top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 24 May 2019

Perceived Threat Had a Greater Impact Than Contact with Immigrants on Brexit Vote

Julian R.P. Bond, Ricardo Tejeiro

The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), Laureate Online Education (Netherlands)

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.02.02.74

Pages: 333-346

Keywords: Intergroup Threat, Contact Theory, Prejudice, Brexit, Immigration, Voting Behaviour

Abstract

In the early 21st century, the United Kingdom (UK) witnessed a significant rise in net immigration, partly caused by freedom of movement within the European Union (EU). In response to political pressures, a referendum on EU membership was held in June 2016, resulting in a narrow majority for leaving the EU. This paper analyses the relative impact of contact and perceived threat on prejudice and voting behaviour in the referendum based on a sample of 1127 UK adults. While racial prejudice was a significant predictor of stated voting behaviour in the referendum, the relationship of voting with perceived threat was greater. Both factors were around five times more predictive of voting behaviour than contact. Both prejudice towards and perceived threat from EU immigrants was significantly more predictive than the same measures across all immigrants, suggesting that the impact of these variables on voting behaviour was more nuanced than a general negativity towards immigrants. There was no evidence that any positive effect of contact in reducing prejudice cumulates over multiple touchpoints.

References

  1. Abrams, D., & Travaglino, G. A. (2018).  Immigration, political trust, and Brexit – Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis.  British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12233

  2. Allport, G.W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice.  Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

  3. Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R., Harwood, J., ... & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629-1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953

  4. Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., ... & Leyens, J. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843 - 856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470

  5. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceived threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 253 - 267. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.2.253

  6. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37005-5

  7. Bullock III, C. S. (1978). Contact theory and racial tolerance among high school students. The School Review, 86(2), 187-216. https://doi.org/10.1086/443405

  8. Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to" prejudice". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770 - 789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770

  9. Dyck, J. J., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2014). To know you is not necessarily to love you: The partisan mediators of intergroup contact. Political Behavior, 36(3), 553-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9240-6

  10. Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2017). Brexit and prejudice against immigrants: the UK is not unique.  Under Submission, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25973.99048 Retrieved June 27, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312057251_BREXIT_AND_PREJUDICE_AGAINST_IMMIGRANTS_THE_UK_IS_NOT_UNIQUE

  11. Forster, K (2016, October 13). Hate crimes soared by 41% after Brexit vote, official figures reveal. The Independent.  Retrieved 3 March 2017. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/brexit-hate-crimes-racism-eu-referendum-vote-attacks-increase-police-figures-official-a7358866.html

  12. Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (1989). The relative size of minority populations and white racial attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 820 - 835.

  13. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004

  14. Hall, M. (2016, June 14). Proof we CAN’T stop migrants: 5 million new EU citizens given right to enter Britain.  The Express. Retrieved March 28, 2017 from  http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/679531/migrant-crisis-five-million-new-EU-citizens-given-right-enter-Britain

  15. Hammersley M. & Woods P. (1993). Gender and Ethnicity in Schools: Ethnographic Accounts.  Abingdon UK: Routledge.

  16. Heinze, J. E., & Horn, S. S. (2009). Intergroup contact and beliefs about homosexuality in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 937-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9408-x

  17. Janmaat, J. G. (2014). Do ethnically mixed classrooms promote inclusive attitudes towards immigrants everywhere? A study among native adolescents in 14 countries. European Sociological Review, 30(6) 810 – 822. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu075

  18. Kagarlitsky, B. (2017). Brexit and the Future of the Left. Globalizations, 14(1), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1228800

  19. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.

  20. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

  21. Khaleeli, H. (2016, June 29). ‘A frenzy of hatred’: How to understand Brexit racism.  The Guardian. Retrieved February 15, 2017 from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/frenzy-hatred-brexit-racism-abuse-referendum-celebratory-lasting-damage

  22. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

  23. Kittles, R. A., & Weiss, K. M. (2003). Race, ancestry, and genes: implications for defining disease risk. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 4(1), 33-67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110356

  24. Koch, I. (2017). What's in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12472

  25. Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013) Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org.