top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 23 December 2022

Social Studies Teachers’ Digital Literacy Levels

Elif Kosdak, Nusret Koca, Mehmet Tamer Kaya

Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.674

Pages: 412-423

Keywords: Digital Literacy, Technology, Social Studies, Social Studies Teacher

Abstract

In this study, which was conducted to determine the digital literacy levels of social studies teachers, explanatory sequential design, which is one of the mixed pattern methods, was used. 543 Social Studies teachers working in secondary schools across Turkey participated in the study in the 2019-2020 academic year. 543 social studies teachers participated in the quantitative part of the study and 32 social studies teachers participated in the qualitative part. The sample of the study was chosen as an easy and accessible sample. The data of the study were collected through the personal information form developed by the researcher, the interview form and the digital literacy scale developed by Sulak, (2019). Quantitative data obtained in the study were analyzed with a statistical program. As a result of the research, it was determined that the digital literacy levels of social studies teachers were at the "I agree" level. Significant differences were found between the digital literacy levels of teachers and the variables of gender, use of technology in the lesson, and in-service training. With the data obtained as a result of the interviews, it was revealed that the teachers themselves have a perception that their digital literacy skill level is below the digital literacy level of today's Z generation. As a result of the findings, suggestions were made to carry out various studies to increase the digital literacy level of social studies teachers and to gain digital literacy skills through in-service/pre-service training.

References

  1. Apay, A & Özbaşı, D. (2008). Investigating Teacher Attitudes Towards Computers. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 55,339-362.

  2. Arslan, S. (2019). Investigation of digital literacy levels of teachers working in primary and secondary schools in terms of various variables. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Sakarya University. Sakarya.

  3. Ay,T.S & Aydoğdu, B. (2016). The views of classroom teachers about parental involvement.  Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences 8(23), 562-590.

  4. Buzkurt, L (2021). Investigation of the Relationship Between Preschool Teachers' Lifelong LearningTendencies and Digital Literacy Levels. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Dicle University, Dicle.

  5. Creswell, J., & Plano C, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  6. Çakmak, Z. & Taşkıran, C. (2014). Examination in terms of various variables of the attitudes of teacher candidates social studies towards computer assisted training. Turkish Studies, 9(5), 529-537.

  7. Çelik, T. (2020). Training teachers of social studies in the digital age: an action study. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 38,211-229. DOI: 10.30794/pausbed.541913.

  8. Çetin, O. (2016). Examining the digital literacy levels of undergraduate science education and pedagogical formation programme preservice teachers. Erzincan University Journal of Educational 18(2), 658-685.

  9. Gür-E. D., Güngören, Ö., Hamutoğlu, N. B., Kaya U. G., Demirtas Tolaman, T. (2019). The Relationship between Lifelong Learning Trends, Digital Literacy Levels and Usage of Web 2.0 Tools with Social Entrepreneurship Characteristics. Croatian Journal of Education: 21(1), 45−76. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i1.2989.

  10. Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2006). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin öğretim materyallerini kullanma düzeyleri: Amasya ili örneği. Atatürk University Bayburt Journal of Educational 1(1), 90-101.

  11. Kaya, B. (2008). The using of technology in the social studies classroom. Gazi University Gazi Journal of Educational, 28(3), 189–205.

  12. Kaya, M. T. (2019). Investigation of technopedagogical education competencies and smart board self-efficacy of social studies teachers: Afyonkarahisar sample. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar.

  13. Kaya, M. T. & Yazıcı, H. (2019). A view of the social studies teachers’ on technopedagogical education competencies, ETU Journal of Social Sciences Institute 9, 105-136.

  14. Kıyıcı, M. (2008). Identifying digital literacy level of teacher’s candidates. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Anadolu University, Eskişehir.

  15. Koca, M. K. (2014). Applicability of fieldwork-based teaching activities to social studies course (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Gazi University. Ankara.

  16. Korkmaz, M. (2020). Determining digital literacy levels of primary school teachers. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Eskişehir Osman Gazi University. Eskişehir.

  17. Malhotra, N.K. (2004). Marketing research an applied orientation, 4. Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

  18. Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the digital society. C. Lankshear, M. Knobel (Ed.), Digital literacies:Concepts, Policies and Practices (s.151- 174). New York: Peter Lang.

  19. Menşan, N.Ö. (2019). Primary school teachers' perception of digital culture. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi University. Eskişehir.

  20. Ministry of National Education. (2018). Social studies curriculum. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812103847686SOSYAL%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0LER%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20.pd (Date of access : 6.11.2020).

  21. Ministry of National Education. (2020). Fatih project. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/about.html. (Date of access: 10.10.2020.)

  22. Öçal, F. N. (2017). Perceptions of digital literacy competence related to primary school teacher and parents themselves with their children (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Gazi University, Ankara

  23. Özer, Ü & Albayrak, Özer, E. (2017). Social studies and computer and ınstructional technologies teac her candidates' views towards web 2.0 in education. 3nd International Congress on Political, Economic and Social Studies (ICPESS), 9-11 Nov. 2017, 106-118.

  24. Savcı, İ (1999). Society gender and technology, Journal of The Faculty of Political Science. 54(1), 123-142.

  25. Selber, S. (2004). Multilitaracies for a dijital age. Corbondale: Southern Ilinoıs University Press.

  26. Sulak, S. E. (2019). Development of the digital literacy scale: validity and reliability study. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(31) 1329-1342.

  27. Şimşek, S. (2016). Social studies teaching for social studies and classroom teachers. Ankara: Anı Publishing

  28. Tatlı, A.2018). Evaluation of teachers' digital citizenship levels in the context of information literacy and internet and computer usage self-sufficiency. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.

  29. Tepe, U. (2019). Opinions of social studies teacher candidates on digital literacy.(Unpublished Master’s thesis). Fırat University. Elazığ.

  30. Yaman, C. (2019). Examination of digital literacy levels of social studies teacher candidates (The example of Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University). (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde.

bottom of page