Applying Humanism-based Instructional Strategies in Inclusive Education Schools
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 21 June 2021

Applying Humanism-based Instructional Strategies in Inclusive Education Schools

Zaid N. Al-Shammari

Kuwait University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.308

Pages: 629-631

Keywords: Humanism-based, Inclusive Education, Students with SEND

Abstract

This article addresses the theoretical perspective to practice of humanism-based instructional strategies in inclusive education schools. Recommendations are offered for both special education and general classroom teachers considering humanism-based instructional strategies in inclusive education schools.

References

  1. Al-Shammari, Z. (2012). Using AMLO to improve the quality of teacher education outcomes. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), 48–62.

  2. Al-Shammari, Zaid N. (2019a). Leading special education teachers to envision evidence-based metacognitivist instructional strategies in inclusive education schools. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(2), 373–376.

  3. Al-Shammari, Z. (2019b). How well effective evidence-based cognitivism instructional strategies practiced by inclusion classroom teachers in Kuwait?. Saudi Journal of Special Education, 10, 107–137.

  4. Al-Shammari, Z. (2019c). Evidence-based teaching strategies with effect size for all levels of education. 1st ed. Kuwait, Hawally: Islamic Zamzam Library.

  5. Al-Shammari, Z. (2019d). Effects of special education teachers' specialization and teaching experience on using evidence-based cognitivist instructional strategies in inclusion classrooms. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning, Paris, France, 19–21 April 2019. ISBN: 978-609-8239-39-3 (pp. 41–45).

  6. DeCarvalho, R. J. (1991), The humanistic paradigm in education. The Humanistic Psychologist, 19(1), 88–104. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxylocal.library.nova.edu/10.1080/08873267.1991.998675.

  7. Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.

  8. Hattie, J. A. (2011). The argument: Visible teaching and visible learning. Visible Learning for Teachers, 22–38.

  9. Hattie, J. A. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79.

  10. Hattie, J. A. (2017). Updated list of factors influencing student achievement. Available at: http://www.evidencebasedteaching.org.au/hatties-2017-updated-list/ (Accessed 11 September 2017).

  11. Hornby, G. (2014). Inclusive special education: Evidence-based practices for children with special needs and disabilities. New York: Springer.

  12. Huitt, W. (2009). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive. Available at: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/affect/humed.html (accessed 15 April 2017).

  13. Jenkins, J. R., Antil, L. R., Wayne, S. K., & Vadasy, P. F. (2003). How cooperative learning works for special education and remedial students. Exceptional children, 69(3), 279–292.

  14. Malone, K. W., Fodor, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. (2019). Peer tutoring to support inclusion of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities at the secondary level. Inclusion, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-7.1.1

  15. McLeod, S. A. (2015). Humanism. Retrieved from: www.simplypsychology.org/humanistic.html

  16. Ncube, S. (2011). Peer-collaboration: An effective teaching strategy for inclusive classrooms. The Journal of International Association of Special Education, 12(1), 79–81.

  17. Rogers, C. (1959). Significant learning in therapy and in education, Educational Leadership, 16(4), 232–242.

  18. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.

  19. Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 358–374). New York: Routledge.

  20. Slavin, R. E. (2014). Making cooperative learning powerful. Educational Leadership, 72(2), 22–26.

  21. Stenhoff, D. M., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (2007). A review of the effects of peer tutoring on students with mild disabilities in secondary settings. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 8–30.

  22. Sutherland, K., Wehby, J., & Gunter, P. (2000). The effectiveness of cooperative learning with students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A literature review. Behavioral Disorders, 25(3), 225–238. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43153746

bottom of page