top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 14 September 2023

Out-of-School Youth Civic Engagement in the Microcosm of Society

Buddy M. Castillo, Vien Rovic E. Sierra, Joanabeth P. Tamondong, Casandra M. Siganay

Saint Louis University, Philippines

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.06.03.439

Pages: 217-231

Keywords: Youth Sector, Out-of-School Youth, Civic Engagement, Digital Civic Engagement, Barangay

Abstract

The youth sector is at the heart of society; they can inspire social change. Out-of-school youth leads the global crisis of declining youth engagement. Past investigations linked the problem to apathy and that the out-of-school youth is an underserved sector without the means to activate their agency effectively. The advent of the 4th Industrial Revolution put in place new platforms where typologies of civic engagement are carried out, and there are external and internal factors that influence these. As the barangay reflects the larger Philippine society, this study examined the typologies of civic engagement that Filipino out-of-school youth participate in both in the traditional and non-traditional settings, the factors that influence their civic engagement participation, and their perceived significance of civic engagement. The study operated on a mixed-method design, which combined quantitative and qualitative research design elements to answer the research questions. The findings show that the modern youth manifested their intense participation in diverse social activities through digital civic engagement; they value civic engagement; they have a comprehensive understanding of what is happening around them; and they are conscious of their role and willing to do what they can to enrich their communities. To enhance the brewing potentials of their transformative character, existing public and private institutional mechanisms, programs, and networks must be strengthened and/or new ones created and explored geared towards fostering a more inclusive and healthy development of the out-of-school youth. The future promise of any nation can be directly measured by the present prospects of its youth.

References

  1. Abdulllah, N. H., Hassan, I., Ahmad, M. F. b., Hassan, N. A., & Ismail, M. M. (2021). Social Media, Youths and Political Participation in Malaysia: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(4), 845-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i4/9578

  2. Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What Do We Mean By “Civic Engagement”? Journal of TransformativeEducation, 3(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605276792

  3. Adorable, V. H. (1979). THE BARANGAY AND CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION FOR DEVELOPMENT. Philippine Political Science Journal, 6(9), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.1979.9754036

  4. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2001, April). Habits from Home, Lessons from School: Influences on Youth Civic Engagement. Political Science & Politics, 36(2), 275-280.

  5. Aspiras, L., & Aspiras, E. D. (2021). Youth Off-Script: Unleashing the Life Stories and Hopes of the Out-of School-Youths. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(1), 222-242. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/10913

  6. Brabant, M., & Braid, D. (2009). The Devil is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 13(2), 59-87. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ905397.pdf

  7. Brady, B., Chaskin, R. J., & McGregor, C. (2020). Promoting civic and political engagement among marginalized urban youth in three cities: Strategies and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105184

  8. Burkhard, B. M., Robinson, K. M., Murray, E. D., & Lerner, R. M. (2020, January 13). Positive Youth Development: Theory and Perspective (S. Hugo & J. D. Jewell, Eds.). The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad310

  9. Cabo, W. L. (2018, May 11). Youth and Political Participation in the Philippines: Voices and Themes from a Democracy Project. Journal of Politics and Governance, 8(1), 259-271. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jopag/article/view/123298

  10. Campbell, D. E. (2006, March). What is education’s impact on civic and social engagement? In MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF EDUCATION ON HEALTH AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE COPENHAGEN SYMPOSIUM [Presentation]. OECD. Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/37425694.pdf

  11. Cho, A., & Pelter, Z. (2020, March). Digital civic engagement by young people[Rapid analysis | An overview of the latest research with a critical focus on the enablers, constraints and nature of youth civic engagement in the digital space]. UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy. Retrieved April 2, 2022, from https://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/reports/digital-civic-engagement-young-people

  12. Cross, W. E. (2016). The psychology of nigrescence: Revising the Cross model. In J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, C. M. Alexander, & M. A. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of Multicultural Counseling (4th ed., pp. 93-122). SAGE Publications, Inc.

