top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 10 September 2021

Rethinking the Design of English Language Teaching Online Using the Flipped Classroom Approach

Rose Jummai MUSA, Ogheneyerhowo Monica EJOVI, Felix Oghenefega OGHENERHOVWEYA

University of Benin (Nigeria), Ovu Grammar School (Nigeria)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 424-431

Keywords: Design, Online Teaching, Flipped Classroom Approach, English Language


Online teaching has been in use for a while, but not many people cared to embrace it as a method of teaching until the COVID-19 pandemic literally forced them into giving it a consideration. The sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic led to the shutting down of schools across the country and several parts of the world. Consequently, many state governments and educational institutions turned to media broadcasts as well as online teaching to keep learners engaged. For the first time in decades, teleconferencing applications and Internet services such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Skype witnessed a surge in their use for teaching and learning as well as for conducting meetings in different spheres of life such as governance and business. Thus, many English language instructors began to teach online without any appreciable time to understand the specialized techniques for the design of online teaching for maximum benefit to learners. Many English language instructors arranged for synchronous online classes that lasted between one to three hours. From personal experiences, the researchers observed that many learners in such classes experienced boredom and disengaged from the live online classes. This prompted the researchers to rethink how online English language teaching can be designed for maximum engagement of learners. This paper proposes the incorporation of the flipped classroom approach into the design of online English language teaching and presents steps that English language instructors need to take to be able to incorporate the flipped classroom approach into online English Language teaching for maximum benefits and learners’ engagement.


  1. Al-Maqtri, M. A. T. (2014). How effective is e-learning in teaching English?: A case study. Journal of Education and Human Development,3(2), 647-669.

  2. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-learning,7(1), 5-22.

  3. Baghdadi, Z.  D. (2011). Best practices in online education: Online instructors, courses, and administrators. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE,12(3), 1302-6488.

  4. Barbour, M. (2012). Training teachers for a virtual school system: A call to action. Education Faculty Publications. Paper 102.

  5. Barbour, M. K., Siko, J., Gross, E., & Waddell, K. (2013). Virtually unprepared: Examining the preparation of  K-12 online teachers. In R. Hartshorne, T. L. Hefner & T. L. M. Petty (Eds.), Teacher education programs and online learning tools: Innovations in teacher preparation.60-81. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4502-8.ch011

  6. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A.  (2012). Flip your classroom:  Reach every student in every class every day.  Eugene, OR:  International Society for Technology in Education.

  7. Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement and achievement. Graduate Research Papers, 137.

  8. Bourelle, A., Bourelle, T., Knutson, A. V., & Spong, S. (2016). Sites of multimodal literacy: Comparing student learning in online and face-to-face environments. Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, 39, 55-70. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.003

  9. Bozkurt, I. (2012, Winter). Identifying stakeholder needs within online education. The International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-13.

  10. Cole, M. T., Shelly, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-Learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,15(6), 112-131.

  11. Eke, H. N. (2009). The perspective of e-Learning and libraries in Africa:  Challenges and opportunities.  Library Review, 59(4), 274-290.

  12. Evseeva, A. & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.006

  13. Fethi, K. (2015, March). Flipping movies: Why and how? Paper presented at the 8thAnnual Flipped Learning Network Conference, East Lansing, MI.

  14. Fish, W. W., & Wickersham, L. E. (2009).  Best practices for online instructors, reminders.The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 279-284.

  15. Gehringer, E.  F., & Peddycord, B. W. (2013).  The inverted-lecture model:  A case  study in computer architecture. In Proceedings of SIGSE ’13. SIGSE. DOI: 10.1145/2445196.2445343

  16. Haron, N. N., Zaid, Y. H., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2015). E-Learning as a platform to learn English among ESL learners: Benefits and barriers. Research in Language Teaching and Learning,79-105.

  17. Hein, K.  (1999). Face-to-face training:  Un-PC?  Incentive, 173(4), 22-25.

  18. Heppen, J., Sorensen, N., Allensworth, E., Walters, K., Rickles, J., Taylor, S., & Michelman, V. (2017). The struggle to pass algebra: Online vs. face-to-face credit recovery for at-risk urban students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 272-296.

  19. Hill, J. R. (1997). Distance learning environments via world wide web. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction(pp. 75-80). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

  20. Li, Y. W. (2016). Transforming conventional teaching classroom to learner-centred teaching classroom using multimedia-mediated learning module. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 105-112. DOI: 10.7763/IJIET. 2016.V6.667

  21. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013).  How languages are learned. New York: Oxford University Press (4thed.). ISBN: 978 O 19 4541268

  22. Marcey, D. J., & Brint, M. E. (2012).  Transforming an undergraduate introductory biology course through cinematic lectures and inverted classes: A preliminary assessment of the CLIC model of the flipped classroom.

  23. Manoj, K. (2019). Online Learning is education that takes place over the Internet.

  24. Marshall, H. W. (2017). The synchronous online flipped learning approach. FLGI Community Blog.

  25. Marshall, H. W., & Rodriguez Buitrago, C. (2017). The synchronous online flipped learning approach. TEIS News.

  26. Marshall, H. W., & Kostka, I. (2020). Fostering teaching presence through the synchronous online flipped learning approach. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(2), 1 – 14.

  27. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K., SRI International, U. S. Department of Education. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service.

  28. Montiel-Chamorro, M. L. (2018). Comparing online English language learning and face-to-face English language learning at El Bosque University in Colombia. Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University.

  29. Ni, A. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199-215.

  30. Strayer, J.  F. (2007).  The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment:  A  comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. (Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

  31. Tschida, C. M., Hodge, E. M. & Schmidt, S. W. (2016). Learning to teach online: Negotiating issues of platform, pedagogy, and professional development. In V. C. X. Wang, (ed.), Handbook of research on learning outcomes and opportunities in the digital age. 664-684. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-1624-8.ch096

  32. Vaill, A.  L., & Testori, P.  A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three-tiered approach to online faculty development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 111-119.

  33. Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309.

  34. Winger, A. (2019, February). Five ways to flip the online classroom on its head. eLearn Magazine.

  35. Wilkes, R. B., Simon, J. C., & Brooks, L. D. (2006). A comparison of faculty and undergraduate students' perceptions of online courses and degree programs. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(2), 131-140.

  36. Wise, B., & Rothman, R. (2010). The online learning imperative:  A solution to three looming crises in education.  Education Digest, 76(3), 52–58.

  37. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. Jr. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.

  38. Zhu, E., Payette, P., & DeZure, D. (2003). An Introduction to teaching online. CRLT Occasional Papers.

  39. Zucker, A., & Kozma,  R.  (2003). The virtual high school:  Teaching generation V.  New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

bottom of page