top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 28 January 2025

Nine is Not Prime: Court Size as Both Weaponization and Solution for Supreme Court Political Polarization, Inefficiency and Bias

Mykaela L. Chang

Head-Royce School

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.08.01.546

Pages: 66-74

Keywords: Court Size, Weaponization, Supreme Court, Political Polarization

Abstract

Since the creation of the judicial branch, the nation’s highest court has displayed vulnerabilities to politicization, biases and inefficiency. More specifically, the number of justices on the Supreme Court is a culprit in exacerbating these challenges. The Supreme Court has fluctuated its size six times, excluding unsuccessful attempts to change it, with the number of justices as low as five and as high as ten. Though the 155-year stasis in the number of Supreme Court justices has provided relative stability, the history of the institution reveals that previous and current sizes of the Supreme Court leave it vulnerable to not only political polarity and gender biases, but also inefficacy in hearing an adequate number of cases presented to the Court. The paper argues that while the size of the High Court has been a hurdle, it can also be a solution to ensure an independent, fair and productive government branch as the Founders intended.

References

  1. Anonymous Supreme Court Scholar, interview by Mykaela Chang, “Personal Interview (March 14, 2022),” 2022.

  2. Borensen, Tessa, "Neil Gorsuch Confirmed: How His Nomination Changed Politics," Time Magazine, April 7, 2017, https://time.com/4730746/neil-gorsuch-confirmed-supreme-court-year/.Accessed Feb 17, 2022.

  3. Bowman, Cynthia Grant, "Women in the Legal Profession from the 1920s to the 1970s: What Can We Learn From Their Experience About Law and Social Change?" Maine Law Review 61 (2009): 1-8, ISSN: 0025-0651

  4. Cameron, Charles M, Jefferey A. Segal, and Songer Donald, "Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decisions," American Political Science Review 91, no.1 (Spring 2000): 100-116, https://doi.org/10.2307/2586383

  5. Chowdhury, Maureen, Lee, Ji Min, Wagner, Meg, and Macaya, Melissa, "April 7, 2022 Ketanji Brown Jackson Senate Confirmation Vote," CNN, Cable News Network, April 2022. https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ketanji-brown-jackson-senate-confirmation-vote/index.html, Accessed December 5, 2022.

  6. Davis, Aaron C., and Spencer S. Hsu, "The Child Pornography Case at the Center of Ketanji Brown Jackson's Hearing," The Washington Post, March 24, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/03/24/hawkins-brown-jackson-pornography-sentence/.  Accessed Jan 18, 2023.

  7. Dwyer, Colin, "A Brief History of Anthony Kennedy's Swing Vote - and the Landmark Cases It Swayed," NPR, June 27, 2022, https://www.npr.org/2018/06/27/623943443/a-brief-history-of-anthony-kennedys-swing-vote-and-the-landmark-cases-it-swayed. Accessed Jan 18, 2023.

  8. El-Bawab, Nadine, “How did the Supreme Court become so polarized?” ABC News, October 5, 2022, https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-polarized/story?id=90598910, Accessed Jan. 30, 2024.

  9. Elving, Ron, "What Happened with Merrick Garland in 2016 and Why It Matters Now,” NPR, June 29, 2018, https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now., Accessed June 28, 2022.

  10. Epps, Daniel, and Ganesh Sitaraman, "How to save the Supreme Court," Yale Law Journal 129, no. 1 (2019): 148-206, https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/1129.

  11. "Gallup/Knight Poll: Americans' Concerns about Media Bias Deepen, Even as They See It as Vital for Democracy," Knight Foundation, n.d. https://knightfoundation.org/press/releases/gallup-knight-poll-americans-concerns-about-media-bias-deepen-even-as-they-see-it-as-vital-for-democracy/., Accessed June 28, 2022.

  12. Georgetown Law Library, "Supreme Court Nominations Research Guide: Nomination & Confirmation Process," Georgetown Law Library, n.d. https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.php?g=365722&p=2471070, Accessed March 21, 2022.

  13. Greenhouse, Linda, "Senate, 97 to 0, Confirms Kennedy to High Court," The New York Times, Feb 4, 1998, https://www.nytimes.com/1988/02/04/us/senate-97-to-0-confirms-kennedy-to-high-court.html, Accessed April 13, 2022.

  14. Gross, Terry, and David A. Kaplan, "Is the Supreme Court the 'Most Dangerous Branch' of Government?" NPR, Oct 31, 2018, https://www.npr.org/2018/10/31/662482211/is-the-supreme-court-the-most-dangerous-branch-of-government., Accessed April 28, 2022.

  15. Hakim, Danny, et al, "Texts Show Ginni Thomas's Embrace of Conspiracy Theories," The New York Times, March 26 2022, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/us/politics/ginni-thomas-donald-trump.html., Accessed Jan 17, 2024.

  16. Hassan, Adeel, “What to Know About the Mississippi Abortion Law Challenging Roe v. Wade,” The New York Times, May 6, 2022, https://www.nytimes.com/article/mississippi-abortion-law.html, Accessed Dec 23, 2023.

  17. Legal Information Institute, "Judiciary Act of 1789," Cornell Law Legal Information Institute, n.d, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/judiciary_act_of_1789, Accessed Dec 19, 2023.

  18. Jacobi, Tonja, and Matthew Sag, "The Supreme Court Needs 15 Justices," Bloomberg Law, March 4, 2021, news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/the-supreme-court-needs-15-justices.Accessed Jan 12, 2024.

  19. Jacobsen, John Gregory. “Jackson's judges: Six appointments who shaped a nation,” PhD. diss., The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2004. Accessed Feb 15, 2022.

  20. Jenkins, Cameron, "Women's March Pushes for Impeachment of Justice Thomas over Wife's Texts," The Hill. March 14, 2022. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/599762-womens-march-pushes-for-impeachment-of-justice-thomas-amid-wifes-texts?rl=1.Accessed March 19, 2022.

  21. "Judiciary Act of 1801 (Adams’ “Midnight” judges and Judicial Review)," Statutes and Stories, Jan 7, 2018, https://www.statutesandstories.com/blog_html/judiciary-act-of-1801-adams-midnight-judges-and-judicial-review/, Accessed Nov 23, 2023.

  22. Lewis, Jone Johnson, "Myra Bradwell Biography," Thought Co, November 25, 2019, https://www.thoughtco.com/myra-bradwell-profile-3529475, Accessed May 6, 2023.

  23. Mendoza, Diego, "Who voted against Roe v. Wade?" King 5, June 24, 2022, https://www.king5.com/article/news/nation-world/how-justices-ruled-on-dobbs/507-2d25d6ef-6222-4664-baac-8d539ea35866, Accessed May 12, 2023.

  24. National Constitution Center, "How FDR Lost His Brief War on the Supreme Court," National Constitution Center, Feb 25, 2022, https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/how-fdr-lost-his-brief-war-on-the-supreme-court-2. Accessed March 8, 2022.

  25. O'Connor, Sandra Day, Interview, “Trends in the Relationship Between the Federal and State Courts from the Perspective of a State Court Judge,” Sandra Day O’Connor Institute, June 1981, https://oconnorlibrary.org/speeches-writings, Accessed April 19, 2023.

  26. Roos, Dave, "Why Do 9 Justices Serve on the Supreme Court?", History. Sep 27, 2023, www.history.com/news/supreme-court-justices-number-constitution. Accessed January 4, 2024.

  27. Russell, Jacob Hale, "The Supreme Court Doesn't Need 9 Justices. It Needs 27.", Time Magazine, July 16, 2018, time.com/5338689/supreme-court-packing/. Accessed January 18, 2024.

  28. Sara C. Benesh, et. al, "Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.", The Journal of Politics64 no. 2 (2002): 534-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00138

  29. Singh, Kanishka, "U.S. Population Grew at Record Low Rate in 2021, in Part Due to Covid-19." Reuters, Thomson Reuters, Dec 2021. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-population-grew-record-low-rate-2021-part-due-covid-19-2021-12-21/.Accessed December 3, 2023

  30. Supreme Court of the United States, "Justices 1789 to Present.", Supreme Court of the United States. n.d. www.supremecourt.gov/about/members_text.aspx. Accessed May 15, 2022.

  31. The Supreme Court of the United States, "The Court and Its Procedures.", Home - Supreme Court of the United States, n.d, https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/procedures.aspx, Accessed March 29, 2023.

  32. Thomson-DeVeaux, Amelia and Bronner, Laura, “The Supreme Court’s Divide Hasn’t Been this Sharp in Generations”, FiveThirtyEight, ABC News, July 5, 2022, https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-supreme-courts-partisan-divide-hasnt-been-this-sharp-in-generations/, Accessed January 31, 2024.

  33. Toobin, Jeffrey. The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. Anchor Books, 2008.

  34. Totenberg, Nina, "Supreme Court guts affirmative action, effectively ending race-conscious admissions." NPR, June 29, 2023, https://www.npr.org/2023/06/29/1181138066/affirmative-action-supreme-court-decision, Accessed November 6, 2023.

  35. Wheeler, Russell, "Should We Restructure the Supreme Court?", Brookings Institution, March 2, 2020, www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/should-we-restructure-the-supreme-court/. Accessed May 1, 2022.

bottom of page