top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Engineering and Technology Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2622-9374

Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.21 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.06 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.12 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.27 PM.png
open access

Published: 03 May 2023

Importance of Freshwater Biology

Mohammad Haidar Mosavi

Bamyan University, Afghanistan

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 42-49

Keywords: Biology, Climate Change, Endangered Species, Extinction, Fresh Water


Freshwaters have suffered significantly from overfishing, the introduction of foreign species, pollution, flow management, and water extraction as a result of human activity. Many freshwater species' ranges and populations have drastically decreased as a result of these conditions, making them much more susceptible. Freshwater ecologists have been conducting in-depth research on a variety of topics recently, including the status, trends, ecology, and reproduction of endangered species, threats to these species, and the effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystem function, metapopulation dynamics, biodiversity hotspots, and design. The reserve has addressed legal flaws, stakeholder dialogue, and habitat restoration. However, present efforts might not be sufficient to halt the current deluge and imminent extinction of freshwater. We briefly go over four major obstacles to saving freshwater. First, both freshwater species and human usage of freshwater are threatened by climate change. Before natural disasters occur, we must support the thoughtful and sensible planning of technical responses to climate change. We must anticipate ecological and human responses to climate change. Second, since the extinction of freshwater species is already well advanced, freshwater conservationists must now be ready to stop further losses, even if our understanding is still lacking, and to collaborate more successfully with other stakeholders. Third, there is a gap between freshwater ecology and conservation biology that needs to be filled.


  1. Araki, H., Cooper B. and Blouin, M. S. (2007). Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100–103. Google Scholar

  2. Barbour, M. T., Poff,, N. L Norris, R. H, and Allan, J. D. (2008). Perspective: communicating our science to inf2005ence public policy. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:562–569. Google Scholar

  3. Biber, E., (2002). The application of the Endangered Species Act to the protection of freshwater mussels: a case study. Environmental Law 32:91–173. Google Scholar

  4. Brooks, T. M. Mittermeier, R. A. da Fonseca, G. A. B. Gerlach, J. Hoffmann, M. Lamoreux, J. F. Mittermeier, C. G. Pilgrim, J. D and Rodrigues A. S. L.( 2006). Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61. Google Scholar

  5. Bunn, S. E. and Arthington, A. H. (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30:492–507. Google Scholar

  6. Danielopol, D. L. Griebler, C. Gunatilaka, A. and Notenboom, J. (2003). Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environmental Conservation 30:104–130. Google Scholar

  7. Deutsch, C. A. Tewksbury, J. J. Huey, R. B. Sheldon, K. S. Ghalambor, C. K. Haak, D. C and Martin, P. R. (2008). Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:6668–6672. Google Scholar

  8. Fagan, W. F. (2002). Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology 83:3243–3249. Google Scholar

  9. Heino, J. Virkkala, R. and Toivonen, H. (2009). Climate change and freshwater biodiversity: detected patterns, future trends and adaptations in northern regions. Biological Reviews 84:39–54. Google Scholar

  10. Hunter, M. L., and Gibbs, J. P. (2007). Fundamentals of conservation biology. 3rd edition Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts. Google Scholar

  11. Junk, W. J. (2002). Long-term environmental trends and the future of tropical wetlands. Environmental Conservation 29:414–429. Google Scholar

  12. Morell, V. (2008). Into the wild: reintroduced animals face daunting odds. Science 320:742–743. Google Scholar

  13. Palmer, M. Allan, J. D. Meyer, J. and Bernhardt, E. S. (2007). River restoration in the twenty-first century: data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15:472–481. Google Scholar

  14. Richter, B. D., Matthews, R, and Wigington, R. (2003). Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 13:206–224. Google Scholar

  15. Rogers, K. H. (2008). Limnology and the post-normal imperative: an African perspective. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 30:171–185. Google Scholar

  16. Rosenberg, D. M, McCully. P., and Pringle, C. M. (editors). (2000). Global-scale environmental effects of hydrologic alterations. BioScience 50:746–823. Google Scholar

  17. Ruttner, F. (1963). Fundamentals of limnology. English translation of 3rd edition University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario. Google Scholar

  18. Smith, V. H. (2003). Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: a global problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 10:126–139. Google Scholar

  19. Strayer, D. L. (2008). Freshwater mussel ecology: a multifactor approach to distribution and abundance University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

  20. Strayer, D. L. (2006). Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:271–287. Google Scholar

  21. Vaughn, C. C. Spooner, D. E, and Galbraith, H. S. (2007). Context-dependent species identity effects within a functional group of filter-feeding bivalves. Ecology 88:1654–1662. Google Scholar.

bottom of page