  13. Cruz, C., Labone, J., & Querubin, P. (2020, May). Social Network Structures and the Politics of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from the Philippines. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000789

  14. Damon, W. (2009). The Path to Purpose: How Young People Find Their Calling in Life. Simon and Schuster.

  15. Duncan, L. E. (2010, October 12). Using Group Consciousness Theories to Understand Political Activism: Case Studies of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Ingo Hasselbach. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1601-1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00664.x

  16. Edgerton, R. K. (1971). Joseph Ralston Hayden: The Education of a Colonialist. In N. G. Owen (Ed.), Compadre Colonialism: Studies in the Philippines under American Rule (pp. 195-226). University of Michigan Press.

  17. Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283-300. PhilPapers. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1

  18. Erkulwater, J. L. (2012). Political Participation over the Life Cycle. In K. L. Schlozman, S. Verba, & H. E. Brady (Eds.), The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy (pp. 199-231). Princeton University Press.

  19. Faulkner, W. N., Nkwake, A., Wallance, N., & Bonifaz, A. (2020, September 1). Using social network analysis to explore community engagement for out-of-school youth (OSY) in the Mindanao region of the Philippines. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2019-0126

  20. Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008, September 1). Developing Citizens: The Impact of Civic Learning Opportunities on Students’ Commitment to Civic Participation. American Educational Research, 45(3), 738-766. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316951

  21. Kirby, E. H., Marcelo, K. B., & Kawashima-Ginsberg, K. (2009). Volunteering and college experience. Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.

  22. Kuperminc, G. P., Blatt, S. J., Shahar, G., Henrich, C., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2004, February). Cultural Equivalence and Cultural Variance in Longitudinal Associations of Young Adolescent Self-Definition and Interpersonal Relatedness to Psychological and School Adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, (33), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027378129042

  23. Labor, J. S. (2018, August 23). Role of Art Education in Peace Building Efforts among Out-of-School Youth affected by Armed Conflict in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Journal of International Development, 30(7), 1186-1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3392

  24. Lanuza, G. (2015, February). Reactivating Filipino Youth Activism in the Age of Slacktivism (P. F. Campos, Ed.).  Plaridel, 11(1), 97-122. http://www.plarideljournal.org/article/reactivating-filipino-youth-activism-in-the-  age-of-slacktivism/

  25. Lavrakas, P. J. (Ed.). (2008). Questionnaire. In Encyclopedia of survey research methods       (Vol. 1-0). [Encyclopedia]. SAGE Research Methods. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n424

  26. Lay, J. C., Gimpel, J. G., & Schuknecht, J. E. (2003). Cultivating Democracy: Civic Environments and Political Socialization in America. Brookings Institution Press.

  27. Leano, R. (2019). Artist as Citizen: Transnational Cultural Work in the National Democratic Movement of the Philippines. In Filipino American Transnational Activism (Vol. 1, pp. 121-145). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414556_006

  28. Lee, N.-J., Shah, D. V., & McLeod, J. M. (2012). Processes of Political Socialization: A Communication Mediation Approach to Youth Civic Engagement. Communication Research, 40(5), 669-697. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212436712

  29. Lenzi, M., Rossi, G., Santinello, M., Sharkey, J., & Vieno, A. (2016, October 19). Factors Associated with Civic Engagement in Adolescence: The Effects of Neighborhood, School, Family and Peer Contexts. Retrieved from Wiley Online Library: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcop.21826

  30. Malafaia, C., Nieves, T., & Menezes, I. (2021, February 19). The Gap Between Youth and Politics: Youngsters Outside the Regular School System Assessing the Conditions for Be(com)ing Political Subjects. YOUNG, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308820987996

  31. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2019). 2019 Annual Poverty Indicators survey https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/2019%2520APIS_signed.pdf

