top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2827-9735

Judge Gavel
 Scales of Justice
City Crowds
People in Library
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 04 June 2026

The Current State of Multifaceted Inflammatory Problems in Bangladesh is an Extreme Obstacle to the Basic Development of Social and Human Rights

Md Hazrat Ali

Interdisciplinary Institute for Food Security, Bangladesh

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1996.05.02.175

Pages: 60-74

Keywords: Multi-Class Problems, Depletion Syndrome, Dishonesty, Selfishness, Discrepancy Rates, Deprivation

Abstract

In this study, various ongoing social multifaceted problems and tragic degradation, such as immorality, dishonesty, disunity, injustice, inequality, deprivation, food insecurity, lack of mutual perfect cooperation, etc., have been reported. The multifaceted problems that are undermining the potential for rapid development, the structure of human rights, humanity, human existence, fundamental rights, etc. Social cohesive proper development, rural infrastructural and enterprising activities, diversified farming and production systems, and food security are being severely affected. In a word, unwanted and reckless dishonesty, selfishness, etc., are endangering human life and human rights as a whole. As a result, the victims have to live on very low quality, deprived of equal human rights, and extremely poor and malnourished. The research article has been designed on the basis of hypothetical concepts, ideas, and experience in the context of naturally obtained tragic situations, events, acute problems, and phenomena from the natural environment, using a convenience and non-participant close observation method. Due to limitations, performing a perfect research study to determine the actual dimensions of acute problems has not been possible. So, in the context of acuteness of multifaceted problems and limitations and for the purpose of providing comprehensive solutions to multifaceted problems and protecting human rights, there is an urgent need to investigate, intervene, and perform a deep study with participant method to find out methods of problems from the perspective of indirect purpose.

 

1. Introduction

 

To this society, an extreme false status of honesty, values, truth, and empathy is shown in faces, and in fact, the use of acute falseness, immorality, violation, etc., is taken for illegal privilege that causes serious depletion of human rights and social structure in human life (Barber, 2019) (Mazar, 2008) (A, 2015). For a minimal good society and citizen life, there is no alternative to establishing honesty, truthiness, education, honest activities, social values, and cooperation (Rahman, 2018). But prevailing dishonesty, cheating, injustice, ugly discrimination, etc., in society inhibit and destroy social development (LEWIS, 2015) (Bhugra, 2016).

 

Dishonesty was originally liable for the entire depletion of the development of society and human beings. Dishonesty includes falseness, fraud, selfishness, conscienceless mentality, irresponsibility, negligence, discrimination, deprivation, etc. (Rahman, 2018; Nicole L. Mead; Wikham, 2014). Untruth and fraud are a big social problem that can completely destroy someone's self-esteem, leading to conscienceless and inhuman activities (LEWIS, 2015) (Nicole L. Mead). The use of unlimited extreme falseness and immorality threatens social honor and generally erodes trust in society. A little circumference of dishonesty or lie or immorality begets a large circumference of dishonesty or immorality or lie.

 

There is now prevailing discrimination of opportunities, social rights, basic rights, and deprivation of honest advice, honest behavior, and negligence of mutual cooperation, developing enterprise, etc. in society (Hasle, 2004) (Rahman K. F., 2019) (Wikham, 2014). Those are causes of depletion of general and versatile knowledge, experience, skill, and production in social and human beings’ development (Rai, 2011). Selfishness discourages a sense of sociality and responsibility. Discrimination, injustice, deprivation, negligence, etc., are forcing human rights, developing work and productivity.

 

Dishonesty severely damages/depletes human rights, morals, equity, social network, unity, and social and rural development (Roma Khanna, 2020; Riti, 2018; Hopper, 2011). It begets poverty, food insecurity, production regression, and malnutrition. In a word, unlimited dishonest activities are causing various problems constantly in society. For lack of truth and honesty, those kinds of problems and crimes constantly regenerating are as follows:

 

2. Reckless Dishonesty, False Identification for Illegal Privilege

 

For the purpose of achieving illegal privilege, or failing to attain any fixed aim, the accurate information of personal citizen identity is hidden. There is common fraudulent information about citizen identity in accordance with domestic gradual steps. As like junior is senior, senior is junior, being duplicated from old age to young age, etc. (Tosam, 2015) (Wasserstrom) (Nicole L. Mead). That creates gradually very negative plays on the general/normal stream of society and greatly affects honesty, values, human rights, morality, and an entirely hazardous situation is being created, which is increasing all the problems in society (Rai, 2011) (Roma Khanna, 2020) (A, 2015). Just as the tiny grains of sand, the droplets of water form the continent and the deep ocean, just as the small dishonesty of everyone can lead the society to great degradation, on the other hand, the small honesty of everyone can lead the society to great progress. Falseness is a large criterion for harming and a falseness of odd circumstances has grasped morality, honesty, truthiness, and conscience of society, and it has been compromised with very normality by society. For that reason, equity, human rights, basic values of life, honesty, etc., have been removed from the normal sense of society people (Kamruzzaman, 2016) (Riti, 2018). Extreme deprivation, desperation, etc., have mixed with daily usual matters among the mentality of society people and turned into taking to task matters (LEWIS, 2015) (Bhugra, 2016).

 

Extreme falseness satisfies/develops the selfish aim of very few persons, but it declines most and depletes basic social structure and human rights and basic rights, damages ideals of life, leading life, honesty, morality, violates the law, and enforces worth expectation in society.

