top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Health and Medical Sciences

ISSN 2622-7258

Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.09 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.57 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.52 AM.png
open access

Published: 23 September 2019

The Effect of Antenatal and Intrapartum Factors on Episiotomy Wound Dehiscence

Priyanka S. Deshpande, Harshada S. Thakur, Alka S. Gupta

Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, India

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 386-395

Keywords: Episiotomy, Escherichia Coli, Instrumental Deliveries, Obesity, Anaemia, Peripartum Infection, Surgical Site Infections, Wound Dehiscence


Episiotomy is the most common labour ward procedure in obstetrics. Improper healing of the episiotomy wound can lead to prolonged and sometimes serious post-partum morbidity. Also, if infected, they may manifest as a surgical site infection and may lead to generalised sepsis. In this study, we aim to critically evaluate cases of episiotomy wound gapes and study antenatal, intrapartum, and infective causes for the same. This study aimed to study the prevalence and causes of episiotomy wound dehiscence and the maternal co-morbidities associated with them in a tertiary care centre. Methods: This observational, hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital from 2017-2018. A total of 30 cases of episiotomy wound dehiscence were studied. The rate of episiotomy wound dehiscence was 2.14% for the year 2017-2018. More than half (60%) of the patients have a wound dehiscence were overweight or obese. Anaemia, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism were the main antenatal high-risk factors identified. In the intrapartum factors, wound dehiscence was more common in patients in whom labour was induced and those undergoing instrumental delivery. 70% of the cases were diagnosed between post-partum day 7-14, and the main presenting complaint was pain at the episiotomy site. The main organisms noted in infected wounds were Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae. In conclusion, episiotomy wound dehiscence is an important cause of post-partum morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. This study revisits the need to correct antenatal factors like obesity, anaemia, and hypothyroidism and highlights the need to refine intrapartum practices and post-natal follow up in patients at high risk for this condition.


  1. Dimitrov A, Tsenov D, Ganeva G . 2000. Causes for healing complications in episiotomy. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia Journal (Sofi ia) 40: 17 – 20.
  2. Ekmektzoglou KA, Zografos GC. A concomitant review of the effects of diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism in wound healing. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(17): 2721-2729.
  3. Fitzpatrick M, O’Herlihy C.Postpartum care of the perineum. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist.2007; 9:164-170.
  4. Ganapathy R, Bardis NS, Lamont RF. Secondary repair of the perineum following childbirth. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore).2008 Jan 2;28(6):608–13. Available from:
  5. Goldaber KG, Wendel PJ, McIntire DD, Wendel GD. Postpartum perineal morbidity after fourth-degree perineal repair. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 168: 489 – 493
  6. Gün İ, Doğan B, Özdamar Ö. Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;13(3):144–148. doi:10.4274/tjod.00087
  7. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, et al. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992; A modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infection Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992; 13 606-608.
  8. Hussein J, Walker L. Chapter 8 Puerperal sepsis in low- and middle-income settings: past, present and future. Maternal and Infant Deaths: Chasing Millennium Development Goals 4 & 5. London: RCOG Press, 2010:131–47.
  9. Kamel A, Khalid M. Episiotomy and obstetric perineal wound dehiscence: Beyond soreness. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014; 34: 215–217. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2013.866080.
  10. Kingsbury B, Rathore S, Chelliah H, Londhe V, Benjamin SJ, Mathews J. Risk Factors for Peripartum Wound Dehiscence. Journal of Diagnostic and Clinical Research 2018, Nov, Vol. No-12(11): QC 08-QC11.
  11. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC editors. Infammation and repair. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic basis of disease.9th ed. Canada: Elsevier Saunders 2015. pp.106.
  12. Lewis G, ed. 2007. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers ' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2003 – 2005. The Seventh Report of Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH. Tsenov D, Ganeva
  13. Lynch CM, Pinelli DM, Cruse CW, Spellacy WN, et al. Maternal death from postpartum necrotizing fasciitis arising in an episiotomy: a case report. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1997;5(5):341–4. Available from:
  14. Natori J, Shimizu K, Nagahama M, Tanaka S. The influence of hypothyroidism on wound healing. An experimental study. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi. 1999 June;66(3):176–80.
  15. Ob-Gyns Can Prevent and Manage Obstetric Lacerations During Vaginal Delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin. June 22, 2016. Available from:
  16. Puerperal Complications. In Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. editors. Williams Obstetrics.24th ed. United States of America: MC Graw Hill Education 2010. pp.689-690.
  17. Ramin SM, Ramus RM, Little BB, Gilstrap LC 3rd. 1992. Early repair of episiotomy dehiscence associated with infection. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 167: 1104 – 1107.
  18. Reynolds JL, Yudkin PL. Changes in the management of labour: 2. Perineal management. Can Med Assoc J. 1987;136:1045–9.
  19. Robinson HE, O ' Connell CM, Joseph KS, McLeod NL. 2005. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal 106: 1357 – 1364
  20. Rotas M, McCalla S, Liu C, Minkoff H. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Necrotizing Pneumonia Arising From an Infected Episiotomy Site. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2007 Feb;109(Supplement):533–6. Available from:
  21. Singh S, Thakur T, Chandhiok N, Dhillon BS. Pattern of episiotomy use & its immediate complications among vaginal deliveries in 18 tertiary care hospitals in India. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143(4):474–480. doi:10.4103/0971-5916.184304
  22. Snyder RR, Hammond TL, Hankins GD. Human papillomavirus associated with poor healing of episiotomy repairs. Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal 76: 664– 667.
  23. Spiliotis J, Tsiveriotis K, Datsis AD, Vaxevanidou A, et al. Wound dehiscence: is still a problem in the 21th century: a retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg. 2009;4:12. Published 2009 Apr 3. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-4-12
  24. WHO recommendation on episiotomy policy, 17 February 2018. Available from:
  25. Williams MK, Chames MC. Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery.Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 September;195(3):755–9. Available from:
  26. Winkler KP, n.d. Factors that interfere with wound healing in animals. Factors that interfere with wound healing in animals. Merck Manual, Veterinary Manual. Available from:
  27. Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, et al. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(5):837–841. doi:10.3201/eid0705.010511
bottom of page