top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 22 August 2023

Quality in Education: Ascertaining the Use of Rubrics for Successful Implementation of OBE at the Tertiary Level in Bangladesh

Tasnia Farzana, Adil Ilahi

Cox’s Bazar International University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 135-153

Keywords: Rubric, Outcome-Based Education, Rubric Design, Rubric Types


This article highlights the potential of rubrics as tools for effective assessment in education by encouraging students to pursue high-quality education, assessing students in ways other than traditional testing, and fostering outcome-based education. It highlights the importance of quantitative research for data gathering and analysis, as well as the use of statistical applications like SPSS for data analysis in educational research. The study examines various types of rubrics and their components to create a full rubric for classroom effectiveness. It also provides literature on appropriate rubric usage for students and teachers, as well as rubric researchers. The findings suggest that a nationwide database of discipline-specific rubrics is necessary for preserving and advancing standards in technical and higher education. A guidelines handbook should be developed before employing rubrics. Implementing rubrics at elementary and secondary levels is essential for students to advance to higher education, as they may be exposed to unprepared OBE approaches in cities with inadequate communication and technology skills. The Ministry of Higher Education should determine teaching obligations and responsibilities, and universities should implement rubrics immediately and emphasise them. The findings are relevant to both students and teachers, emphasising the importance of user perception, rubric design, and intended use in determining the usefulness of rubrics in raising student performance. By optimising variables based on trustworthy data and knowledge of the intended educational context, educators can maximise students' learning opportunities.


  1. Allen, D. & Tanner, K. (2006). Rubrics: Tools for Making Learning Goals and Evaluation Criteria Explicit for Both Teachers and Learners. CBE—Life Sciences Education. Vol. 5, No. 3 Features. Retrieved from

  2. Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching. Vol. 53, No. 1 (Winter, 2005), pp. 27-30. Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Retrieved from

  3. Andrade, H. G. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4(4). Retrieved from

  4. Andrade, "Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning."

  5. Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Corwin Press.

  6. Baguio, J. (2019). Outcomes-based education: teachers' attitude and implementation. Univ. Bohol Multidiscipl. Res. J. 7 (September), 110-127.

  7. Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other parados pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180-191. Retrieved from

  8. Breekbart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343-368. Retrieved from

  9. Bresciani M. J., Zelva C. L., Anderson J. A. (2004).  Assessing Student Learning and Development: A Handbook for Practitioners. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. Criteria and rubrics; pp. 29-37.

  10. Briones, G. K. P., Solórzano, D. A. N., & Moreira, E. A. V. Rubrics implementation on learning evaluation for superior basic students. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(2), 1-8. Retrieved from

  11. Brookhart, S. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

  12. Brookhart, S. M., & Chen, F. (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educational Review, 67(3), 343–368. Retrieved from

  13. Brooks, G. (2012). Assessment and Academic Writing: A Look at the Use of Rubrics in the Second Language Writing Classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, Vol. 17, Nishinomiya, Japan. Pp. 227-240.

  14. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97-113. Retrieved from

  15. Bryman. A. 2012. Social research methods 4' ed.) New York: Oxtord University Press.

  16. Chase, C. I. (1999). Contemporary assessment for educators. New York: Longman.

  17. Chowdhury, F. (2019). Application of rubrics in the classroom: A vital tool for improvement in assessment, feedback and learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 61–68.Retried from

  18. Coe, D. P., Pivarnik, J. M., Womack, C. J., Reeves, M. J., & Malina, R. M. (2006). Effect of physical education and activity levels on academic achievement in children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(8), 1515- 1519. Retrieved from

  19. Connolly, P. (2007). Quantitative Data Analysis in Education: A Critical Introduction Using SPSS. London: Routledge. Retrieved from

  20. Crumly, C., & Dietz, P. (2014). Pedagogies for student-centered learning: Online and on-ground. Augsburg Fortress Pub- lishers. Retrieved from

  21. Crusan, D. J. (2015). Dance, ten; looks, three: Why rubrics matter. Assessing Writing, 26, 1-4. Retrieved from

  22. Crusan, D. (2010). Assessment in the Second Language Writing Classroom. The University of MichiganPress. Retrieved from

  23. Chuan, C.L., Penyelidikan, J. (2006). Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power analysis: a comparison. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL 7 (1), 78-86.

  24. Dickinson, P. & Adams, J. (2017). Values in Evaluation-The Use of Rubrics.Evaluation and Program Planning. 65, pp.113-116.

  25. Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., & Segers, M. (2006). Learning and the emerging new assessment culture. In L. Verschafel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts & S.Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends (pp.191-206). Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  26. Lynd-Balta E. (2006). Using literature and innovative assessments to ignite interest and cultivate critical thinking skills in an undergraduate neuroscience course. CBE Life Sci. Educ 5, 167-174.

  27. Lowe, M. S., Booth, C., Stone, S., & Tagge, N. (2015). Impacting Information Literacy Learning in First-Year Seminars: A Rubric-Based Evaluation. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 15(3), 489–512.

  28. Gallardo, Katherina. (2020). Competency-based assessment and the use of performance-based evaluation rubrics in higher education: challenges the next decade. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1):61-79. DOI:10.33225/pec/20.78.61

  29. Grant P. Wiggins and Jay McTighe. (2005). Understanding by Design (Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development); Biggs and Tang, Teaching for Quality Learning at University.

  30. Grubb, M. (1981). Using holistic evaluation (First). Encino, CA.: Glenco Publishing.

  31. Grudnitski, G. (1997). A forecast of achievement from student profile data. Journal of Accounting Education, 15(4), 549-558. Retrieved from

  32. Gupta, BL. & Gupta., P.B. (2021). Rubrics as Versatile Educational Tool for Outcome-Based Education. Journal of Engineering & Technology Education, Vol. 15, No. 2. Retrieved from

  33. Guskey, T. R. (2016). How classroom assessments improve learning. In M. Scherer (Ed.), On formative assessment: Readings from Educational Leadership (pp. 3–13). ASCD.

  34. Hannafin, M. J., & Hannafin, K. M. (2010). Cognition and student-centered, web-based learning: Issues and implications for research and theory. In J. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, & S. D. Kinshuk (Eds.) Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 11-23). Retrieved from

  35. Hassan. S. (2000, September 5). Outcome-based Education: A New Dimension in Higher Education. The Independent. Retrieved from

  36. Huba, Mary E.; Freed, Jann E. (2000) Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. 170. Retrieved from

  37. Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill IV, G. W., McEntarffer, R., Mehrotra, C. Nesmith, R., Weaver, K. A., & Whitlock, K. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 196-208. Retrieved from

  38. Hillman, C. H., Erickson, K. I., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1), 58. Retrieved from

  39. Hillman, C. H., Pontifex, M. B., Raine, L. B., Castelli, D. M., Hall, E. E., & Kramer, A. F. (2009). The effect of acute treadmill walking on cognitive control and academic achievement in preadolescent children. Neuroscience, 159(3), 1044-1054. Retrieved from

  40. Howell, R. J. (2011). Exploring the impact of grading rubrics on academic performance: Findings from experimental, pre-post evaluation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(2), 31-49.

  41. Howell, R. J. (2014). Grading rubrics: Hoopla or help? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 5400-410. Retrieved from

  42. Jae, H., & Cowling, J. (2009). Objectivity in grading: The promise of bar codes. College Teaching, 57(1), 51. Retrieved from

  43. Jaidev. R. (2011). Rubrics-Based Writing: Liberating Rather Than Restricting in Many Contexts. ELTWO Online. Retrieved from

  44. Janssen, G., Meier, V., & Trace, J. (2015). Building a Better Rubric: Mixed Methods Rubric Revision. Assessing Writing. Volume 26, 51–66. Retrieved from

  45. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130−144.

  46. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Pychologist, 58(9), 697. https:/ / 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

  47. Karkehabadi, S. (2013). Using rubrics to measure and enhance student performance. Northern Virginia Community College. Retrieved from

  48. Katherina G. (2020). Competency-Based Assessment and the use of Performance-Based Evaluation Rubrics in Higher Education: Challenges towards the Next Decade Problems of Education in the 21 Century. Vol. 78, No. 1, Pp. 61.

  49. Loreto, M.M. ( 2018). Outcomes based teaching and learning practices in the hotel and resort management program of Dusit Thani College. Dusit Thani College J. 12 (May), 82-98. Special Issue.

  50. Lowe, M. S., Booth, C., Stone, S., & Tagge, N. (2015). Impacting Information Literacy Learning in First-Year Seminars: A Rubric-Based Evaluation. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 15(3), 489-512.

  51. Luft J. A. (1999). Rubrics: design and use in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education. Published By: Springer, Vol. 10, No. 2 (1999), pp. 107-121. Retrieved from

  52. Malan, S.P.T., (2000). The'new paradigm'of outcomes-based education in perspective. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences. 28 (1).

  53. Martínez-Figueira, E.; Tellado-González, F. & Raposo-Rivas, M. (2013). La rúbrica como instrumento para la autoevaluación: un estudio piloto. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, Vol.11 (2) 373-390.

  54. Menéndez-Varela, J. L., & Gregori-Giralt, E. (2016). The contribution of rubrics to the validity of performance assessment: A study of the conservation–restoration and design undergraduate degrees. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 228-244. Retrieved from

  55. Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing score rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(25), 1-8. Retrieved from

  56. Mitra, S., Gupta, S. (2020). Mobile learning under personal cloud with a virtualization framework for outcome based education. Education and Information Technologies. 25 (3), 2129-2156.