 

Here, falseness has grasped the depth sphere of society and reached a concerning worst situation. For society, many actual ways of development and potential development are covered by falseness. Falseness has been turned into a competitive way of attaining selfishness. Falseness/ extreme falseness is a crime,4 hateful dishonesty, shelter of falseness in society is strictly prohibited (Mazar, 2008) (Barber, 2019). Falseness/open falseness is a deeper depletion of social structure, development, and human rights.

 

2.1. Method

 

For using a general purpose, a person's identical documents are noticed in an unmatched background. Questioning about that, it is confirmed that the counterfeit identity is for gaining illegal privilege for the present or the future. In that context, of ensuring the status of extreme falseness, some questionnaires and answers are applied to some targeted persons by an indirect convenience non-participant close observation method (Cooper, 2004) (Smith, 1998) (Kumar, 2022). Hiding the actual purpose, the following questions are alike: 1. How old are you? 2. How many children do you have? 3. What is the cause of your discrepancy of identity in accordance with your family background? 4. What is the purpose of being very near the equal/ same age as your child? 5. How do you feel about this kind of acute falseness? 6. What privileges have you gained by this kind of acute falseness? 7. Your age identification does not match your current background. What is the purpose of making yourself willingly of your convenience identification from your actual identity? 8. How much have you privileged yourself in life with your convenience, cheated identification? 9. How much importance does it have in false/ wrongdoing? 10. What do you consider the falseness in the field of morality or honesty? 11. How does society recognize it? 12. You have earned a higher education degree, are worthy, have skill and experience, are honest, and work hard, so what are the causes behind your deprivation of right, honor, occupation, and remuneration? When they were asked, the answers were positive. Analyzing the positive answers to the above questions ensures that acute falseness is prevailing in a hated situation (Etikan, 2016; Simkus, 2022).

 

By convenience, non-participation, close observation, questionnaire and in various context hypothetically (Herskovits) (Pachani, 2019) 33 families out of 50 have been identified as having a discrepancy background among families members or false-aged counterfeit identities (Figure 1.1 & 1.2) that is escalation for values, conscience, law, human rights, honesty and justice (Nassaji, 2015) (Cooper, 2004). Where among the discrepancy identities, there is someone organized privileged with discrepancy and counterfeit identity (Tosam, 2015) (Ashforth, 2003) (KRISTIANSEN, 2006). And on the other side, there is someone deprived of organized privileges in spite of having a fair identity, even if with high qualifications (Bhugra, 2016) (Hasle, 2004) (Wikham, 2014).

 

Figure 1.1: Comparison of family quantities and percentages based on discrepancy background (1)


Figure: 1.2: Comparison of family quantities and percentages based on discrepancy background (2)

 

FDB= The families with discrepancy back grounded.

FWDB= The families without discrepancy back grounded.

TF= Total Families.

 

So, it is normal for people, how will they lead with truthiness if there exists falseness among them commonly; how will they avoid immorality if there exists immorality commonly among them? How will they be obedient to the law if there exist unlawful activities (Wasserstrom)? How will they be mutually cooperative for social development, human rights, and equity if there exists extreme selfishness (Hasle, 2004) (Hopper, 2011). Besides, what will be the benefit of taking adventure for social development activities if there exists an open way of depletion (A, 2015) (Rahman M. M., 2018) (Nicole L. Mead).

 

3. Negligence of multifaceted production and versatile cultivation of agriculture in arable sources

 

Many people have food and nutrition insecurity in Bangladesh (Katherine Alaimo, 2020; Raihan M. J., 2018). Bangladesh is a poor country, and its food security is not stable (Havas, 2011). So not even a simple amount of space of its agricultural land or arable sources should be left uncultivated (Thompson, 2007; Ferdousi, 2013). But what is shocking is that due to unawareness, neglect, etc., much of its arable land remains uncultivated, where urgent diversified agriculture and production needs to be created in the interest of security and stability (Faroque, 2011; Ahmed, 2011). If there were no jealous, strife, distrust of one another, petty selfishness and deceit, and if honestly everyone was aware and respectful of each other‟s right, a pure unity would be formed among them (Hopper, 2011). Where the perfect self-sufficiency of agriculture depends on unity, in the absence of selfless unity, conventional production in agriculture is difficult and disrupted, where the idea of integrated and diversified agricultural production is far from the idea (Ahmed, 2011; Hopper, 2011).

 

The farmers cannot be harmonious for versatile agriculture production due to dishonesty and false dignity (Hopper, 2011). Hence, the agricultural revolution is being restricted by non–cooperation, immorality, and mutual jealousy (A, 2015).

 

It is usually noticeable among some unconscious society people who are middle well to keep unused their fertile land without agricultural productivity with negligence that includes discouragement of proper self- sufficient agricultural progress and disrupts sustainable agriculture production and food security (Ferdousi, 2013) (Nishat).

 

There are many people in society who are indifferent to their duties. If one is compelled or seeks to fulfilling one‟s own responsibilities, he is hindered by people‟s praise of indifferent people. That attitude has a profound effect on social development and infrastructure. And there are many people in the society with limited knowledge who associate performing their own work with their own involvement with7 unjust. The thought of this growing immoral inequality is an extreme obstacle to social development and the development of human livelihood (Mazar, 2008; Nicole L. Mead).

 

3.1. Method

 

For ensuringNegligence of multifaceted production and versatile cultivation of agriculture in arable sources', the following questionnaire by convenience non-participation method, similar to (Cooper, 2004), (Etikan, 2016), (Kumar, 2022)- 1. How much production do you expect from your arable land? How satisfied are you with growing crops on your land? 2. In the period between the growing of two crops, the growing season of another crop passes. What causes the crop not to grow during that time? 3. What are the causes behind the negligence of diversified cultivation to get productive crops/production from arable land? 4. It is noticed that your surrounding houses or any arable land, ponds, or other places are in a rotten situation, where they could be turned into crops or food production, even into versatile production by your conscious proper steps (Hopper, 2011). What are the causes of these potential misuses? 5. How many long days have your own or shared domestic ponds been in an unused/rotten situation? 6. What are the causes behind the remaining unused/rotten situation? 7. What are the causes of being depleted of mutual unity (Hopper, 2011)? 8. What kinds of steps are needed to continue the normal customary cultivation system and establish diversified cultivation for generating versatile production? 9. What are the causes behind the failure of customary cultivation and establishing a versatile agricultural system? 10. What kind of imbalance is there between siblings, family, or neighbors that hinders family cohesive production, such as fish farming in ponds, integrated farming, open water farming, or diversified farming? And By convenience, non-participation, close observation, various conversation, questionnaires and in various contexts; it is hypothetically measured (Figure 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4) there is prevailing unconsciousness, misunderstanding, conflicts, non-cooperation among 40 farmer‟s families out of 50. So, at the same time there is misuse of normal conventional agriculture growing in 40 farmer‟s arable sources/ lands out of 50. As a result, there cannot be noticed any versatile agriculture growing among 5 farmers' arable land too (Ahmed, 2011) (Thompson, 2007) (Faroque, 2011).


 Figure 2.1: Misuse of the vast majority of Seasonal agriculture cultivation (1)

Figure 2.2:  Misuse of the vast majority of Seasonal agriculture cultivation (2)

 

NFMSCA = The number of farmers who misuse seasonal cultivation of AWUSH.

NFCA = The number of farmers of cultivation of AWUSH.

TF = Total Farmers.


Figure 2.3: Misuse of Conventional agriculture cultivation (1)
Figure 2.3: Misuse of Conventional agriculture cultivation (1)

Figure 2.4: Misuse of Conventional agriculture cultivation (2)
Figure 2.4: Misuse of Conventional agriculture cultivation (2)

 

NFCACM = The number of farmers of conventional agriculture cultivation misuse.

NFCAC = The number of farmers of conventional agriculture cultivation.

 

3.2. Dowry System

 

It is a matter of grave concern about being the victim of poverty, dishonesty, immorality and spoils system in society, a stream of illogical thinking is nourished for child daughters by the illiterate parents in their illness and illiterate mentality (A, 2015) (Barber, 2019) (Hasle, 2004). Because of having big family members, lack of meeting basic necessities, caring for a family load, needs for extreme hardship work, even if lack of regular income or crisis, reckless competition in hardship industry; leading critical lifestyle day after day with poverty and a spoil‟s system, they become so devoid of morality, mankind, conscience, sympathy and kindness and feel so helpless with their daughter (Bhugra, 2016) (Hasle, 2004). For that reason, normally, they do not have the minimum sense to give their daughter in marriage to a worthy bridegroom. So when they send their daughter to an immature bridegroom’s house, then they fall into a spoil system of dowry (Anderson, 2007). The bridegroom’s family, avoiding morality, keeps busy with the conspiracy and tortures the bride, aiming at achieving dowry by imposing various selfish customs (Kamruzzaman, 2015) (Bhuiya, 2003) (Yesmin, 2013). For the dowry system, a family has to become mostly ruined economically by satisfying the bridegroom's covetous family. The above-mentioned tragic events are harming the development of society, increasing unemployment, illiteracy, population problems, poverty, food insecurity, hunger, and malnutrition.

 

3.3. Method

 

The data collection of dowry-related research has been conducted closely in natural settings by the non-participant observation method in real events (Cooper, 2004; Herskovits). By convenience from an indirect perspective and hiding the original purpose, the following questionnaire's answers have been observed. Though it was not possible to reach accurate numbers of events due to limitations (Akanle, 2020; Theofanidis, 2019). For example- 1. How much did it cost to get your daughters married? 2. What things are given to a daughter‟s marriage? 3. What things are given in accordance with demand on behalf of the bridegroom? What impact have you had for these costs? 4. What things are to give to daughter‟s house as a rule? If these aren't given, what kind of reaction are you able to tolerate? 5. Your daughter doesn't want to go to her husband "'s house because of his extremely bad character, covetous, and torture. But you emphasize to your daughter to go to her husband's house. What are the causes behind your emphasis in spite of the existing extreme inverse situation? 6. What kind of behavior do you get from your husband? 7. What does your husband, mother/father-in-law expect from you/your parent‟s house? 8. What kind of behaviors are used by the husband/parent-in-law? 9. How much are you satisfied/ despaired by your husband/parent in law? 10. Your husband has been tried several times in the local court for reckless torture. How did you finally see him change from his bad character or dishonesty? 11. What is the motive of the husband behind the repeated conspiratorial abuse of the wife? 12. What are the reasons for the wife to endure one torture after another at the hands of her husband? 13. What are the reasons and fears of reluctance to seek refuge in the law?

 

In the contexts of various normal marriage related conversation, torturing event on woman, tragic story of dowry related; it is hypothetically evaluated as following- Extremely hope/support for dowry=10, Normally hope / support for dowry=35, Neutral for dowry=3, Against for dowry=2, among 50 (Figure 3.1 & 3.2), though it varies among the proportion „Extremely hope/support for dowry‟ and „Normally hope / support for dowry‟ but it is rare to get one against dowry though it was needed for everyone against dowry (Herskovits) (Pachani, 2019) (Etikan, 2016).

 

Figure 3.1: Dowry Support Quantity and Percentage Analysis (1)


Figure 3.2: Dowry Support Quantity and Percentage Analysis (2)
Figure 3.2: Dowry Support Quantity and Percentage Analysis (2)

 

EIDS = Extremely Involvement in dowry supporting.

NIDS = Normally Involvement in dowry supporting.

NND = Normally neutral for dowry.

AD = Against dowry.

 

3.4. Child marriage and marriage tragedy for the worthy

 

Child marriage ruins the child's abstract thinking, future-oriented understanding, planning, and pursuing, which creates a hazard to social development. It destroys children’s rights. In a society, child marriage makes other children’s mental situation extremely depressed, affects children‟s schooling and education, makes them violent towards parents and guardians (Rukhadze, 2018) (Mahato, 2016). It creates an unequal situation in the field of social rights in society (Bhugra, 2016). Child marriage is dishonesty and cheating as it hides the truth (Barber, 2019). It is a major issue for human rights and social welfare. Dishonest, stubborn, unconscious guardians execute child marriage by cheating and making a hard and cruel situation for society (Tosam, 2015). In the field of marriage, worthy youths are seriously deprived which is extremely harmful to society, human rights, mankind, social values, and other matters are also extremely abusive (Roma Khanna, 2020; Wikham, 2014). Even in this modern age of information technology, child marriage is not being completely stopped (UNICEF, 2017; Malhotra, 2011). Child marriage is going on continuously by evading the age of maturity (Tosam, 2015) (Wasserstrom).

 

3.5. Method

 

In the context of a tragic hatred situation of child marriage and for obtaining data information, by a non-participant close observation method, several questionnaires are used for finding the proportion of percentage hiding the actual purpose of the study. As like - 1. How old are you? 2. How old is your child? 3. What is your child's status?-married or unmarried. 4. What is the cause of your discrepancy in identity in accordance with your family background? 5. What is the purpose of being very close in age between you and your child? 6. If your child's age is A, then your age should be B in accordance with the proportion, but what is the reason behind it? 7. Did you get a child married as a child? It is commonly noticeable in a family that among the children, the daughters are given in marriage very hurriedly, but for the sons, marriage is not given/performed very late either (Bhugra, 2016; Roma Khanna, 2020). 8. What are the causes behind this status? 9. What are the causes behind the child being married and the matured, worthy youth being unmarried?

 

It is noticed that in some families, the adolescents are not mature, not economically sufficient, of short ability, but the immature adolescents are given in marriage, violating the growth mentality of adolescents, social values and structure, law, and creating an abusive situation for worthy adult youth, comparably sufficient economic condition, but the adult youths are not being married. From the entire situation, the following questions have been raised. 10. What are the causes behind existing child marriage and marriage later in society? 11. What are the causes that older youths in your family/community are kept unmarried compared with the younger ones?

 

(A)- On the basis of ideas and of the convenience of non-participation in close observation methods, a large discrepancy in the spoils system in social life processes has been noticed among 25 young and middle-aged adults (Figures 4.1 & 4.2). The large discrepancy among 25 young and middle adults with the same label is that there are 6 young and middle adults who are recently married, 13 are yet unmarried, and 6 adults who are now fathers-in-law. This is nothing but a very brutal discrimination, nonsense, brutal conscienceless immorality, spoils the system of social values and provisions. A description list of brutal Discrimination among 25 middle-aged young adults of the same age in the following table:


Figure 4.1: Analysis of Child Marriage and Marriage Tragedy: Quantity and Percentage (1)
Figure 4.1: Analysis of Child Marriage and Marriage Tragedy: Quantity and Percentage (1)

Figure 4.2: Analysis of Child Marriage and Marriage Tragedy: Quantity and Percentage (2)
Figure 4.2: Analysis of Child Marriage and Marriage Tragedy: Quantity and Percentage (2)

 

NRMMYA = The number of recently married middle young adults.

NRF = The number of recently father-in-laws.

NRU = The number of remaining unmarried.

 

(B)- On the basis of the hypothetical idea of an unmatched background, and by the convenience of non-participation

close observation method, the proportion of child married families has been identified as follows: 22

families out of 27 same-label families from a certain small area (Figures 4.3 & 4.4).


Figure 4.3: A description list of child marriage families of recent times (1)
Figure 4.3: A description list of child marriage families of recent times (1)

Figure 4.4: A description list of child marriage families of recent times (2)
Figure 4.4: A description list of child marriage families of recent times (2)

 

NCMF = The number of Child married families among the same label families.

NFWCM = The number of

families without child marriage among the same label families.

TNF = The total number of families of the same label

 

3.6. A recent miserable child marriage event:

 

In September 2021, one day, a young person named X met with his classmate named Y from primary school. He is 27. Meanwhile, knowing about each other, Y asked X about X’s marital status. Y became strange knowing X’s unmarried status. Y said to X proudly that Y was married and a father-in-law, giving his daughter in marriage, when X was not yet married at 27 years old. Comparably, it means Y was marred into immaturity by child marriage, and the daughter of Y is also a victim of child marriage in this modern world (Malhotra, 2011) (Wasserstrom) (Tosam, 2015). But it is not an uncommon matter, as stopping child marriage has not become completely possible yet by law (Malhotra, 2011). Another side to this society’s entire present social values and management

system: X is unmarried, too. Due to spoiled systems of society, there are many young people who are victims of marriage deprivation, like X. Some are excessively fulfilled before maturity and without being worthy or self-sufficient. Some are extremely deprived in terms of worth and maturity, which is an extreme inequity and deprivation (Bhugra, 2016) (Wikham, 2014) (Yesmin, 2013).

 

3.7. Causes behind poverty

 

Here, the existing major causes of extreme poverty are reckless dishonesty, disunity, discrimination, and disobedience of the law, etc., among unconscious people in society, and the low standard of living of illiterate people (A, 2015) (LEWIS, 2015) (Wasserstrom). In a word, it is clear that openly secret, all unlawful misdeeds are mainly and extremely liable for miserable poverty, extremely low standard of living, and interrupted human rights (Hasle, 2004) (Riti, 2018). Besides the above- mentioned, all the problems are liable for poverty. Open secret cheating, dishonesty, falsehood, and deception brutally destroy creativity, curiosity, and dignity of society; Due to leading an immoral, unmethodical, and cheating lifestyle, the unconscious society people are suffering from a crisis of basic demands (A, 2015) (Hopper, 2011) (Katherine Alaimo, 2020). As a result, they are engaging in personal usury exploitation, deprivation, false expectations, cheating, non- cooperation, violent systems in mutual domestic life and between poor and rich people (Bhugra, 2016) (Bhuiya, 2003) (Hasle, 2004). For those reasons, many families are the victims of extreme hardship and a ruinable poor lifestyle (Katherine Alaimo, 2020).

 

Following the cycle of domestic and social exploitation, deprivation, false expectations, cheating, non- cooperation, violence, many families have to become proletarians with the burden of debt in spite of their hard work, constant income, and striving. Moreover, various miserable situations prevail among them with silent helplessness and deteriorations of human rights (Hasle, 2004).

 

By the non-participation close observation method, it has been noticed that about every community of 6 families is in severe economic debt, 8 families in critical economic distress, 10 families in minimum economic position, and 6 families in middle economic position out of 30 families (Figures 5.1 & 5.2). And there are very few to do conscious and help the victim’s families in the right way instead of non-cooperation.


Figure 5.1: Distribution of Household by level of Economic Distress (1)
Figure 5.1: Distribution of Household by level of Economic Distress (1)

Figure 5.2: Distribution of Household by level of Economic Distress (2)
Figure 5.2: Distribution of Household by level of Economic Distress (2)

 

NFSED = The number of families in severe economic debt. NFCED = The number of families in critical economic distress.

NFMEP = The number of families in the minimum economic position. NFMIEP = The number of families in the middle economic position.

NTF = The Number of total families.

 

3.8. A tragic event

 

In this world, on the one hand, a group of decent people is working tirelessly to ensure equal rights of women in society, empowerment, and participation at all levels. On the other hand, some selfish and insidious quarters are busy trying to destroy women’s rights and harm them (Bhuiya, 2003) (Rahman K. F., 2019). There is a prevailing misdemeanor of arrogance in society in the name of establishing and protecting social justice, self-respect, and values by torturing/vexing, and harming the weak and helpless of society without extending a hand of cooperation and sympathy to them for vital social and national needs (Mazar, 2008). Constantly busy violating women’s rights, such a heinous and tragic incident derived from the natural environment by research study and close non-participant observation has been cited as an example of a despicable attempt to deprive women’s rights from

society (Cooper, 2004) (Herskovits).

 

It has been confirmed from various sources, evidence and arguments that by causing havoc in a community, two persons named A and B, including others, caused serious injuries and obstruction in the hands of a person named X because of permitting his wife named Y to involvement for outside occupation and income for surviving their family from hunger of extreme poverty. But they are to bear the injury as another load on their struggling poverty life. Moreover, the judgment of injuring X’s hand is undermined by the arrogance of misguided individuals involved in the offense .

 

A couple named X (husband) and Y(wife) of a poor family, they both have to work out for income and survive their family. And they have been working as labor for long days. But a woman coming out offends some conscienceless people’s arrogance. Even if there was no sympathy or cooperative effort to alleviate the extreme poverty of the couple, some in the society are determined to close off the woman’s way of working on the outside of home. Being subjected to extreme poverty the woman has to choose work outside the home. But being jealous of her profession, a neighbor uncle of the couple named Z imposes an escalation on Y(wife), accusing him of an illegal love relationship with him, though Y(wife),denies it. But the slander on the woman continued to spread with conspiracy. A local section of society held a meeting to speak out against false accusations. The person Z is warned never to do such event in spite of being male himself. But his group pride with jealous language that male can do everything as he is male. After yet situation is controlled and kept silence from out breaking escalation. But more other the escalation is imposed on Y(wife) furiously and conspires. Being persuasive to same person and others, they apply

pressure that woman working is escalation for community without consideration of livelihood solution.

 

Added that the woman Y talks with othesr, laugh in the vehicle, in the street or with anyone, purchases on the market alone. One day at a time, leaving for work as usual, the couple family of X and Y is hindered on the way by the person Z and his group & clashed extremely with Z group. Even if X is made physical challenge, injuring his hand. Though local court give a normal solution imposing a fine of demurrage, in spite of very extreme matters.

But it is a matter of great sorrow that minimum compensation fines are imposed for resolving unwanted conflicts, but instead of settling the minimum fines, delays and arrogance are shown (Bhugra, 2016) (Hasle, 2004). But the most notable thing is the shame of being by the side of the helpless hurts someone’s arrogance. The women stepping out of the house for livelihood to survive in extreme poverty is a blow for some of the pretentious people in the society,

 

3.9. Method

 

For collecting data and ensuring the outs and ins of the despicable tragic phenomenon, the following questionnaire is applied by non-participant close observation method. As like- 1. What is the cause behind the disobedience of the verdict? 2. What could be the target of the accused behind the creation of such a naked incident? 3. How difficult was the verdict of the local court against the accused? What was the motive behind Y‟s earnings in town? 4. What was the alternative way to solve the family settlement? 5. How did society recognize Y‟s earnings? 6. What is the reason for showing arrogance of the accused by disobeying the verdict? 7. What was the ability of the plaintiff to take asylum to the higher court to get a suitable trial? 8. What is the need to change the attitude towards women in society in order to equalize the rights of women? 9. How excessive or feasible or low level was the judgment of the superiority?

 

3.10. Suicidal event

 

As there is a decay of social values, morality, responsibility and loyalty among unconscious people, they are losing trust, sympathy, unity and cooperation with each other. Due to the lack of trust, sympathy, unity- cooperation, some lose patience, become bankrupt, suffer humiliation and deprivation and even choose the path of suicide. In accordance with convenience obtained data, being victims of various social tragic situation to the recent years there is occurred 10 suicidal deaths including a 9 years old child in small area (Joiner, 2005) (George, 2016) (Qiu, 2017).

 

4. Status of justice of conscience, social values and morality

 

In this society, the deplorable deterioration of conscience, social values and morality is noticeable (A, 2015) (Rahman M. M., 2018). Although the use of obscene language or words as jokes or mutual interrogation normally in shops, chats, laughter is considered very normal, it is against conscience and values. This is highly reprehensible compared to a decent society. Parents neglect the rights of girls to build the rights of boys, or abuse the rights of boys to build the rights of girls, that‟s kind of thinking is illogical and immoral (Bhugra, 2016). There is a sharp decline in conscience and morality in this society which has resulted in human rights and living. Child marriage is an extreme curse on society and an offence to modern time in this society. It is also against social values. On one hand, child marriage, on the other hand, not giving marriage of worthy and adult youths is against conscience (Rahman M. M., 2018).

 

Totally, all the matters are extreme injustice and spoils systems that are harmful to mankind, human rights, social infrastructure and unitary social development. False behavior, extreme false asylum, severe disobedience to the law, open deception, malpractice, etc. are serious contradictions of conscience and values and a severe injustice (Wasserstrom) (Barber, 2019) (LEWIS, 2015). Denial of merit to the deserving, stunting the development of society, giving place to the unworthy in the deserving place, depriving the deserving of their rights, making society unscrupulous, destroying the values, which is a serious contradiction and severe injustice (Bhugra, 2016) (LEWIS, 2015) (kamruzzaman, 2016).

 

4.1. Method

 

As asylum of falseness, using unfairness for selfishness, offering privileges without considering worthy and unworthy, showing cooperation in non-cooperation, showing truthiness in falseness, showing honesty in dishonesty, disobeying law and social values etc all are conscienceless activities. So conscienceless activities are prevalent without limitations in society. In the contexts of the prevailing spoils system, disobeying law and social values, deprivation, tragic situation, dishonesty, depletion; it is hypothetically measured that about 30 are involved in conscienceless activities, 15 in extreme conscience activities, 5 in buffer out of 50 (Figure 6.1 & 6.2).


Figure 6.1: Obscene language using percentage in a normal environment/situation (1)
Figure 6.1: Obscene language using percentage in a normal environment/situation (1)

Figure 6.2: Obscene language using percentage in a normal environment/situation (2)
Figure 6.2: Obscene language using percentage in a normal environment/situation (2)

 

NPUOL = The number of persons using obscene language.

NPUUL = The number of persons using usual language.

NTP = The number of total persons.

 

Obsence of language is contradicted by values. It is commonly noticed when walking together with several unconscious and illiterate people. In any quarrel or group chatting/gossiping of 10 people at least 8 people don’t feel ashamed or worry about using obscene language. But the remaining 2 people can’t realize the necessity of ideal language too.

 

4.2. Result

 

The report shows brutal major problems, spoils system, depletion of social values, severe discrimination of human rights and equity, depletion of potential developments, reckless dishonesty and cheating, lack of social responsibility, unconsciousness and noncooperation of people of society (A, 2015) (LEWIS, 2015) (Rahman M. M., 2018).

 

A lot of honesty, values and empathy are shown but in reality various dishonesty, cheating, disobedience of law, illiteracy and unconsciousness etc. are increasing complexities in society including depletion of human rights, social development and rural structure, food security, health and nutrition etc (Barber, 2019) (LEWIS, 2015) (Rahman M. M., 2018). So there is a need for more indispensable mutual cooperation of citizens to escape from depletion. But all kind of unexpected, illegal, valueless and unscrupulous activities are removing everyone from mutual cooperation, unity and social development work.

 

The cheaters are cheating; the unconscious are in a disappointed and harmed situation; the dishonest are in dishonesty and increasing depletion of social values, morality and development; the worthy general citizens are in deprivation of various rights. Low stage, middle stage citizens are in a hazard and danger situation (Hopper, 2011) (Rahman K. F., 2019). Cheating, dishonesty and all forms discrimination, deprivation etc are being overcome over normal limitations and increased severe situation when the problems are commonly manifested in society, destroying ways of development and human rights. Severe cheating is breeding corruption. Corruption is destroying human rights and social development, breeding deprivation, discrimination, injustice. Cheating helps a high rate of child marriage. Child marriage is harming children‟s rights, increasing population problems, poverty, unemployment, domestic violence.

 

5. Limitation

 

Due to limitation, it was not possible to collect data from the very original or deep stages of various events to ensure perfect evidence of the various issues and events mentioned in the article (Akanle, 2020) (Theofanidis, 2019). But the tragedy of the issues mentioned in the article is undoubtedly true. The descriptive problems are brutal and extremely real because the research article has been prepared by conducting in natural settings of an area under X district of Bangladesh. And it has been written on a descriptive process conducted by participants with non-participant in a very close observation method of natural circumstances (Nassaji, 2015) (Cooper, 2004) (Simkus, 2022). No questionnaire has been collected from natural conducted purposively by participant method. Data, questionnaire and answers have been collected from natural problematic phenomena, behaviors, conversation, events etc (Etikan, 2016) (Simkus, 2022). Though this research study has not been conducted to another area having limitations and this research study has been performed in an area on the basis of hypothetical concepts/ideas and depending on tragic social situations and phenomena, but it’s every information must be true for any area or sphere of society in Bangladesh as the study is designed on the basis of versatile problematic situations (Herskovits).

 

6. Conclusion

 

In a word, behind the civilized and ideal rules and values in society, Lies, deception, dishonesty, deprivation, degradation, plunder, inequality are on the rise. So, for developing social structures and accelerating the slower development steps of society and sustaining human rights, there is urgent need of elimination of all forms of dishonesty as like cheating, discrimination, lying, deprivation, inequality etc. There is an urgent need to carry out investigation and intervention to thoroughly identify, confirm and eliminate all crimes and problems mentioned in the report.

 

If all ongoing problems are eliminated, then development of society and standard of a proper lifestyle will be increased fast. Society will be free from darkness and anarchy. Since the information obtained from lies, deception and dishonesty etc. indicates that there is intense rudeness, non-idealism in society; therefore, by blocking the way of lies, deception and dishonesty by necessary measures, basic civilization and ideals can be achieved in society. By stopping child marriage strictly and perfectly, the development structure of society will be strengthened. Applying proper cultivation methods by necessary steps, self-sustainable agricultural production will be enriched. Poverty, hunger and shortages of nutrition will be eradicated. Establishing the mindset to perform one‟s duties/tasks with self-participation and involvement can accelerate the development of society. So there is a need for intervention that can be carried out to remove all kind of spoils, unmethodical systems and problems with society.

 

Funding: Not applicable.

 

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

Informed Consent Statement/Ethics Approval: Not applicable.

 

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies: This study has not used any generative AI tools or technologies in the preparation of this manuscript.

 


