Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

Published: 13 February 2020

Discourse of Gotong Royong Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle in Kulon Progo, Special Region of Yogyakarta

Wahyu Hidayat, RB. Soemanto, Supriyadi

Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1991.03.01.153

Pages: 119-128

Keywords: Discourse, Gotong Royong, Local Leader Election, Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle

Abstract

Indonesian political party face high financing issues in each political momentum. This research aims to explain the discourse of gotong royong in the effort to be victorious couple of Hasto Wardoyo – Sutedjo in elections 2017 Kulon Progo Regency. This study is a qualitative study using the theoretical references of the thought of Michel Foucault. The research informant is the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle cadres in Kulon Progo regency. The research informant consisted main informant Kulon Progo Regent 2017-2023 and key informant were DPD Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle DIY and DPC Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle in Kulon Progo. Data collection techniques used interview and documentation. Technique of analysis used interactive model. The results of this study showed that the discourse of mutual assistance in the internal party of PDI struggle serves to activate party cadre militancy in carrying out the duties of the parties, especially in the effort to win the spouse of Hasto Wardoyo – Sutedjo at the momentum of the election 2017 in Kulon Progo. Then, gotong royong as a local genius has become the social norm of people in Kulon Progo, so the discourse is more easily accepted and considered as a form of truth by society.

References

  1. Almond, Gabriel A dan Sidney Verba. 1990. Budaya Politik: Tingkah Laku Politik dan Demokrasi di Lima Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  2. Althusser, Louis. 2006. Tentang Ideologi: Marxisme Strukturalis, Psikoanalisis, Cultural Studies. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  3. Arikunto. 2007. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Aksara.
  4. Bryce, James dalam Richard S. Katz & William Crotty. 2006. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage Publications.
  5. Carothers, Thomas. 2006. Confronting the Weakest Link: Aiding Political Parties in Nre Democracies, Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment in International Peace.
  6. C.S.T, Kansil dan Christine S.T, Kansil. 2005. Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
  7. Damsar. 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Politik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta. Kencana.
  8. Duverger, Maurice. 2003. Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  9. Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideologi: An Introduction. New York: Verso.
  10. Eriyanto. 2003. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  11. Eklof, Stefan. 2003. Power and political culture in Suharto’s Indonesia: The Indonesia Democratic Party (PDI) and decline of the new order (1986-98). London: Taylor & Francis.
  12. Foucault, Michel. 2002. Kegilaan dan Peradaban. Yogyakarta: IKON.
  13. ………………….2002. Arkeologi Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Qalam.
  14. ………………….2002. Wacana, Kuasa/ Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Bentang.
  15. ………………….2007. Agama, Budaya dan Seksualitas. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  16. Firmanzah, 2008. Mengelola Partai Politik: Komunikasi dan Positioning, Ideologi Politik dan Era Demokrasi (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  17. -------------, 2013. Marketing Politik: Antara Pemahaman dan Realitas. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  18. H I., A Rahman, 2007. Sistem Politik Indonesia. Yogyakarta. Graha Ilmu.
  19. Kartodirjo, Sartono. 1987. Gotong Royong: Saling Menolong dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat Indonesia, dalam Nat J Colleta dan Umar Khayam (editor). Kebudayaan dan Pembangunan sebuah pendekatan Terhadap Antropologi Terapan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
  20. Larrain, Jorge. 1996. Konsep Ideologi. Yogyakarta: LKPSM.
  21. Mannheim, Kalr.1991. Ideologi dan Utopia: Menyingkap Kaitan Pikiran dan Politik. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  22. Marx, Kalr dan Friedrich Engels. 2012. Ideologi Jerman: Jilid I Feuerbach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Nusantara.
  23. Miriam, Budiardjo. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
  24. -----------------------, 1998. Partisipasi dan Partai Politik. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  25. Michles, Robert. 1984. Partai Politik: Kecenderungan Oligarkis dalam Birokrasi. Jakarta. CV. Rajawali.
  26. Miles, Matthew B dan Huberman, A Michael. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
  27. Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
  28. Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD). 2006. Suatu Kerangka Kerja Pengembangan Partai Politik Yang Demokratis, Jakarta: NIMD.
  29. Neumann, Sigmund. 1963. Modern Political Parties in Comparative Politics: A Reader. London: The Free Pressof Glencoe.
  30. Sarman, Mukhtar. 2015. Pilkada Serentak: Quo Vadis Kedaulatan Rakyat. Banjarmasin: Program Magister Sains Administrasi Pembangungan UNLAM.
  31. Simon, Roger. 1999. Gagasan-gagasan Politik Gramsci. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar dan Insist Press.
  32. Sutopo, HB. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Penerapnnya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.
  33. Sumarno. 2006. Drama Politik Pilkada Depok: Badrul Kamal Menggugat, Nur Mahmudi Menjawab. Bandung: Harakatuna.
  34. Suseno, Franz-Magnis. 1992. Filsafat Sebagai Ilmu Kritis. Jakarta: Kanisiun.
  35. Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government in the United States. New York: Rinehart.
  36. Slembrouck, Stef. 2006 “What is Meant by Discourse Analysis . Belgium: Ghent University.
  37. Shills, Edward. 1972. Ideology, dalam International Encyclopedia of the Social Change, Vol. 7, P.66-77. New York: The McMillan and The Free Press.
  38. Slamet, Yulis. 2006. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Surakarta: UNS Press.
  39. Takwim, Bagus. 2009. Akar-Akar Ideologi: Pengantar Kajian Konsep Ideologi dari Plato hingga Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  40. Tew, J. 2002. Social Theory, Power and Practive. New York: Palgrave Macmilln.
  41. Tomsa, Dirk. 2010. The Indonesian Party System After the 2009 Elections: Towards Stability? In Problems of Democratization in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions, and Society, ed. Edward Aspinall and Marcus Mietzner. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  42. Wilcox, Fransesca Vassalo dan Clyde. 2006. Part is a Carrier of Ideas. London: Sage Publications.
  43. Yin, Robert K. 2008. Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode; Penerjemah, M. Djauzi Mudzakir. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved