Choice of Studies at University, Personality and Socio-Economic Status: Comparison Between French Students in a Public Social Sciences and Humanities Faculty and Brazilian Law Students in a Private Faculty

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

Published: 18 March 2019

Choice of Studies at University, Personality and Socio-Economic Status: Comparison Between French Students in a Public Social Sciences and Humanities Faculty and Brazilian Law Students in a Private Faculty

Sandrine Gaymard, Wilson Engelmann, Teodor Tiplica

University of Angers (France), University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Brazil)

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1991.02.01.61

Abstract

Several studies have examined the links between personality and choice of studies, particularly from a longitudinal point of view. This original research proposes to study these aspects a posteriori. The Rotter questionnaire (1966) was completed by two groups of students in psychology (N=65) and law (N= 91). The other particularity of the samples concerns the location and the differences in socio-economic backgrounds: privileged for law students in Brazil, modest for students in psychology in France. Most of the hypotheses put forward, particularly those related to the citizenship and political aspects, are verified on the basis of the binomial test.

References

  1. Almlund, M., Duckworth, A.L., Heckman, J.J., & Kautz T. (2011). Personality Psychology and Economics. In E.A Hanushek, S. Machin  & L.Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 4, (pp.1-181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  2. Baron, J. D., & Cobb-Clark, D. (2010). Are Young People’s Educational Outcomes Linked to their Sense of Control? IZA Working Paper no. 4907.

  3. Buriel, R., & Rivera, L. (1980). The relationship of locus of control to family income and familism among Anglo-and Mexican-American high school students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 111(1), 27-34.

  4. Berglund, E., Lytsy, P.,  &  Westerling, R. (2014). The influence of locus of control on self-rated health in context of chronic disease: a structural equation modeling approach in a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, 492  http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/492

  5. Chak, K., & Leung, L. (2004). Shyness and locus of control as predictors of internet addiction and internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(5), 559-570.

  6. Claes, M. (1981). L'évolution de l'attribution des causes des succès et des échecs au cours de la scolarité. Revue de  psychologie appliquée, 3(4), 275-294

  7. Clopper, C. J., & Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26, 404–413.

  8. Engelmann, W., Gaymard, S., & Von Hohendorff, R. (2018). The Legal Perception of the Risks of Nanotechnologies in the Environment: Challenges and Possibilities in the Construction of a Framework. Veredas Do Direito: Direito Ambiental E Desenvolvimento SustentáVel, 15(33), 243-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v15i33.1298

  9. Gaymard, S., & Tiplica, T. (accepted). Road conditionality and personality: An exploratory study among young male and female French drivers. Journal of Safety and Reliability.

  10. Gaymard, S.,& Tiplica, T. (2016a). Leisure, risk awareness and personality factors among female students. Journal of Public Health, 24(6), 521-534. doi: 10.1007/s10389-016-0752-5

  11. Gaymard, S., & Tiplica, T. (2016b). An exploratory study of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control among female students in a French context. British Journal of Education, Society and behavioural Science, 18(1), 1-12. doi: 10.9734/BJESBS/2016/28383

  12. Gaymard, S., & Tiplica, T. (2017). Conditionnalité routière, risque et personnalité. In S.Gaymard & T.Tiplica (Dir.), Sécurité routière : un défi à l’aube du XXIème siècle (pp.13-22). Paris : L’Harmattan.

  13. Goldberg, L.R., Sweeney, D. Merenda, P.F., & Hughes, J.E. (1998). Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status on self descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 393-403.

  14. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358-374.

  15. Howell, D. C. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

  16. Humburg, M.  (2017) Personality and field of study choice in university. Education Economics,  25(4), 366-378. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2017.1282426

  17. Jellison, J., M., & Green, J. (1981) A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: the norm of internality. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40, 643-649.

  18. Norman, P., Bennett, P., Smith, C., & Murphy, S. (1998). Health locus of control and health behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 3(2), 171-180.

  19. Observatoire national de la vie étudiante. (2014). La vie étudiante. Retrieved from http://www.ut-capitole.fr/vie-du-campus/etudes-sur-les-conditions-de-vie-des-etudiants/

  20. Rabinowitz, R.G. (1978).  Internal-external control expectancies in black children of differing socioeconomic status. Psychological Reports, 42(3), 1339-1345. doi : 10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3c.1339

  21. Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  22. Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph, 80(1), 1-28.

  23. Rotter,  J.B., Chance, J.E. & Phares, E.J. (1972). Applications of social learning theory of personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  24. Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (2001). Locus of control and health behaviour revisited: a multivariate analysis of young adults from 18 countries. British journal of Psychology, 92(4), 659-672.

  25. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J. & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291–298. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406923

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle