Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Health and Medical Sciences

ISSN 2622-7258

Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.09 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.57 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.52 AM.png
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 April 2020

Management of Septic Shock According to SSC 2016 in Post Laparotomy Exploration due to Gastric Perforation

Yovita Koswara, Reza Widianto Sudjud

Padjajaran University, Sadikin General Hospital, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1994.03.02.112

Pages: 177-183

Keywords: Sepsis, Shock, Septic, Intraabdominal, Infection

Abstract

According to International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016, sepsis was defined as life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems and the incidence increased by year. Septic Shock was defined as subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory and cellular metabolism abnormalities are profound enough to substantially increase mortality and can be identified with persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP>65mmHg and having serum lactate level > 2 mmo/L despite adequate volume resuscitation. Intraabdominal infection was reported as contributor to a high mortality rate for infection case in intensive care units. We reported a case of a patient with sepsis and septic shock caused by intraabdominal infection post laparotomy exploration ec gastric perforation. The patient was monitored prospectively, received antibiotics, hemodynamic support and mechanical ventilation support while being treated in the ICU. On the sixth day, the patient was transferred to ward.

References

  1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, et al. (2016). Surviving Sepsis Campaign. International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. Critical Care Medicine, 43(4), 304-77

  2. Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Labricciosa FM, et al. (2017 ). The Management of intra abdominal infections from a global perspective .WSES guidelines for management of intraabdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery,12-29

  3. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A.( 2018). The surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle 2018 Update. Intensive Care Med, 44(6), 925-8

  4. Singer M, Deutschman CS, et al. (2016). The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801-10

  5. Seymour M, Liu VX, et al. (2016). Assesment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA , 315(8),762-74

  6. Leone M, Constantin J, Montravers T, Misset B. (2018). Guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections, 34, 117–30

  7. Solomkin JS, Mazasuki JE, Bradley JS, et al.(2010). Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection in Adults and Children. Guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 50,133-64

  8. Tatsumi H. (2019).  Enteral Tolerance in critically ill patients. Journal of Intensive Care,7:30

  9. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa S, Dhainaut JP, Rodriguez AL, et al. (2001). Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein c for severe sepsis. N Eng J Med, 344 (10), 699-709