Civil Society: The Complexity of a Concept

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

Published: 27 April 2018

Civil Society: The Complexity of a Concept

Jorge Iván Gaviria Mesa, Mónica Lucía Granda Viveros

University of Antioquia (Colombia), University of Medellín (Colombia)

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1991.01.02.12

Abstract

The civil society is not reduced to a state structure, but it does not constitute its antimony. It is the scenario in which private interests interact in a complex relationship with the public apparatus, in an always deliberative way, with fluid democratic expressions and solid bases of participation in collective affairs. Democracy is only possible in society and society is only viable when the interaction of the various agents that compose it. State and society, under the parameters of pluralism, are the condition of the development of civil expressions. Therefore, democracy and freedom determine the existence of a political system in which civil society is not reduced to the periodical and mechanical electoral event in which political preferences are manifested, nor to the individualistic apathy of the neoliberal world. The example of this reduction to simply procedural practices is given by countries like Colombia, Mexico, Peru, among others in Latin America. And in the developed world, the United States is a paradigm of show democracy in front of a civil society superficial and far from the real daily problems. Article result of the research project "Latin American Social Thought" executed within the framework of doctoral studies in Political Science of the Universidad del Rosario, Argentina, whose purpose is to determine the validity of the concept of civil society

References

Arendt, H. (1998). La crisis de la República. Madrid, España: Tauris.

Bodino, J. Los seis libros de la República. Madrid, España: Tecnos.

Cohen, J. y Arato A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Habermas, J. (1993). Tres Modelos Normativos de Democracia. Barcelona, España: Paidós.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1999). Principios de la filosofía del derecho. Barcelona, España: Edhasa.

Hobbes, T. (2003). Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. New York, Estados Unidos: Yale University Press.

Hobbes, T. (1952). El Leviathan. Estados Unidos: University of Chicago.

Leschner, R. (1995). Las incertidumbres de la democracia. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Foro Nacional por Colombia.

Montesquieu, C. (1987). El Espíritu de las leyes. México: Porrúa.

Popper, K. (1947). The open society and its enemies. Londres: Routledge & sons, Ltda.

Taylor, C. (1995). Argumentos Filosóficos. Barcelona, España: Paidós.

Walzer, M. (2010). Pensar Políticamente. Barcelona, España: Paidós.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle