A Qualitative Research on the Effect of Chaos and Butterfly Effect on Education
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 03 June 2022

A Qualitative Research on the Effect of Chaos and Butterfly Effect on Education

Okan Sarigoz

Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.503

Pages: 433-445

Keywords: Chaos, Inconsistency, Unpredictability, Uncertainty, Butterfly Effect

Abstract

Chaos is a scientific approach that refers to the fact that systems or behaviors that are thought to be irregular, complex, impossible to predict actually occur in an orderly manner. The aim of this research is to determine what chaos and butterfly effect mean in terms of education, the importance of chaos and butterfly effect in education and its effects on education. The research is a qualitative study aimed at determining the opinions of teachers about chaos and butterfly effect. The case study method was used in the research. The research was carried out with 23 teachers selected on a voluntary basis among 44 teachers who are doing master's degrees in educational sciences. Research data were collected with a semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher. All the data obtained were analyzed by coding using the content analysis method. In the research, it was concluded that the chaos and butterfly effect positively affect students' development of different ideas, improve their ability to analyze, activate metacognitive functions, and give students the ability to solve problems more quickly by evaluating them from different point of view.

References

  1. Akcin, M.E., & Zengin, O. (2020). Duzensizligin duzeni: Kaos kurami ve sosyal hizmet. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31(3), 1307-1323.

  2. Akmansoy, V. (2012). Kaos teorisi ve egitime yansimalari. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Burdur.

  3. Altun, S.A. (2001). Kaos ve yonetim. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi Dergisi, 28, 451-469.

  4. Aricioglu, M.A., & Karabiyik, H. (2019). Orgutlerin gelecegine bir onerme olarak kaos teorisi ve kaos olgusunu anlamak. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(2), 145-156.

  5. Arslan, I. (2020). Kuresel bir tehdit (Covid-19 salgini) ve degisime yolculuk. Uskudar Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 1-36.

  6. Bakeri S.B. (1995). Chaos theory in educational systems; Principals’ perceptions of sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertationi East Tennessee State University.

  7. Baysal, M. (2014). Kaos teoremi ve ekonomi: 2008 kriz degerlendirmesi, Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Konya.

  8. Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Complexity and information 9. systems research in the emerging digital world. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 1–17.

  9. Berger, R.H., Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Hernandez, M.M., Thompson, M., Spinrad, T., & Southworth, J. (2017). Effortful control and school adjustment: The moderating role of classroom chaos. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53, 108-119.

  10. Bicici, F. (2016). Kaos teorisi, determinizm ve yeni bilim paradigmasi surecinde sosyal bilimler ve turizm arastirmalari acisindan onemi. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 3(1), 29-38.

  11. Bolay, S.H. (2018). Felsefe doktrinleri ve terimleri sozlugu. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.

  12. Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  13. Cramer, F. (1998). Kaos ve duzen sirat koprusundeki hayat. (Cev. Veysel Atayman). Istanbul: Alan Yayincilik.

  14. Demirtas, H. (2006). Yonetim kuram ve yaklasimlari egitiminin ilkogretim okulu ogretmenlerinin sinif yonetimi paradigmalarina etkileri. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 1(1), 49-70.

  15. Durusken, C. (2004). Khaos ve kosmos'un etimolojik incelenmesi. S. Ural, Y. Yuksel, A. Koc, A. Sen, G. Hacibekiroglu, & M. Ozer icinde, Mantik Matematik ve Felsefe II. Ulusal Sempozyumu: Kaos (s. 5-12). Istanbul: Istanbul Kultur Universitesi Yayinlari.

  16. Egi, A. (2014). Gundelik hayatta kaotik kurumsallasmalar. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Balikesir Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.

  17. Erturk, A. (2012). Kaos kurami: Yonetim ve egitimdeki yansimalari. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 20(3), 849-886.

  18. Gleick, J. (1995). Kaos yeni bir bilim teorisi. (F. Uccan, Cev.) Ankara: TUBITAK Populer Bilim Kitapligi.

  19. Gleick, J. (2016). Kaos. (Cev. I. A. Demir) Istanbul: ALFA Yayinlari.

  20. Grant, A.A., Jeon, L., & Buettner, C.K. (2019). Chaos and commitment in the early childhood education classroom: Direct and indirect associations through teaching efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 50-60.

  21. Guastello, S., & Liebovitch, L.S. (2009). Chaos and Complexity in Psychology. S. Guastello, M. Koopmans, D. Pincus, (Eds), Cambridge University Press, New York.

  22. Gunter, H. (1995). Jurassic management: Chaos and management development in educational institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(4), 5-30.

  23. Gursakal, N. (2001). Yeni bilim. Is Guc Dergisi, 3(1), No: 110.

  24. Hosokawa, R., & Katsura, T. (2018). Effect of socioeconomic status on behavioral problems from preschool to early elementary school–A Japanese longitudinal study. PLoS one, 13(5), e0197961.

