Exploring the Prospective Teachers’ Views about Writing Topic Selection and Their Writing Skills
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 15 December 2022

Exploring the Prospective Teachers’ Views about Writing Topic Selection and Their Writing Skills

Betül Keray Dinçel

Aksaray University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.631

Pages: 395-406

Keywords: Writing Topic Selection, Writing Skill, Views, Prospective Teachers

Abstract

The study aims to reveal the students’ -the prospective teachers for this study- the views about writing topic selection and their writing skills. This study employs phenomenological qualitative research design. The study group consists of fourty prospective teachers studying in the Turkish Language Teaching program. The reason why they were selected as the study group is that they completed the written expression and writing training courses, and their experiences in writing were optimum. In the analysis of the data, the content analysis method and NVivo 11 Pro program were used. The first finding from the study was about writing topic selection. Four categories emerged from the prospective teachers’ views regarding writing topic selection: disciplines, emotions, currency, and individuals. The most cited main category among these is emotions. The emotions main category is further divided into subcategories: romance, love, longing, misery, loneliness, joy of life, breaking up, happiness, fear and motivation. The main category of discipline ranked second following emotions. This theme encompassed the categories of education, language, literature, philosophy and history. The prospective teachers mostly wrote about education and literature. The main category of currency was split into two categories, i.e. social problems and current events, while individuals main category into four: family, friendship, your own life and people. Five categories emerged from the prospective teachers’ views regarding writing skill: psychology, competence, creation, expression and benefit. The most cited categories were psychology and expression.

References

  1. Arıcı, A. F. (2009). Preferred writing topics of preservice teachers. European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2), 95-99.

  2. Aslan, C. (2019). Preferences writing topics of secondary school students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 17-34.

  3. Atwell, N. (1985). Everyone sits at a big desk: Discovering topics for writing. The English Journal, 74(5), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/817698

  4. Bonzo, J. D. (2008). To assign a topic or not: observing fluency and complexity in intermediate foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 41(4), 722-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03327.x

  5. Cohen, J. (2013). The impact of topic selection on writing fluency: Making a case for freedom. Journal of NELTA, 18(1-2), 31-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v18i1-2.10328

  6. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. In J. W. Creswell (Ed.), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (pp. 53-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  7. Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. A. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum – a case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47.

  8. Dickinson, P. (2014). The effect of topic-selection control on EFL writing fluency. Journal of Niigata University of International and Information Studies, 17, 15-25.

  9. Dyson, A. H. (1983). The role of oral language in early writing processes. Research in the Teaching of English, 17(1), 1-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40170911

  10. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

  11. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1106-1113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1106

  12. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1987). On the structure of the writing process. Top Lang Disord, 7(4), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-198709000-00004

  13. Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 256-266. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197724

  14. Kurudayıoğlu, M., & Karadağ, Ö. (2010). Examining the written expressions of primary school graders as regard to their choice of topics. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7(13), 192-207. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mkusbed/issue/19571/208612

  15. McKenna, B. J., & McKenna, J. J. (2000) Selecting topics for research writing projects. The English Journal, 89(6), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/821263

  16. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. USA: Sage Publication.

  17. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. USA: Sage Publication.

  18. Peterson, S. (2000). Sixth, and eighth graders' preferred writing topics and identification of gender markers in stories. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 79-100. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/499660

  19. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Puckett, D., & Ramsey, M. (2007). Preferred writing topics of urban and rural middle school students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(1), 59-66.

  20. Sponseller, A. C., & Wilkins, M. (2015). Investigating the impact of topic selection control on writing fluency. Hiroshima Studies in Language and Language Education, 18, 141-152.

  21. Stein, N. L. (1983). On the goals, functions, and knowledge of reading and writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90017-6

  22. Tompkins, G. E. (1982). Seven reasons why children should write stories. Language Arts, 59(7), 718-721. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41405103

  23. Ülper, H., & Çeliktürk Sezgin, Z. (2019). Determination of writing habits profiles of education faculty students. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 49, 149-170. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maeuefd/issue/42791/428605

  24. Warnock, J. (1983). The writing process. Rhetoric Review, 2(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198309359052

  25. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin.

bottom of page