  32. Philippine Statistics Authority (2015). Out-of-School Children and Youth in the Philippines (Results from the 2013 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey). https://psa.gov.ph/content/out-school-children-and-youth-philippines-results-2013-functional-literacy-education-and

  33. Pontes, A. I., Henn, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Youth political (dis)engagement and the need for citizenship education: Encouraging young people’s civic and political participation through the curriculum. Education, Citizenship, and Social Justice, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917734542

  34. Ponto, J. (2015, March 1). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practicioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171. PubMed Central. Retrieved April 12, 2022, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/#:~:text=Survey%20research%20is%20defined%20as,utilize%20various%20methods%20of%20instrumentation

  35. Republic Act 8044. (n.d.). National Youth Commission - THE VOICE AND ADVOCATE OF THE YOUTH. Retrieved April 11, 2022, from https://nyc.gov.ph/republic-act-8044/

  36. Roberts, K., Duggan, J., & Noble, M. (n.d.). Out-of-school youth in high-unemployment areas: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069888208258034

  37. Salamon, S. (2003). From Hometown to Nontown: Rural Community Effects of Suburbanization. Rural Sociology, 68(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00126.x

  38. Samonte, Q. S. (1970, December). Student Activism and National Development: The Philippine Setting. The Journal of Educational Thought, 4(3), 161-173. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23768353

  39. Sears, A. M., & Hyslop-Margison, E. J. (2007, Spring). Crisis as a Vehicle for Educational Reform: The Case of Citizenship Education. The Journal of Educational Thought, 41(1), 43-62. JSTOR. Retrieved April 2, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23767250

  40. Smith, C. W. (2017, January 11). Youth and Generational Differences in US Politics. Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0203

  41. Sta. Maria, M., & Diestro, Jr., J. M. (2009). The youth speak: Forms, facilitators and obstacles to their political participation. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 291-313. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc archives/Philippine%20Journal%20of%20Psychology/2009/Num%202/10_The%20Youth%20Speak_%20Forms%20Facilitators%20and%20Obstacles%20to%20their%20Political%20Participation.pdf

  42. Tedin, K. L. (1980, February 1). Assessing Peer and Parent Influence on Adolescent Political Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 24(1), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110929

  43. UNESCO Institute of Statistics (2021). Out-of-school children and Youth.  https://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/out-school-children-and-youth

  44. United Nations. (2019). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) | Department of  Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations.  https://sdgs.un.org/un-system-sdg-implementation/united- nations-office-drugs-and-crime-unodc-44139

  45. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015). Youth population trends and sustainable  development. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/popfacts/PopFacts_201 5-1.pdf

  46. United Nations Security Council. (2015, December 9). Security Council, Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2250 (2015), Urges Member States to Increase Representation of Youth in Decision-Making at All Levels [Press Release]. https://www.un.org/press/en/2015/sc12149.doc.htm

  47. United Nations Security Council. (2018, June 6). Adopting Resolution 2419 (2018), Security Council Calls for Increasing Role of Youth in Negotiating, Implementing Peace Agreements [Press Release]. https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/sc13368.doc.htm

  48. United Nations Security Council. (2020, July 14). Security Council Underlines Vital Role of Youth in Building Peace, Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2535 (2020)[Press Release]. https://www.un.org/press/en/2020/sc14251.doc.htm

  49. Velasco, D. (2005). Rejecting ‘Old-Style’ Politics?: Youth Participation in the Philippines. In Go! Young Progressives in Southeast Asia (pp. 79-112). http://library.fes.de/pdf- files/bueros/philippinen/04526/countrypapers_philippines.pdf

  50. Vogt, W. P. (Ed.). (2005). Weighted Average (or Mean). In Dictionary of statistics & methodology (3rd ed.) [Dictionary]. SAGE Research Methods. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983907.n2080

  51. Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A., & Jaafar, N. I. (2014, April). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291-301. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007

  52. Zyad, H. (2021, October 19). An exploration of the effects of social media on youth online and offline sociopolitical engagement. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211048676

bottom of page