References

Alex Barber, (14 November 2019). Lying, Misleading, and Dishonesty, The Journal of Ethics Volume24, pages 141-164(2020).
Nina Mazar. (2008).The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance, Journal of Marketing Research (2008), Volume 45, Issue 6, p. 633-644.
Nicole L. Mead, Roy F. Baumeister,[...], and Dan Ariel, Too Tired to Tell the Truth: Self- Control Resource Depletion and Dishonesty, Journal of experimental social psychology,
MICHEL LEWIS. MARCH-APRIL 2015. The Origins of Lying and Deception in Everyday Life, AMERICAN SCIENTIST, VOLUME 103, NUMBER 2, PAGE 128 DOI:10.1511/2015.113.128
Dinesh Bhugra. (2016). Social discrimination and social justice, International Review of Psychiatry, 28:4, 336-341, DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2016.1210359
Abbas bhuiya.(2003). Nature of domestic violence against women in a rural area of Bangladesh: Implication for preventive Interventions, Journal of Health Population and Nutrition 21(1):48-54
Rahman, Khandaker Farzana(2019) “Focus on Domestic Violence in Bangladesh: A study from Criminological Perspectives,” Journal of International Women’s Studies: Vol. 20: Iss. 3, Article 10.
Noor Mohammad Sarker*and Sultana Yesmin* Domestic Violence in Bangladesh Analyzing from the Contemporary Peace& Conflict Perspectives,Peace and Security Review Vol. 5, No. 10, Second Quarter, 2013, p.74-90
Md. Matiur Rahman, Md. Abdullah Al Yonus, Md. Kmal Uddin , Novemger 2018, Crisis of Morals and Values: A Bangladesh Perspective, Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 6, No. 11, doi:10:11114/ijsss.v6i11.3687
A, Anis. (2015). “Values, Ethics and morality fleeting alarmingljy in Bangladesh”. The Daily Observer. January 25, 2015.
Roma Khanna, Dr. Pirtibha Sharma. (March/2020). Deterioration of Moral values and Ethics Among Youth. Pareshodh Journal, Volume IX, Issue III, ISSN NO 2347-6648 Page No 10991.
Sophie Wickham. (2014). The Impact of Social Deprivation on Paranoia, Hallucinations, Mania and Depression: The Role of Discrimination Social Support, Stress and Trust, PLoS ONE 9(8):e105140
Rai, S., et al. (2011). Depletion and social reproduction. [Coventry]: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick (Working paper no.274)
Lena Hasle, (2004). Too poor for rights? Access to justice for poor women in Bangladesh: A case study, London School of Economics, 2003/2004.
Mbih Jerome Tosam.(2015). The Ethical and Social Implications of Age-Cheating in Africa. International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1-11.
Wasserstrom, “Disobeying the Law.” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 58, no. 21, 1961, pp. 641–653.
Tamanna Hoq Riti.(2018). National Human Rights Commission, Bangladesh: Existing Challenges and Expectations of Civil Society. ISBN: 978-984-34-6006-6
Md.kamruzzaman. (2016). The Evaluation of Human Rights: An Overview in Historical Perspective, American Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(2): 5-12.
Ankit Kumar, May 2022, OBSERVARION METHOD, University of Delhi.
Cooper, J., Lewis, R. and Urquhart, C. (2004) “Using participant or non-participant observation to explain information behaviour” Information Research, 9(4) paper 184
Smith, Mark J. (1998). Social Science in Question: Towards a Postdisciplinary Framework. Published in assiciation with The Open University. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. A. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Simkus, J. (2022, Jan 30). Convenience sampling: Definition, Method and Examples. Simply Psychology.
Hossein Nassaji, Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis, Language Teaching Research 2015, Vol. 19(2), 129-132 Doi:10.1177/1362168815572747
Blake E Ashforth. (2003). The Normalization of corruption in Organizations, Research in Organitional Behavior 25(1):1-52.
KRISTIANSEN, STEIN, and MUHID RAMLI. “Buying an Income: The Market for Civil Service Positions in Indonesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 28, no. 2, 2006, pp. 207–233. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25798782. Accessed 27 Apr. 2021.
Hopper. (2011). The social unconscious in persons, groups, and societies, Vol 1: Mainly theory, American Psychological Association, Vol. 1.
Katherine Alaimo, Mariana Chilton Sonya J. (2020). Food insecurity, hunger, and malnutrition, January2020 DOI:10.1016/B978-0-818460-8.00017-4 in book: Present Knowledge in Nutrition(pp.311-326)
Raihan M.J., farzana F.D., Sultana S., Saha K.K., Haque M.A., Rahman A.S., Mahmud Z., Black
R.E., Choudhury N., Ahmed T., 2018. Effect of seasons on household food insecurity in Bangladesh [online]. Food and Energy Security.Dhaka. May 2018.
Karyn A Havas.(2011). Food security: its components and challenges, International Journal of Food Safety Nutrition and Public Health 4(1):4 – 11.
Nesar Ahmed.(2011). Integrated rice-fish farming in Bangladesh: Meeting the challenges of food security, International Society for Plant Pathology, 3(1):81-92.
Thompson, P.and Colavito, L.(2007). Economic Value of Bangladesh Wetlands. Technical Paper No. 6. MACH: Dhaka.
Nishat, Z. Hussain, M.K. Roy and A. Karim(eds.) Freshwater Wetlands in Bangladesh: Issues and Approaches for Management. Dhaka: IUCN.
Umme Kulsum Ferdousi. (2013). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods and Co-management Intervention: The Case of Mokosh Beel, Gazipur, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Abdullah Al – Faroque.(2011). SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: A GREAT CHALLENGE IN BANGLADESH, International Journal of Agricultural Research Innovation and Technology.
Anderson.(2007). The Economics of Dowry and Brideprice, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (4): 151-174.
Md. Kamruzzaman.(2015). Dowry Related Violence Against Rural Women in Bangladesh, American Institute of Science.
Magda Rukhadze.(2018). Early marriage as a barrier to the career and educational opportunity for the youth in Georgia, Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences.
A Malhotra.(2011). Solutions to End Child Marriage - What the Evidence Shows, International Center for Research on Women (ICRW).
UNFPA UNICEF.(2017). Ending child marriage in Bangladesh.P(4)
Santosh Kumar Mahato.(2016). Causes and Consequences of Child Marriage: A Perspective, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 7(7):698-702.
Gworge, S. E., Page, A. C., Hooke, G. R., & Stritzke, W. G. (2016). Causes and Consequences of Child Marriage: A Perspective, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 7970:698-702.
Joiner, T. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.1001/jama.295.17.2082
Qiu, T., Klonsky, E. D., & Klein, D. N. (2017). Hopelessness predicts suicide ideation but not attempts: A 10-year longitudinal study. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(6), 718-722. doi:10.1111/sltb.12328
Naila Pachani,(December, 2019). Hypothetical Research Essay Assignment. Manash University (Australia).
Herskovits, Melville J. “The Hypothetical Situation: A Technique of Field Research.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, vol. 6, no. 1, 1950, pp. 32-40. JSTOR,
Theofanidis, Dimitrios, & Fountouki, Antigoni.(2019). Limitations And Delimitations In The Research Process. Perioperative nursing (GORNA), E-ISSN:2241-3634, vol.7, no. 3, 155-162.
Akanle, O., Ademuson, A.O. and Shittu, O.S. (2020). Scope and Limitation of Study in Social Research. In Jegede, A.S. and Isiugo-Abanihe, U.C. (eds). Contemporary Issues in Social Research. Ibadan Unuversity press. Pp. 105-114.

bottom of page