Economics and Business
Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)
Published: 09 November 2019
Factors of Cluster Initiatives Management
Wiktor Adamus
Jagiellonian University, Poland
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1992.02.04.160
Pages: 1185-1200
Keywords: European Clusters, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Management, Critical Success Factors
Abstract
The idea of clusters attracts attention of specialists as well as larger public since at least three decades. Presented paper addresses itself to one particularly important aspect of managing clusters: cluster excellence and the ways of achieving it. Despite the on-going debate there are still only a few studies that investigate cluster initiatives performance and management phenomena, identify the success factors underlying cluster initiatives management and compare their influence. The objective of this study was to identify Critical Success Factors of cluster initiatives management. Further development of the field demands constant sophistication of analytical tools and modes of empirical research. There exist a need for selecting and assessing quality of data at researcher’s disposal. It is particularly strongly felt when data come from respondents in social surveys, from participant observation, focus groups sessions, content analysis and so on. Methods listed above always bear some risk of subjectivism and arbitrary decisions of what is good or bad in data we have. AHP method adopted in research which paper is based on offers stronger ways of gathering, selecting and interpreting the validity of data. The proposed Analytic Hierarchy Process framework identified the relative importance of different success factors to cluster initiative management and determined the key areas of activity and management focus. The AHP based interviews conducted among European cluster managers representing 19 cluster initiatives located in 10 countries allowed to identify the following Critical Success Factors: ‘Assuring sustainability of financing’, ‘Development of CI mission, vision, strategy and operational action plan’, ‘Integration building partnerships inside the CI, creation of interpersonal links, social networks, trust’ and ‘Development of cluster’s critical mass and management of partners’ complementarities and interdependencies’. Their joint importance for cluster initiative management success reached 40%, while the remaining 60% was distributed among 16 other factors. The results of this study support more effective management and better organization of cluster development processes. They are specifically tailored for entrepreneurs, willing to initiate or establishing cluster initiatives, as well as managers, responsible for CIs day-to-day operations and other CI stakeholders. They can also be utilized in the political area, as guidance for policy makers in redesigning policies of cluster initiatives support as well as monitoring and evaluation processes, so that they are based on identified CSFs.
References
- Ketels, C., Lindqvist G., Sölvell Ö., 2006, Cluster Initiatives in developing and transition economies, Original edition, Stockholm: Center for Strategy and Competitiveness
- Ketels, C., Memedovic O., 2008, From clusters to cluster-based economic development, International journal of technological learning, innovation and development, 1 (3), p. 375-392
- Klofsten, M., Bienkowska, D., Laur, I., Sölvell, I., Success factors in cluster initiative management. Mapping out the ‘big five’, Industry and Higher Education 02/2015, 29 (1), p. 65-77
- Meier zuKöcker, G., 2009, Success Factors for Sustainable Cluster Management, International Conference on Clusters: Clusters – Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Development Belgrade
- Lindqvist, G., 2009, Disentangling Clusters Agglomeration and Proximity Effects, EFI, The Economic Research Institute Stockholm School of Economics
- Merkl-Rachbauer, A., Reingruber, I., 2012, Impact evaluation of cluster-based policies. A practical guide for evaluation – targeting policy makers and other cluster stakeholders, TACTICS, http://abclusters.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Impact-evaluation-of-cluster-based-policies_0.pdf
- Kaner, S., Lind, L., Toldi, C., Fisk, S., Berger, D., 2007, Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
- PwC, 2011,Report Uncovering excellence in cluster management, http://www.pwc.lu/en/economie-territoires/docs/pwc-uncovering-excellence-in-cluster-management.pdf
- Singh R., 2011, Developing the framework for coordination in supply chain of SMEs, Business Process Management Journal, 17 (4), p. 619-638
- Chen, C., Huang, C., 2004, A multiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan, Information & Management, 41(7), p. 839–851
- Wind Y., Saaty, T., 1980, Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy proces, Management Science, 26, p. 641–658
- Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M., 2005, Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management, Forest Ecology and Management, 207, p. 157-170
- Amighini A. and Rabelloti R., How do Italian Footwear Industrial Districts Face Globalization?, in: European Planning Studies,vol. 14/2006, pp. 485-502
- Largier et al., Clusters Mondiaux. Regards Croises sur la Theorie et la Realite de Clusters, Rapport de l’UARIF, 2008
- Breznitz S. and Anderson W. P., “Boston Metropolitan Area Biotechnology Cluster”, Working Paper Series, Center for Transportation Studies, Boston University, 2004
- Marshall, Principles of Economics, London McMillan 1920