top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 18 January 2022

Teachers’ Reading Comprehension and Use of Reading Strategies Levels: A Study on the Secondary School Teachers

Ahmet Kanmaz

Pamukkale University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 1-14

Keywords: Reading Comprehension, Reading Strategy, Secondary School Teachers


As highlighted by international assessments, the reading comprehension levels of Turkish students are far from the desired level. In this sense, the competencies of teachers who play a vital role in promoting students' reading comprehension skills are of high importance. The expectation that teachers who have a long educational life will have a high level of reading comprehension skills is the central starting point for this study. Identifying the level of reading comprehension of teachers is crucially important in terms of revealing competency levels of teachers. In this study, a descriptive screening model, one of the quantitative research methods, was employed to identify teachers’ levels of reading comprehension and use of reading strategies. The universe of the research consists of teachers working in secondary schools in Denizli province. Stratified sampling, which is based on probability sampling, was used for the selection of the sample. The sample included a total of 418 teachers. The research findings indicate that the teachers' reading comprehension and use of reading strategies levels differ by the branch variable, and Turkish teachers exhibit better reading comprehension than other teachers since it is their field of study. In addition to that, it is seen that there is a positive and significant relationship between the level of use of reading strategies and the level of reading comprehension. Therefore, it is thought that an effective instruction of reading strategies will enable teachers of other branches to yield better performance.


  1. Akyol, H. (2005). Türkçe ilkokuma yazma öğretimi (Turkish primary reading and writing teaching). Gündüz Eğitim.

  2. Aydoğan R. (2008), Reading Comprehension Strategies and Creativity Levels Used in Turkish Lesson by 6th Grade Students with Positive and Negative Attitudes towards Reading, (Unpublished master’s thesis)., Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir

  3. Baltacı, A. (2017). Reading styles and reading comprehension levels of school principals. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 1-32.

  4. Barnett, M. A. (1988), Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects l2 comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150-162.

  5. Başaran, M. (2013). Reading fluency as an indicator of reading comprehension, Kuram ve Uygulamalarda Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(4), 2277-2290.

  6. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (2008). Social construction of reality: A sociology of knowledge review. Paradigma

  7. Botsas, G. Padeliadu, S. (2003), “Goal Orientation and Reading Comprehension Strategy Usa among Students with and without Reading Difficulties”, International Journal of Educational Research. Vol:39, No:4-5, ss.477-495 ( DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010)

  8. Brandshaw, G. J. (1998), Text Reconstruction Or Sq3r? An Investigation Into The Effectiveness Of Two Teaching Methods For Developing Textbook Comprehension In College Students.” Doctor of education, Vanderbilt University, USA.

  9. Bügel, K., & Buunk, B. P. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 80(1), 15- 31.

  10. Can, R., Türkyılmaz, M., & Karadeniz, A. (2010). Reading habits of adolescent students. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 1-21.

  11. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.

  12. Ceran, E., Oğuzgiray Yıldız, M. & Özdemir, İ. (2015). Examination of primary school 2nd grade students' reading comprehension skills by gender and age. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 151-166.

  13. Chavez, M. (2001). Gender in the language classroom. McGraw Hill.

  14. Clark K. F. (2009). The Nature and influence of comprehension strategy use during peer-led literature discussions: An analysis of intermediate grade students' practice. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(2), 95-119.

  15. Coelho, C. L. G., & Correa, J. (2017). Reading comprehension: Cognitive abilities and types of text. Psico, 48(1), 40-49.

  16. Cohen, A. D. (1990), Language Learning: Insights for Learners, Teachers and Researchers. Newbury House Publishers.

  17. Çam, B. (2006). The relationship between primary school students' visual reading levels and their reading comprehension, critical reading and academic achievement in Turkish lessons. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.

  18. Çiftçi, Ö., & Temizyürek, F. (2008). Determination of Reading Comprehension Skills of Primary 5th Grade Students. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(9), 109-129.

  19. Çöğmen, S. (2008), Determination of reading comprehension strategies of education faculty students, (Unpublished master’s thesis), Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Aydın

  20. Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 44-47.

  21. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of reading, 9(2), 167-188.

  22. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 136-158.

  23. Fotovatian, S. and Shokrpour, N. (2007), Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Reading Comprehension Strategies On İranian University Students Comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 47-63.

  24. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Pearson.

  25. Güneş, F. (2004), Literacy teaching and brain technology. Ocak Yayınları.

  26. Habermas, J. (2001). Communicative action theory. (Çev: M. Tüzel). Kabalcı.

  27. Hardebeck, M. M. (2006), Effectiveness And Usage Of Reading Comprehension Strategies For Second Grade Title 1 Students. (Unpulished Master Thesis), Minnesota State University Education Department, Minnesota.

  28. Heidegger, M. (2002). Letters for humanism: the essence of humanism. (Çev: A. Aydoğan). İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.

  29. Karasar, N. (2005), Scientific Research Method, 15. Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

  30. Karatay, H. (2007). A study on primary school Turkish teacher candidates' reading comprehension skills. (Unpublished Phd. Thesis), Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  31. Kartal, E., & Özteke, H. Ç. (2010). Determination of reading comprehension and expression levels of primary school students, The Journal of International Social Research, 3 (11), 372- 380.

  32. Kıroğlu, K. (2012), The effect of meaningful learning strategies on reading comprehension in English, 19 Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 6-12.

  33. Kurnaz, H., & Akaydın, Ş. (2015). Turkish teacher candidates' ability to summarize informative and narrative texts. Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 141-156. download/article-file/715430

  34. Mayer-RE. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text- the soi model for guiding 3 cognitive processes in knowledge construction, Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357-371.

  35. Odabaş, H., Odabaş, Y., & Polat, C. (2008). Reading styles of university students: Ankara Üniversitesi örneği. Bilgi Dünyası, 9(2), 431-465.

  36. Özyılmaz G, Alcı B. (2011), The effect of teaching reading comprehension strategies to 7th grade primary school students on reading comprehension achievement. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4(1), 71-94

  37. Paporello, A. G. (1991), “Sq3r: a must for teaching science concepts to sixth graders?” Cleringhouse: Reading and Communication Skills, New Jersey.

  38. Rich, R. Z., Blake, S. (1994). Using pictures to assist in comprehension and recall, Intervention in School and Clinic, 29(5), 271.

  39. Salembier,G. B.(1999). SCAN and RUN: A Reading Comprehension Strategy That Works. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(5), 386. seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

  40. Sallabaş, E. (2008). The relationship between primary school 8th grade students' attitudes towards reading and their reading comprehension skills. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9,(16), 141-155.

  41. Saracaloğlu, A. S., & Karasakaloğlu, N. (2011). Determining the reading comprehension levels of primary school teacher candidates and their study and learning strategies in terms of various variables. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 98-115.

  42. Sim, S. (2007), A Study on Reading Strategies in KSL Class, Unpublished Doctor’s Thesis. University of New South Wales School of Modern Language Studies.

  43. Suna, Ç. (2006). Analytical determination and evaluation of the factors affecting primary school students' reading interests and styles, (Unpulished Master Thesis), Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.

  44. Stevens R. J. (1988). Effects of strategy training on the ıdentification of the main ıdea of expository passages, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 21-26.

  45. Swennumson, S. (1992). The effect of the Sq3r study method on reading comprehension of nontraditional collage students, Doctor of Education Drake University, USA

  46. Şencan, H. (2005), Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik, Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  47. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

  48. Tayşi, E. K. (2007), Comparison of reading comprehension skills of 5th and 8th grade primary school students in story and essay type texts (the example of Kütahya province). (Unpulished Master Thesis), Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  49. Tok, Ş. (2003), The effect of knowledge map and examination-asking questions-reading-answering without looking-reviewing strategies on academic success and permanence in the third grade life studies course in primary education., (Unpublished Phd. Thesis), Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.

  50. Topuzkanamış, E., & Maltepe, S. (2010). The levels of pre-service teachers' reading comprehension and using reading strategies.TÜBAR, 27, 655-677.

  51. Van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Schneider, W. E. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(3), 305–324.

  52. Ungan, S. (2008), Reading books in Turkey: the cultural basis of our reading habits. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 218–228.

  53. Vega, M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition & Emotion, 10(3), 303-322.

  54. Yılmaz, B., Köse, E., & Korkut, Ş. (2009). A research on reading habits of Hacettepe University and Bilkent University students. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 23(1), 22-51. view/446/436

bottom of page