Journal of Social and Political
ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)
ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)
Published: 26 June 2020
Russia and NATO Strategic Corporation
Sahibzada Muhammad Usman
University of Pisa, Italy
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: NATO, EU, Russia, Difference, Opportunities
This paper examines Russia and NATO strategic partnership by investigating both sides perspectives, long-standing hindrances and opportunities. Russia and NATO relations stay to be one of the main strands of global security in the 21st century. Nowadays, given the more perplexing dangers to global security, the increasing energy demand and reliance of Europe, and expanding foreign business between the groups, Russia's links with the West, as a major petroleum exporter and nuclear nation, have become progressively significant. The new security condition of post-September 11 has arranged a shared ground for a strong partnership between old foes. In any case, the endeavors from the two sides have been not able to move beyond a specific degree of collaboration. This paper answers whether it is workable for NATO and Russia to make a decisive victory of lasting legacies of deep-seated hostility and doubt, move beyond historical, religious, cultural differences, and establish the frameworks of an enduring sound partnership.
Andrew Monaghan (January 2010), Introduction to “Indivisibility of Security: Russia and Euro-Atlantic Security.” Forum Paper No.13, 5–25. NATO Defense College.
Andrew Radin/Clint Reach (2017), ‘Russian Views of the International Order’, RAND, Santa Monica, California. www. rand.org/t/RR1826.
CSIS (March 2017), ‘Recalibrating U.S. Strategy Toward Russia. A New Time for Choosing’, Washington D.C.
Donaldson, Robert H. and Nogee, Joseph L (April 18, 2009), The Foreign Policy of Russia: Changing Systems, Enduring Interests. NY: M.E.Sharpe.
Hyde-Price, Adrian (2011:02), “NATO’s Political Transformation and International Order.” In NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, edited by Ringsmose and Sten Rynning, 45–55. Danish Institute for International Studies Report.
Kaczmarski, Marcin (Mar/Apr 2012: 3), Domestic Sources of Russia’s China Policy. Problems of Post- Communism. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1013444519?accountid=12702.
Katsioulis, Christos (January 2011), “The New NATO Strategy: A Temporary Compromise.” International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Kimberly Martin (March 2017), ‘Reducing Tensions Between Russia and NATO’, Council on Foreign Relations, Council Special Report 79, New York.
Kuchins, Andrew, “Russian Perspectives on China: Strategic Ambivalence.” In The Future of China-Russia Relations, edited by Bellacqua.
Lo, Bobo (2008), Axis of convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. London, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Mankoff, Jeffrey (2009), Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics. NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Mölder, Holger (2006), “NATO’s Role in the Post-Modern European Security Environment, Cooperative Security and the Experience of the Baltic Sea Region.” Baltic Security & Defence Review, Volume 8. http://www.bdcol.ee/files/docs/bsdr/1-NATO, European Security and the Baltic Sea Region-Holger Molder.pdf.
Ponsard, Lionel (2007), Russia, NATO and cooperative Security: Bridging the Gap. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
Sloan, Stanley R. (2010), Permanent Alliance? NATO and the Transatlantic Bargain from Truman to Obama. New York, NY: Continuum.
Trenin, Dmitri (November 2007), “Russia’s Threat Perception and Strategic Posture.” In Russian Security Strategy under Putin: U.S. and Russian Perspectives. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub829.pdf.
Wittmann, Klauss (2011:02), “An Alliance for the 21st century? Reviewing NATO’s New Strategic Concept.” In Nato’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, edited by Ringsmose and Sten Rynning. Danish Institute for International Studies Report.