  57. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 99-113. Retrieved from

  58. Moril, R., Ballester,L. & Martínez, J. (2012). Introducción de las matrices de valoración analítica en el proceso de evaluación del Practicum de los Grados de Infantil y de Primaria. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, Vol.10 (2), 251-271.

  59. Moskal, Barbara M. (2000). Scoring Rubrics: What, When and How? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation: Vol. 7 , Article 3. DOI:

  60. Nasab, F. G. (2015). Alternative versus traditional assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research,2(6), 165-178.

  61. Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., Thomas, S., & Le, N. Q. (2020). The role of rubrics in learning and implementation of authentic assessment: A Literature review. In M. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of InSITE 2020: Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference, pp. 237-276. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved from

  62. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational Assessment of Students (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education

  63. Noyes, Ernest C. (1912). Progress in Standardizing the Measurement of Composition.English Journal 1.9, 532-36.

  64. Nsabayezu, E. lyamuremye, A. Nsengimana, T. (2022). The progress in the application of rubric materials in chemistry teaching and students' learning enhancement during 21st century: a systematic review. Discover Education 1, Article number: 5. Retrieved from

  65. Ortega, R.A.A., Cruz, R., 2016. Educators' attitude towards outcomes-based educational approach in English second language learning. Am. J. Educ. Res. 4 (8), 597-601.

  66. Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  67. Popham, W. James. (1997, October 1). “What's Wrong—and What's Right—with Rubrics”.Vol. 55, No. 2. 72–75

  68. Porter J. R. (2005). Information literacy in biology education: an example from an advanced cell biology course. Cell Biol. Educ 4, 335-343.

  69. Ragupathi, K., Lee, A. (2020). Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education. Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education. Publisher: Springer Singapore. 73-95. Retrieved from

  70. Rodriguez, I., & Gallardo, K. (2017). Redesigning an educational technology course under a of the educational assessment from learning outcomes to competencies: one program’s transition. competency-based performance assessment model. Pedagogika, 127(3), 186–204. Retrieved from DOI:

  71. Rosenzweig, P. (2014). The halo effect and the eight other business delusions that deceive managers. Simon and Schuster.

  72. Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates. - Teaching Resources. North Carolina State University. Retrieved from>

  73. Shahidul, MM. H. (2020). Outcome-Based Education. The Daily New Nation. Retrieved from

  74. Silva, R. D. (2014). Rubrics for Assessment: Their Efects on ESL Students’ Authentic Task Performance. CELC SYMPOSIUM, 19, Centre for English Language Communication, National University of Singapore. 136-141. Retrieved from

  75. Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment. Merrill Prentice Hall.

  76. Spady, W.G. (1988).Organizing for results: the basis of authentic restructuring and reform. Educational Leadership. 46 (2), 4-8.

  77. SPADY, WG. (1994). Outcome-based education. Critical issues and answers. Arlington. American Association of School Administrators. P.1-212

  78. Suskie, L. (2010).  Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pp. 19-35. Retrieved from

  79. Suskie, L. (2018). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

  80. Taggart, G. L., Phifer, S. J., Nixon, J. A., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (2001). Rubrics: A handbook for construction and use. Scarecrown Press

  81. Tedick, D. J. (2002). Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: Standards, philosophies, and considerations for assessment. In Minnesota Articulation Project, D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Proficiency-oriented language instruction and assessment: A curriculum handbook for teachers (Rev Ed.). CARLA Working Paper Series. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. Available online.

  82. Template of Outcome Based Education (OBE) Curriculum. (2020, June 25). University GRANTS COMMISSION OF BANGLADESH. Retrieved from

  83. Thomas R. Guskey. (2016). New Direction in the Development of Rubrics. Retrieved from

  84. Truemper, C.M. ( 2004). Using scoring rubrics to facilitate assessment and evaluation of graduate-level nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 43 ( 12), 562-564. Retrieved from

  85. Turley, E., & Gallagher, C. (2008). On the uses of rubrics: Reframing the great rubric debate. English Journal, 97(4), 87−92.Published By: National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved from

  86. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

  87. Wiggins G. (1989). A true test: toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 49, 703-713.

  88. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  89. Wolf†, K. and Stevens, E. (2007). The Role of Rubrics in Advancing and Assessing Student Learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 7, No. 1, 3-14. Retrieve from

  90. Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 92-97.

  91. Young, C. (2013). Initiating self-assessment strategies in novice physiotherapy students: A method case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 998-1011. Retrieved from

  92. Young, L. P. (2009). Imagine creating rubrics that develop creativity. English Journal, 99(2), 74.

bottom of page