Determinants of Efficiency of Food and Beverage Companies: The Case of Vietnam in the Period of 2009 – 2018

Journal of Social and Political


ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

Published: 10 June 2019

Determinants of Efficiency of Food and Beverage Companies: The Case of Vietnam in the Period of 2009 – 2018

Do Hoai Linh, Vu Tuan Minh

National Economics University, Vietnam

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf


Pages: 397-412

Keywords: Efficiency, Food and Beverage Companies, Debt-to-Total Asset, Tangible Fixed Asset, Inventory Turnover, Return on Asset, Vietnam


Based on data from 36 listed Vietnamese food and beverage companies in the period of 2009-2018, the authors aim at studying determinants of the efficiency of Vietnamese food and beverage industry. By using regression results and Hausman testing result, the authors found that debt-to-total asset ratio and tangible fixed asset ratio are negatively correlated to return on asset (ROA), while, inventory turnover has a positive impact. Accordingly, the growth rate and receivable turnover's have no impacts on ROA. From the empirical research findings, recommendations were proposed to improve the efficiency of firms in the food and beverage industry in transitional countries such as Vietnam.


  1. Rodrik, Dani. "Terlambat Memberikan Kompensasi." Kompas. April 28, 2017. ttps:// (accessed July 20, 2018).

  2. Chomsky, Noam. How The World Works. USA: Soft Skull Press, 2011.

  3. Rajan, Ramkishen S. "Economic Globalization and Asia: Trade, Finance, and Taxation." ASEAN Economic Bulletin (ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute) 18, no. 1 (April 2001): 1-11.

  4. Secretariat, The ASEAN. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2015.

  5. ASEAN. "ASEAN Trade Facilitation Framework." (accessed July 20, 2018).

  6. Mudassir, Rayful. RI - India Target Total Dagang dan Investasi Capai US$50 miliar. May 18, 2018. (accessed July 20, 2018).

  7. PTI. India, Singapore to explore new areas of cooperation during Modi visit. April 6, 2018. (accessed July 20, 2018).

  8. bkpm. Indonesia to became the ASEANS biggest digital economy country. July 17, 2018. (accessed July 20, 2018).

  9. Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.

  10. "Biometric polling in Harripur by-Election, 54% impression unverifies." Dunia News. August 24, 2015.

  11. "Biometric system technically unreliable, says ECP." Dunia News. October 27, 2015.

  12. Atta, A. "First time in Pakistan: ECP holds Election with biometric verification of voters." Pro Pakistani. August 17, 2015.

  13. B. Habib, J. Akhtar, and A. Asghar. "Analysis of Implementing E-Voting in the Electoral System of Pakistan." Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan 2 (2015): 245-256.

  14. Capron, H. L. Computer tools for an information age. 5. Welsley, 2001.

  15. B. Habib, and J. Akhtar. "Computational representative techniques of Software Engineering for Social Sciences." Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences 34, no. 1 (2014): 111-120.

  16. Neumen, W. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. 7. University of Wisconsin at Whitewater.

  17. Baig, S. "Electronic Voting using fingerprints matching with Gabor Filter." International Bhurban Conference on Applied Science and Technology, Islamabad. Bhurban, 2011.

  18. Index, Global Innovation. " Switzerland, Sweden, Netherlands, USA, UK Top Annual Ranking. ." 2017.

  19. Li-Hua, R. "China’s Embracing Innovation Leads to its Peaceful Rise ." China Policy Institute: Analysis, 2017.

  20. Ernst, D. "China’s Innovation Policy is a Wake-Up Call for America ." Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network., 2011.

  21. Someren, T. C. R. van, & Someren-Wang, S. van. "Innovative China: Innovation Race Between East and West." Springer Science & Business Media., 2014.

  22. Knight, W. "China's AI Awakening: The West should stop worrying about China's AI revolution. It should copy it." MIT Technology Review. , 2017.

  23. Yang, J. Y., & Li, J. "The development of entrepreneurship in China." Asia Pacific Journal of Management: APJM; Singapore, 25, no. 2 (2008): 335–359.

  24. Chen, J., Yin, X., & Mei, L. "Holistic Innovation: An Emerging Innovation Paradigm Based on Eastern Wisdom. ." Technology Economics, 1, no. 12 (2017): 10-29.

  25. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. "(1990). Absorptive CapacityA New Perspective on Learning and Innovation." Administrative Science Quarterly 35, no. 1 (1990): 128–152.

  26. Chen, J., Yin, X., & Mei, L. "Holistic Innovation: An Emerging Paradigm of Sustained Competitive Advantage." International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2018.

  27. Euchner, J. "Innovation Ecosystems: An Interview with Ron Adner. ." Research Technology Management, 57, no. 6 (2014): 10–14.

  28. Lu, L., & Etzkowitz, H. " Strategic challenges for creating knowledge-based innovation in China: Transforming triple helix university-government-industry relations." Journal of Technology Management in China; Bradford, 3, no. 1 (2008): 5–11.

  29. Sabir, R. I., & Sabir, R. M. "Managing technological innovation: China’s strategy and challenges." Journal of Technology Management in China 5, no. 3 (2010): 213–226.

  30. Dodani, S., & LaPorte, R. E. " Brain drain from developing countries: how can brain drain be converted into wisdom gain? Royal Society of Medicine (Great Britain)." Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 98, no. 11, (2005): 487–491.

  31. Fu, X., Woo, W. T., & Hou, J. "Technological innovation policy in China: the lessons, and the necessary changes ahead. ." Economic Change and Restructuring; Dordrecht 49, no. 2 (2016): 139–157.

  32. Li-Hua, R. "Competitiveness of Chinese Firms." West Meets East. Springer, 2014.

  33. Chesbrough, H. "Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. ." Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 2006: 1–12.

  34. Lichtenthaler, U. "Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions." Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, no. 1 (2011): 75–93.

  35. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. "The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search, and collaboration." Research Policy, 43, no. 5 (2014): 867–878.

  36. Banton, Caroline. Efficiency Definition. 2019. (accessed April 1, 2019).

  37. VPBank Securities Company. Vietnamese Food and Beverage Industry Report. Hanoi: VPBank Securities, 2014.

  38. IMAP, Inc. Food and beverage industry global report - 2010. Delaware: IMAP, 2010.

  39. FPT Securities Company. Vietnamese stock market after recession. 2015. (accessed 4 1, 2019).

  40. Velnampy., T., and J. Aloy Niresh. "The Relationship between Capital Structure & Profitability." Global Jornal Of Management And Business Research XII, no. 13 (2012): 11-19.

  41. Batchimeg, Bayaraa. "Financial Performance Determinants of Organizations: The Case of Mongolian Companies." Journal of Competitiveness IX, no. 3 (2017): 22-33.

  42. Tiberti, Marco, Gianluca Stefani, and Ginerva Lombardi. "Efficiency and Capital Structure in the Italian Cereal Sector." International Journal On Food System Dynamics, 2016: 442-447.

  43. Salim, Mahfuzah, and Raj Yadav. "Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Listed Companies." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 2012: 156-166.

  44. Brigham, Eugene F., and Phillip R. Daves. Intermediate Financial Management. 10th. Mason: Thompson South-Western, 2010.

  45. Gujarati, Damodar N., and Dawn C. Porter. Basic Econometrics. 5th. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.

  46. Tung, Hoang. "An Investigation on Impact Factors that Affect the Business Efficiency of Oil and Gas Enterprises in Vietnam." International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences VI, no. 3 (2017): 36-73.

  47. Gambera, Michele, Milton Ezrati, and Bolong Cao. "Understanding Business Cycles." In CFA Program Curriculum Level I, Vol.2, by CFA Institute, edited by Michele Gambera, Milton Ezrati and Bolong Cao, 284-367. Charlottesville: Wiley, 2018.

  48. Alchian, A.A, and H Demsetz. "Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization." American Economic Review LXII (1972): 772-795.

  49. Jensen, M.C, and W Meckling. "Theory Of The Firms: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, And Ownership Structure." Journal of Financial Economics III, no. 2 (1976): 305-360.

  50. Adbullah, Haslinda, and Benedict Valentine. "Fundamental And Ethics Theories Of Corporate Governance." Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, no. 4 (2009).

  51. Tirole, Jean. Theories of Corporate Finance. 1st. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

  52. Davis, J.H, F.D Schoorman, and L Donaldson. "Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management." Academy of Management Review XXII (1997): 20-47.

  53. Shleifer, A.K, and R.W Vishny. "A Survey Of Corporate Governance." Journal of Finance LII, no. 2 (1997): 737-783.

  54. Donalson, T., and L.E Preston. "Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns." Academy Of Management Review XX, no. 1 (1995): 65-91.

  55. Safieddine, Assem, Young Lee, and Donna F. Anderson. "Corporate Governance, Capital Budgeting, and Cost of Capital." In CFA Program Curriculum Level I, Vol. 4, by CFA Institute, edited by Assem Safieddine, Young Lee and Donna F. Anderson, 25-80. Charlottesville: Wiley, 2018.

  56. Sundaram, A.K, and A.C Inkpen. "The Corporate Objective Revisited." Organization Science XV, no. 3 (2004): 350-363.

  57. Clarkson, M.B.E. "A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance." Academy of Management Review XX, no. 1 (1995): 92-117.

  58. Edgar A. Norton, Jr, Kenneth L. Parkinson, and Pamela Peterson Drake. "Working Capital Management." In CFA Program Curriculum Level I, Vol. 4, by CFA Institute, edited by Jr Edgar A. Norton, Kenneth L. Parkinson, and Pamela Peterson Drake, 225-289. Charlottesville: Wiley, 2018.

  59. Shin, Hyun-Han, and Luc Soenen. "Efficiency of Working Capital Management and Corporate Profitability." Financial Practice and Education VIII (1998): 37-45.

  60. Modigliani, F., and M.H. Miller. "The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment." The American Economic Review XLVIII, no. 3 (1958): 261-297.

  61. Linh Anh. Kinh tế Việt Nam: 10 năm thăng trầm. January 9, 2019. (accessed February 15, 2019).

  62. Elizabeth A. Gordon, Elaine Henry. "Non-Current (Long-Term) Liabilities." In CFA Program Curriculum Level I, Vol. 3, edited by Elaine Henry Elizabeth A. Gordon, 835-920. Charlottesville: Wiley, 2018.

  63. Elizabeth A. Gordon, Elaine Henry. "Long lived assets." In CFA Program Curriculum Level I, Vol. 3, edited by Elaine Henry Elizabeth A. Gordon, 656-776. Charlottesville: Wiley, 2018.

  64. Broihahn, Michael. "Inventories." In CFA Program Curriculum Level I, Vol. 3, edited by Michael Broihahn, 561-655. Charlottesville: Wiley, 2018.

  65. Siminica, Marian, Daniel Ciriumaru, and Dalia Simion. "The Correlation between Return on Assets and the Measures of Financial Balance for Romanian Companies." International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences VI, no. 2 (2012): 249-256.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle