Ties Strength and Knowledge Transfer: Investigation of Innovation Diffusion in Co-Authorship Networks

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

Published: 30 May 2019

Ties Strength and Knowledge Transfer: Investigation of Innovation Diffusion in Co-Authorship Networks

Reza Yamini

University of Science and Technology of China

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1991.02.02.76

Pages: 356-365

Keywords: Knowledge Transfer, Intra-Network Learning, Ties Strength, Bibliography Network, Diffusion of Innovation

Abstract

This study investigates the factors affecting the output of authors' cooperation. This cooperation can have a crucial role in the development of economics and technology in different fields. The investigated factors can create outputs that are more innovative and lead to better performance of intra-alliance and inter-alliance networks. The focus of this study is on transferring or exchanging intra information resources at the ego (small groups embedded in a network) and dyad levels of cooperation (individuals embedded in a group) shaped as an egocentric network using social network theory. The theory explains the effect that the strength of interpersonal ties at the dyad level has on knowledge exchange by considering how redundant information can be when it is received by an ego in networks. The authors of this paper demonstrate differences of information diffusion depending on the strength of interpersonal ties created by first authors. This study considered results of 206 studies in two areas of social science (economics and tourism) through an examination of quantitative data extracted from the Web of Science using the Histcite software. Amos was used for testing mediation effects, and SPSS version 23 was used to analyze the data via Hierarchal Learner Modeling (HLM) methodology.

References

  1. Aral, S., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. American journal of sociology, 117(1), 90-171.

  2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky' and global ‘ubiquitous' knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77-86.

  3. Baum, J. A., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Companion to organizations: An introduction. The Blackwell companion to organizations, 1-34.

  4. Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 366-385.

  5. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.

  6. Bou, J. C., & Satorra, A. (2007). The persistence of abnormal returns at industry and firm levels: Evidence from Spain. Strategic management journal, 28(7), 707-722.

  7. Bou, J. C., & Satorra, A. (2010). A multigroup structural equation approach: A demonstration by testing variation of firm profitability across EU samples. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 738-766.

  8. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med, 357(4), 370-379. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa066082

  9. Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of business venturing, 18(6), 689-708.

  10. Dodds, P. S., Muhamad, R., & Watts, D. J. (2003). An experimental study of search in global social networks. science, 301(5634), 827-829. doi:10.1126/science.1081058

  11. Fan, Y. (2002). Ganxi's consequences: Personal gains at social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(4), 371-380.

  12. Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2006). Small worlds and regional innovation.

  13. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research policy, 30(7), 1019-1039.

  14. Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1994). Advances in the social and behavioral sciences from social network analysis. SAGE FOCUS EDITIONS, 171, xi-xi.

  15. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

  16. Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. science, 308(5722), 697-702. doi:10.1126/science.1106340

  17. Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.

  18. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.

  19. Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional studies, 38(8), 879-891.

  20. Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of experimental social psychology, 45(5), 1057-1067.

  21. Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual review of sociology, 16(1), 435-463.

  22. Marsden, P. V., & Gorman, E. H. (1999). Social capital in internal staffing practices Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 180-196): Springer.

  23. Mowery, D. C., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science, 48(1), 73-89.

  24. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 116-145.

  25. Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling: Scientific Software International.

  26. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles (Vol. 1): McGraw-Hill New York.

  27. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational research methods, 13(3), 456-476.

  28. Tong, J., & Mitra, A. (2009). Chinese cultural influences on knowledge management practice. Journal of knowledge management, 13(2), 49-62.

  29. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 172-187.

  30. Uzzi, B., Guimera, R., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. (2006). Emergence: The dynamics of network formation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

  31. Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(6), 779.

  32. Zaheer, A., Gözübüyük, R., & Milanov, H. (2010). It's the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 62-77.

  33. Zheng, Y., & Yang, H. (2015). Does familiarity foster innovation? The impact of alliance partner repeatedness on breakthrough innovations. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), 213-230.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle