top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Engineering and Technology Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2622-9374

Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.21 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.06 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.12 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.27 PM.png
open access

Published: 23 December 2020

OpenFOAM Based Approach for the Prediction of the Dam Break with an Obstacle


Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 91-97

Keywords: Dam Break, An Obstacle, Surface Profile, OpenFOAM


The phenomenon of the flow impact on a vertical wall resulting from a dam problem is simulated by using OpenFOAM. In this simulation, a dam break was also simulated with the addition of obstacles with various dimensions. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of the solver for problems in the impact wave category from the experimental results of previous researchers and other numerical solution techniques compared with the results of this solver. Different aspects of flow such as free surface elevation before and after the initial impact have been observed in depth. The method used in this research is numerical computation simulation with the OpenFOAM approach which has the advantage of being more accurate and fast simulation time. The variations in the dimensions of the obstacle in this study were b / h = 0.25, b / h = 0.5 and b / h = 1.0. From the simulation data, it is found that the numerical approach has been validated through quantitative comparisons with experimental measurements. The computational positions of the leading edge of the collapsed water column match the experimental data. The difference between the experiment and this numerical solution is below 2%.


  1. Biscarini, C., Di Francesco, S. & Manciola, P. 2010. CFD modeling approach for dam break flow studies,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, pp.705-718.

  2. Chen, S., Li, Y., Tian, Z. & Fan, Q. 2019. On dam-break flow routing in confluent channels. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 4384, pp.1-23.

  3. Ferziger, J.H. & Peric, M. 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics, Springer 3rd Ed., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

  4. Hänsch, S., Lucas, D., Höhne, T & Krepper, E. 2014. Application of a new concept for multi-scale interfacial structures to the dam-break case with an obstacle. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 279, pp.171- 181.

  5. Higuera, P. Lara, J.L. & Losada, I.J. 2013. Realistic wave generation and active wave absorption for Navier–Stokes models: Application to OpenFOAM. Coastal Engineering, 71, pp. 102-118.

  6. Issakhov, A. & Imanberdiyeva, M. 2019. Numerical simulation of the movement of water surface of dam break flow by VOF methods for various obstacles. International Journal of Heat and Mass, Vol.136, pp. 1030-1051.

  7. Issakhov, A., Zhandaulet, Y. & Nogaeva, A. 2018. Numerical simulation of dam break flow for various forms of the obstacle by VOF method. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 109, pp. 191-206.

  8. Kocaman, S., Güzel, H., Evangelista, S., Ozmen-Cagatay, H. & Viccione, G. 2020. Experimental and numerical analysis of a dam-break flow through different contraction geometries of the Channel. Water, 12, 1124, pp.1-22.

  9. Oertel, M. & Bung, D.B. 2012. Initial stage of two- dimensional dam-break waves: laboratory versus VOF,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50(1), pp.89-97.

  10. Ozmen-Cagatay, H. & Kocaman, S. 2011. Dam-break flow in the presence of obstacle: experiment and CFD simulation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 5(4), pp. 541-552.

  11. Ryu, Y., Chang, K.A. & Mercier, R. 2007. Application of dam-break flow to green water prediction,” Applied Ocean Research, 29 (3), pp. 128-136.

  12. Verma, D. K., Setia, B & Arora, V. K. (2017). Experimental study of breaching of an earthen dam using a fuse plug model. IJE TRANSACTIONS A: Basics, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.479-485.

  13. Yu, C.H. & Sheu, T.W.H. 2017. Development of a coupled level set and immersed boundary method for predicting dam break flows. Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 221, pp.1-18.

  14. Yu, C.H. Wen, H.L., Gu, Z.H. & An, R. D. 2019. Numerical simulation of dam-break flow impacting a stationary obstacle by a CLSVOF/IB method. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol.79, 104934, pp.1-14.

  15. Zhainakov, A.Z. & Kurbanaliev, A.Y. 2013. Verification of the open package OpenFOAM on dam break problems. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, Vol.20, pp. 451-461.

  16. Zhao, X., Liang, D. & Martinelli, M. 2017. Numerical simulations of dam-break floods with MPM

  17. Procedia Engineering, 175, pp.133 – 140.

bottom of page