Journal of Social and Political
Sciences
ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)
ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)
Published: 10 June 2022
The Role of Informal and Formal Mechanisms in Transitional Justice Related to the 1965-1966 Incident in Indonesia: The Case of Palu
Agus Supratikno
Satya Wacana Christian University, Indonesia
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1991.05.02.353
Pages: 135-147
Keywords: Transitional Justice, Restorative Justice, Informal Mechanism of SKP-HAM, Formal Mechanism of Palu Regional Government, The 1965-1966 Victims
Abstract
This article discusses the role of the informal mechanism introduced by the solidarity for victims of human rights violations of Central Sulawesi and the formal mechanism of the Palu Regional Government, which succeeded in realising restorative justice related to the 1965-1966 incident in Palu through truth-seeking, grassroots reconciliation, apology, and victims' reparations. How did this local initiative succeed amid the stagnation of the national initiative? This research applied a qualitative method. This study found the critical elements of the local initiatives' success in Palu: First, the use of the informal and formal transitional justice mechanisms. Although informal mechanisms could play a significant role in actualising restorative justice in Palu, the role of formal mechanisms remained irreplaceable because particular aspects could not be done through informal mechanisms, such as victim reparations. Collaborating between the two mechanisms made the local initiatives more effective and broader impact. Another essential element behind the realisation of restorative justice in Palu is the role of political actors, namely Rusdy Mastura, Palu' mayor (2010-2015) and Nurlaela Lamasitudju (General Secretary of SKP-HAM). The strong political will of the Palu Mayor was depicted through an apology and reparations program for the 1965-1966 victims, and the lobbies that have been carried out by the general secretary of SKP-HAM have an essential role in realising restorative justice related to the 1965-1966 incident in Palu.
References
Budiawan. (2004). Mematahkan Pewarisan Ingatan Wacana: Anti-Komunis dan Politik Rekonsiliasi Pasca-Soeharto (Breaking the Immortalized Past: Anti- Communist Discourse and Reconciliatory Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia). Jakarta: Elsam.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran (Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approaches) (4trd ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Cribb, R. (2002). Unresolved Problems in the in the Indonesian Killings of 1965–1966. Asian Survey, 42(4), 550–563.
Farid, H., & Simarmata, R. (2004). Demi Kebenaran: Pemetaan Upaya-Upaya Pencarian Keadilan dalam Masa Transisi di Indonesia (For the sake of Truth: Mapping Efforts to Seek Justice in the Transitional Period in Indonesia). In Seri Transitional Justice. Jakarta: Elsam.
Firdaus, M. S., Muhidin, M. I., Iksan, M. H., & Lapasere, I. (2015). Ringkasan Eksekutif: Penelitian dan Verifikasi Pelanggaran HAM Peristiwa 1965-1966 di Kota Palu (Executive Summary: Research and Verification of Human Rights Violations in the 1965-1966 Incident in Palu City). Bappeda Kota Palu.
ICTJ. (2009). What is Transitional Justice? International Center for Transitional Justice, 2. http://ictj.org/about/transitional-justice
Komnas HAM. (2012). Pernyataan Komnas HAM Tentang Hasil Penyelidikan Pelanggaran HAM yang Berat Peristiwa 1965-1966 (Ringkasan Eksekutif) (Statement of the National Human Rights Commission Regarding the Results of Investigation of Serious Human Rights Violations of 1965-1966) (Executive Summary). https://jdih.komnasham.go.id/assets/uploads/files/info_hukum/eksekutif summary peristiwa 1965.pdf
KontraS. (2014). Hak Asasi Diakui tapi Tidak Dilindungi: Catatan Hak Asasi Manusia dimasa Pemerintahan Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (Human Rights Recognized but Not Protected: Human Rights Records during the Government of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono) [2004-2014](https://kontras.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Buku-Sbeye1.pdf
KontraS. (2018). Catatan Evaluasi 4 Tahun Kinerja Pemerintahan Joko Widodo – Jusuf Kalla Kabinet Indonesia Kerja Sektor Hak Asasi Manusia HAM Bukan Prioritas (Evaluation Notes for Four Years of Performance of the Government of Joko Widodo – Jusuf Kalla of the Indonesian Cabinet Working in the Human Rights Sector- Human Rights are not a Priority). https://kontras.org/2018/10/19/catatan-evaluasi-4-tahun-kinerja-pemerintahan-joko-widodo-jusuf-kalla-kabinet-indonesia-kerja/
Linton, S. (2006). Accounting for Atrocities in Indonesia. Singapore Year Book of International Law, 11, 195-259.
Nagy, R. (2002). Reconciliation in Post-Commission South Africa: Thick and Thin Accounts of Solidarity. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 323–346.
Sukanta, P. O. (2013). Sulawesi Bersaksi (Sulawesi Testifies). Lembaga Kreatifitas Kemanusiaan. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwCCuhIFVv_nM01sZkU4SXQxWTQ/edit?pli=1
Quinn, J. R. (2005 June 2). The Role of Informal Mechanisms in Transitional Justice(Paper presentation). A paper prepared for presentation on the panel “Transitional Justice: Local and International Dimensions,” at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 1–20.
Robinson, G. B. (2018). The Killing Season: A History of the Indonesian Massacres, 1965-1966. Princeton University Press.
Suh, J. (2012). The Politics of Transitional Justice in Post-Suharto Indonesia (PhD Thesis, Ohio State University). https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=osu1343450141&disposition=
Sujatmoko, A. (2020). Victim’s Reparation of The 1965-1966 Gross Human Rights Violations in Palu City. MIMBAR HUKUM, 32(1), 145–158.
Surya, G. (2016). Membangun Kehidupan Baru Tanpa Stigma (Building a New Life Without Stigma). In Budiawan & R. I. Rahayu (Eds.), Rekonsiliasi Kultural Tragedi 1965 (Cultural Reconciliation of the 1965 Tragedy) (pp. 111–157). Yogyakarta: Syarikat Indonesia.
Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press.
Wahyuningroem, S. L. (2013). Seducing for Truth and Justice: Civil Society Initiatives for the 1965 Mass Violence in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32(3), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341303200306
Wahyuningroem, S. L. (2018). From State to Society: Democratisation and the Failure of Transitional Justice in Indonesia (PhD Thesis, The Australian National University). https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/147869
Wahyuningroem, S. L. (2019). Towards Post-Transitional Justice. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 3(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v3i1.11497
Webster, D. (2017). Truth and Reconciliation in Southeast Asia and the Melanesian Pacific: Potential Canadian Contributions and Potential Lessons for Canada. International Journal, 72(1), 120–130.
Yayasan International People’s Tribunal. (2016). Laporan Akhir International People’s Tribunal (International People's Tribunal Final Report). https://www.tribunal1965.org/tribunal-1965/laporan-sidang/
Zalaquett, J. (1995). Confronting Human Rights Violations Committed by Former Governments: Principles Applicable and Political Constraints. In Neil J. Kritz (eds), Transitional Justice (pp. 3-33). United States Institute of Peace Press.