  25. Gursakal, N. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde karmasiklik ve kaos. Ankara: Nobel yayincilik.

  26. Hacicaferoglu, B. & Hacicaferoglu, S.  (2013). Examination of job satisfaction levels of folk dance trainers in their work environments in terms of certain variables (Example of Mugla province). Energy Education Science and Technology Part D: Social Political Economic and Cultural Research, 5(3), 107-116.

  27. Hacicaferoglu, S., Hacicaferoglu, B. & Secer, M. (2015). Halk Oyunlari Bransina Katilan Sporcularin Yarisma Oncesi Kaygi Duzeylerinin Bazi Degiskenler Acisindan Incelenmesi. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport,  SI 4, 288-297.

  28. Hunter, D. (1996). Chaos theory and educational administration: Imaginative foil or useful framework. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 11(2), 9-34.

  29. Karacay, T. (2004). Determinizm ve kaos. Mantik, Matematik ve Felsefe II. Ulusal Sempozyumu, 21-24 Eylul, Istanbul.

  30. Karacelik, H. E. (2021). Orgutlerde stratejik yonetim surecinin kaos teorisi uzerinden degerlendirilmesi: Yoneticiler uzerinden bir arastirma. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.

  31. Karakose. M.A., Imamoglu, S.Z., & Ince, H. (2020). Donusumcu ve adaptif liderlik tarzlarinin orgutsel dayaniklilik kapasitesinin gelistirilmesindeki rolu: Kavramsal bir model onerisi. Dogus Universitesi Dergisi, 21(1), 153-169.

  32. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Resonances: Second language development and language planning and policy from a complexity theory perspective. In Language Policy and Language Acquisition Planning. Springer: Springer International Publishing, 203–217.

  33. Levy, D. (1994). Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 167-178.

  34. Lorenz, E. (1995). Essence of chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  35. Martin, A., Razza, R.A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2012). Specifying the links between household chaos and preschool children’s development. Early Child Development and Care, 182, 1247-1263.

  36. Northouse, P.G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (Seventh Edition). California: Sage Publications, Inc.

  37. Pallotti, G. (2018). Doing interlanguage analysis in school contexts. Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development, 1(1), 159–190.

  38. Pamuk, N. (2013). Dinamik sistemlerde kaotik zaman dizilerinin tespiti. Balikesir Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi, 15(1), 78-92.

  39. Ruelle, D. (1995). Rastlanti ve kaos. (4. Basim) Ankara: Tubitak Populer Bilim Kitaplari. Ozyurt Matbacilik.

  40. Ruelle, D. (2014). Rastlanti ve kaos. (D. Yurtoren, Cev.) Istanbul: Say Yayinlari.

  41. Sardar, Z., & Abrams, I. (2011). Kaos. (D. Guliyeva, Cev.) Istanbul: NTV Yayinlari.

  42. Seeger, M. (2002). Chaos and crisis: Propositions for a general theory of crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 28(4), 329-337.

  43. Toremen, F. (2000). Kaos teorisi ve egitim yoneticisinin rolu. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 22, 203-219.

  44. Turan, M. (2008) Kaos teorisi: Bauman ve Bakhtin. Ankara Universitesi Dil ve Tarih-Cografya Fakultesi Felsefe Bolumu Dergisi, 19, 45-66.

  45. Ucar, S. (2010). Kaos teorisinin felsefi ozellikleri. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Istanbul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Istanbul.

  46. Ufuktepe, U. (2004). Kaos ve sosyal degisim. S. Ural, Y. Yuksel, A. Koc, A. Sen, G. Hacibekiroglu, & M. Ozer icinde, Mantik, Matematik ve Felsefe II. Ulusal Sempozyumu: Kaos (s. 211-221). Istanbul: Istanbul Kultur Universitesi Yayinlari.

  47. Ural, S. (2004). Kozmostan kaosa. S. Ural, Y. Yuksel, A. Koc, A. Sen, G. Hacibekiroglu, & M. Ozer icinde, Mantik Matematik ve Felsefe II. Ulusal Sempozyumu: Kaos (s. 353-363). Istanbul: Istanbul Kultur Universitesi Yayinlari.

  48. Warren, K. (2021). Chaos theory and complexity theory. C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work.

  49. Weitkamp, E. (2021). Visualizing the Invisible: Performing chaos theory. Leonardo, 54(3), 289-294.

  50. Yakut, H.F. (2018). Chaos theory and new approaches in management. Suleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 9(22), 161-168.

  51. Yazgan, T. (2020). Egitimde kaos teorisi kapsaminda literatur calismasi. International Online Conference economics & Social Sciences, Proceedind Book, 8-9 September, Kyrenia, TRNC.

  52. Yick, L.T. (2009). Organizing around intelligence: A new paradigm (2.Ed.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

bottom of page