Journal of Economics and Business

ISSN 2615-3726 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5667 (Print)

Published: 02 September 2019

How has the Chinese Yuan Evolved since the 2005 Reform?

James J. Kung, Wen-Ying Lin

Ming Chuan University, University of Taipei, Taiwan

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1992.02.03.132

Pages: 855-862

Keywords: Yuan, Bootstrap, Random Walk, Moving Average, Trading Range Break

Abstract

This study employs the bootstrap method to explore the evolution of the Chinese yuan. We use the following three random walks to characterize the evolution of the yuan: an IID-parameterized random walk, an ARCH(3)-parameterized random walk, and a GARCH(1,1)-parameterized random walk. To proceed, we use the bootstrap method to generate 10,000 artificial yuan series from each random walk and compute the return from the trading rule (i.e., moving average or trading range break) for each of the 10,000 artificial yuan series. Then, we construct a 95% percentile interval with these 10,000 returns to determine if the interval contains the return computed from the actual yuan series. Using daily exchange rate data from 22 July 2005 to 19 July 2019, our results show that, of the three random walks, the GARCH(1,1) random walk best portrays the yuan since the 2005 exchange rate system reform.

References

  1. Baillie, R. T. and Bollerslev, T. (1989) The message in daily exchange rates: A conditional-variance tale, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 7, 297-305.

  2. Diebold, F. X. and Nerlove, M. (1989) The dynamics of exchange rate volatility: A multivariate latent factor ARCH model, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4, 1-21.

  3. Edwards, R. D., Magee, J. and Bassetti, W.H.C. (2007) Technical Analysis of Stock Trends, 9th edition, AMACOM, New York.

  4. Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife, Annals of Statistics, 7, 1, 1-26.

  5. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall, New York.

  6. Funke, M. and Rahn, J. (2005) Just how undervalued is the Chinese Renminbi? World Economy, 28(4), 465-489.

  7. Goh, M. H. and Kim, Y. (2006) Is the Chinese Renminbi undervalued? Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(1), 116-126.

  8. Hsieh, D. A. (1988) The statistical properties of daily foreign exchange rates: 1974-1983, Journal of International Economics, 24, 129-145.

  9. Meese, R. A. and Rogoff, K. (1983) Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: Do they fit out of sample? Journal of International Economics, 14, 3-24.

  10. Milhoj, A. (1987) A conditional variance model for daily deviations of an exchange rate, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 5, 99-103.

  11. Murphy, J. J. (1999) Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets, New York Institute of Finance, New York.

  12. Mussa, M. (1979) Empirical regularities in the behavior of exchange rates and theories of the foreign exchange market, in K. Brunner and A. H. Meltzer, eds., Carnegie-Rochester series on public policy, 11, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

  13. Ogawa, E. and Sakane, M. (2006) Chinese yuan after Chinese exchange rate system reform, China & World Economy, 14(6), 39-57.

  14. Siegel, J .J. (2002) Stocks for the Long Run, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved