Journal of Economics and Business

ISSN 2615-3726 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5667 (Print)

Published: 19 November 2019

The Effects of Central transfers on Local Own-Revenue: The Case of Morocco

Meriem MIRI

Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1992.02.04.166

Pages: 1263- 1274

Keywords : Fiscal Decentralization, Central Transfers, Local Own-Revenue, Morocco

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the effects of transferred central revenues on local own revenues. The nature of these effects remains ambiguous according to theoretical and empirical literature review, especially for developing countries. Indeed, these effects are analyzed in the context of a behavior’s imbalance that can be caused by decentralization between local expenditures and their coverage by local own revenues. We are interested in Morocco for the period 2002-2014, taking into consideration all the Moroccan territorial communities grouped by the 16 regions. The effects are analyzed for total own revenue and then for each type of own-revenues and taking into account the endogeneity effect of transfers as a key issue. It is concluded that an increase in transferred central revenues does not necessarily encourage local own revenues in Morocco. This unfavorable effect is more important for the poorest regions than for non-poorest ones.

References

  1. Besley, T., Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition.  American Economic Review, 85(1), 25-45.
  2. Boex, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2005). The determinants of the incidence of intergovernmental grants: A survey of the international experience.
  3. Brueckner, J. K. (1998). Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls.  Journal of urban economics, 44(3), 438-467.
  4. Buettner, T., Wildasin, D. E. (2006). The dynamics of municipal fiscal adjustment.  Journal of Public Economics, 90(6), 1115-1132.
  5. Caldeira, E., Foucault, M.,  Rota-Graziosi, G. (2012). Does decentralization facilitate access to poverty-related services? Evidence from Benin (No. w18118). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  6. Caldeira, E., Rota-Graziosi, G. (2014). The crowding-in effect of simple unconditional central grants on local own-source revenue: The case of Benin.  Journal of African Economies, 23(3), 361-387.
  7. Caldeira, E., Foucault, M.,  Rota-Graziosi, G. (2012). Decentralization in Africa and the nature of local governments ‘competition: Evidence from Benin.  NBER Working papers 18126, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  8. Caldeira, E., Rota-Graziosi, G. (2014). La décentralisation dans les pays en développement : une revue de la littérature. Revue d’économie du développement, 2014/4 Vol. 22, p5-37. DOI : 10.3917/edd.284.0005.
  9. Filmer, D., Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115-132.
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  11. Hines, J. R., Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: The flypaper effect. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217-226.
  12. Mogues, T., Benin, S. (2012). Do external grants to district governments discourage own revenue generation? A look at local public finance dynamics in Ghana. World Development, 40(5), 1054-1067.
  13. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  14. Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward A second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373.
  15. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  16. Panda, P. K. (2009). Central fiscal transfers and states’ own-revenue efforts in India: panel data models.  Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 3(3), 223-242.
  17. Rajaraman, I., Vasishtha, G. (2000). Impact of grants on tax effort of local government. Economic and Political Weekly, 2943-2948.
  18. Salmon, P. (1987). The logic of pressure groups and the structure of the public sector. European Journal of Political Economy, 3(1-2), 55-86.
  19. Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European economic review, 40(1), 61-89.
  20. Shah, A. (1991).  The new fiscal federalism in Brazil.  (Vol. 124). World Bank Publications.
  21. Skidmore, M. (1999). Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments. Public Choice, 99(1), 77-102.
  22. Tiebout, C. M. (1956).Apure theory of local expenditures.  Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416.
  23. Zhuravskaya, E. V. (2000). Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal federalism, Russian style. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 337-368.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved