1992 to 1996. Retrieved from https://www.peterlang.com/view/title/44096

  73. Thadden, E. L. (1995). Long-term contracts, short-term investment and monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 62(4), 557-575. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2298077

  74. Thi Thuc Anh Phan (2019). Does organizational innovation always lead to better performance? A study of firms in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 21 No. 1, 2019 pp. 71-82. Emerald Publishing Limited e-ISSN: 2632-5330 p-ISSN: 1859-0020 DOI 10.1108/JED-06-2019-0003

  75. Trading Economics (2020), Vietnam Annual Growth Rate 2000-2020 Data, official website https://tradingeconomics.com/vietnam/gdp-growth-annual

  76. Tran, N. M., Walterm N., & Ann, J. (2014). Government ownership and firm performance: the case of Vietnam. International Journal of Economics And Financial Issues, 4(3), 628-650. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b37b/d5386f3ca3759cf7488603b5b7b731d15ea4.pdf

  77. Udell, G. F., & Berger, A. N. (1998). The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking And Finance, 22(6), 613-673. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.137991

  78. Vietnam Report (2020). Annual report white paper: Vietnam’s economy 2020: Vietnamese big enterprises and growth challenges 2020. Hanoi.

  79. VIR (2018). Local F&B firms expand to counter foreign competitors. Vietnam Investment Review Newspaper, Uploaded on May 29, 2018. https://www.vir.com.vn/local-fb-firms-expand-to-counter-foreign-competition-59614.html

  80. Vo, T. Q., & Le, T. M. N. (2017). Effects of working capital management on firm value - a studies of the fisheries industry in Vietnam. Journal of Science Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 7(3), 42-52. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiDl9q-2MvoAhVGyYsBHWlIBm8QFjABegQIARAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftckh.ou.edu.vn%2Fen%2Fdownloadfile%3Fidbaiviet%3D690&usg=AOvVaw3cp09SU2UAjciPn0Ef4Jit

  81. Vu, H. T. & Nguyen, M. H. (2013). The effect of banking relationship on firm performance in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(5), 148. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n5p148

  82. Vuong, Q.H. (2019). “The financial economy of Viet Nam in an age of reform, 1986-2016”. In U. Volz, P. Morgan and N. Yoshino (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Banking and Finance in Asia (pp. 201-222). New York, NY: Routledge.

  83. Walker, E. A. & Brown, A. (2004). What success factors are important to small business owners? International Small Business Journal, 22(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604047411

  84. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2006). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall Inc. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=928677

  85. Wei, Z., Xie, F. & Zhang, S. (2005). Ownership structure and firm value in China's privatized firms: 1991-2001. Journal of Financial And Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 87-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000001757

  86. Weinstein, D. E., & Yafeh, Y. (1998). On the costs of a bank-centered financial system: evidence from the changing main bank relations in Japan. The Journal of Finance, 53(2), 635-672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.254893

  87. Yao, J., & Ouyang, H. (2007). Dark-side evidence on bank–firm relationship in Japan. Japan And The World Economy, 19(2), 198-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2005.10.001

  88. Yasuda, A. (2005). Do bank relationships affect the firm's underwriter choice in the corporate‐bond underwriting market? The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1259-1292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00761.x

  89. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

  90. Yildirim, A. (2019). The effect of relationship banking on firm efficiency and default risk. Journal of Corporate Finance. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101500.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved